Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA; E. P. Bradley Hospital, Riverside, RI, 02915, USA.
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108747. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108747. Epub 2021 May 21.
Theoretical models of behavior change argue that youth should decrease their time with cannabis-using friends and increase their time with non-using friends during treatment. Informed by behavior-change models of recovery and socialization and selection peer-influence models, the current study examined whether combining evidence-based psychosocial treatment with adjunctive pharmacotherapy helps youth decrease their affiliations with cannabis-using friends and increase their affiliations with non-using friends during cannabis misuse treatment.
Youth ages 15-24 years (51 % male), participated in a double-blind randomized clinical trial that tested the effects of motivational enhancement and cognitive behavioral therapy (MET-CBT) plus topiramate (N = 39) or placebo (N = 26) on cannabis craving and use. Ecological momentary assessment data, collected via smartphones throughout the six-week intervention, assessed youths' time with cannabis-using and non-using friends, cannabis use, and craving in daily life. Multiple group multilevel structural equation modeling tested study hypotheses.
Across the topiramate (48 % completion rate) and placebo (77 % completion rate) conditions, greater time spent with cannabis-using friends promoted greater next day cannabis use and craving (socialization effect). In turn, cannabis craving, but not use, promoted continued selection of cannabis-using friends. This indirect effect was only supported in the placebo condition due to the selection piece of this cycle not being significant for youth who received topiramate. Neither cannabis craving nor use were associated with time with non-using friends the next day.
MET-CBT and adjunctive topiramate pharmacotherapy interrupted youth selection processes. This finding suggests that changing peer affiliations could be one mechanism by which treatments can work.
行为改变理论模型认为,青少年在治疗期间应减少与使用大麻的朋友相处的时间,增加与不使用大麻的朋友相处的时间。受康复和社会化行为改变模型以及同伴影响选择模型的启发,本研究检验了在大麻滥用治疗期间,将循证心理社会治疗与辅助药物治疗相结合是否有助于青少年减少与使用大麻的朋友的联系,增加与不使用大麻的朋友的联系。
年龄在 15-24 岁之间的青少年(51%为男性)参加了一项双盲随机临床试验,该试验测试了动机增强和认知行为疗法(MET-CBT)加托吡酯(N=39)或安慰剂(N=26)对大麻渴望和使用的影响。通过智能手机在整个 6 周干预过程中收集的生态瞬时评估数据,评估了青少年与使用大麻的朋友和不使用大麻的朋友在一起的时间、大麻使用情况和日常生活中的渴望。多组多层结构方程模型检验了研究假设。
在托吡酯(完成率为 48%)和安慰剂(完成率为 77%)条件下,与使用大麻的朋友相处的时间越多,第二天使用大麻和渴望的可能性就越大(社会化效应)。反过来,大麻渴望而不是使用,促进了对使用大麻的朋友的持续选择。由于接受托吡酯治疗的青少年在选择环节上没有显著意义,这一间接影响仅在安慰剂条件下得到支持。大麻渴望和使用都与第二天与不使用大麻的朋友相处的时间无关。
MET-CBT 和辅助托吡酯药物治疗中断了青少年的选择过程。这一发现表明,改变同伴关系可能是治疗起作用的一种机制。