• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证不公正体验问卷(IEQ)在脊髓损伤人群中的适用性。

Validation of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in a spinal cord injury population.

机构信息

Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO, USA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2021 Nov;59(11):1177-1186. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00645-1. Epub 2021 May 29.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-021-00645-1
PMID:34052836
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data.

OBJECTIVES

To verify the factor structure of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) using a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess IEQ scale reliability and construct validity using the same population.

SETTING

Two SCI rehabilitation sites in the United States.

METHODS

Three datasets were combined to conduct this validation study. The sample consisted of 341 adults with SCI who completed the IEQ, measures of psychological distress and pain, and provided sociodemographic and injury-related information. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted to verify the two-factor structure of the IEQ, Cronbach's alpha was used to demonstrate scale reliability, and correlations between the IEQ and measures of pain and psychological distress were examined to assess construct validity.

RESULTS

Poor model fit was observed for the two-factor structure of the IEQ as well as for the subsequent factor-structures that were explored. The IEQ demonstrated strong scale reliability (α = 0.89) and correlations between the IEQ and measures of pain and psychological distress were in the expected direction, indicating good construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary validation study, we failed to confirm the two-factor structure of the IEQ in a population of individuals with SCI. Though good scale reliability and construct validity were observed, further study is needed to refine the IEQ for use in this population.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性横断面数据分析。

目的

使用脊髓损伤(SCI)患者样本验证不公正体验问卷(IEQ)的因子结构,并使用相同人群评估 IEQ 量表的信度和结构效度。

设置

美国两个 SCI 康复中心。

方法

本验证研究合并了三个数据集。样本包括 341 名完成 IEQ、心理困扰和疼痛测量以及提供社会人口学和损伤相关信息的成年人。进行了一系列验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性因子分析(EFA),以验证 IEQ 的两因素结构,使用 Cronbach's alpha 来证明量表的可靠性,IEQ 与疼痛和心理困扰测量之间的相关性来评估结构效度。

结果

IEQ 的两因素结构以及随后探索的因素结构的模型拟合较差。IEQ 具有很强的量表可靠性(α=0.89),IEQ 与疼痛和心理困扰测量之间的相关性呈预期方向,表明具有良好的结构效度。

结论

在这项初步验证研究中,我们未能在 SCI 患者人群中确认 IEQ 的两因素结构。虽然观察到了良好的量表可靠性和结构效度,但需要进一步研究来改进该问卷在该人群中的使用。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in a spinal cord injury population.验证不公正体验问卷(IEQ)在脊髓损伤人群中的适用性。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Nov;59(11):1177-1186. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00645-1. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
[Validation of the German-language version of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in five outpatient clinics].[德语版不公正经历问卷(IEQ)在五家门诊诊所的验证]
Schmerz. 2019 Apr;33(2):106-115. doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0345-z.
3
Injustice Experience Questionnaire, Japanese Version: Cross-Cultural Factor-Structure Comparison and Demographics Associated with Perceived Injustice.不公正经历问卷,日文版:跨文化因素结构比较及与感知不公正相关的人口统计学特征
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160567. eCollection 2016.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Injustice Experience Questionnaire in Greek.跨文化调适与希腊版不公正经验问卷的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(18):4307-4314. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2269848. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
Psychometric assessment of the Swedish version of the injustice experience questionnaire among patients with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者中瑞典版不公正经历问卷的心理测量评估
Scand J Pain. 2021 Jul 29;21(4):732-742. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0187. Print 2021 Oct 26.
6
Preliminary Validation of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire in Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者不公正体验问卷的初步验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Apr;65(4):e345-e351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.142. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire.挪威版不公正体验问卷的翻译与验证。
Scand J Pain. 2021 Dec 7;22(1):77-87. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0177. Print 2022 Jan 27.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hebrew version of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire - long and short versions.跨文化适应和希伯来语版不公正体验问卷——长、短版的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Feb;45(4):696-702. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2036255. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Validation of the Injustice Experiences Questionnaire in a heterogeneous trauma sample.在异质性创伤样本中对不公正经历问卷的验证
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Aug;61(3):336-344. doi: 10.1037/rep0000097. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
10
Parental Injustice Appraisals in the Context of Child Pain: Examining the Construct and Criterion Validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.父母在儿童疼痛情境中的不公正评价:IEQ-Pc 和 IEQ-Ps 的结构和效标效度检验。
J Pain. 2020 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):195-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Use of PROMs in Paediatric Orthopaedic Registries.评估患者报告结局量表在儿科骨科登记处的应用。
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;10(9):1552. doi: 10.3390/children10091552.
2
Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 2. Understanding the lived experience in people with spinal cord injury.澳大利亚国际脊髓损伤(Aus-InSCI)社区调查:2. 了解脊髓损伤患者的生活体验。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Dec;60(12):1069-1079. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00817-7. Epub 2022 Jun 15.