College of Dentistry, Texas A&M University, Dallas, U.S.A.
Affiliate Faculty Graduate Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, U.S.A.
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jan 11;66(1):68-74. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00198. Epub 2021 May 28.
To measure the accuracy of the additively manufactured casts with 3 base designs: solid, honeycomb-structure, and hollowed bases.
A virtual cast was used to create different base designs: solid (S Group), honeycomb-structure (HC group), and hollowed (H group). Three standard tessellation language files were used to fabricate the specimens using a material jetting printer (J720 Dental; Stratasys) and a resin (VeroDent MED670; Stratasys) (n=15). A coordinate measuring machine was selected to measure the linear and 3D discrepancies between the virtual cast and each specimen. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that all the data was not normally distributed (P<.05). Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used (α=.05).
The S group obtained a median ±interquartile range 3D discrepancy of 53.00 ±73.25 µm, the HC group of 58.00 ±67.25 µm, and the H group of 34.00 ±45.00 µm. Significant differences were found in the x- (P<.001), y- (P<.001), and z-axes (P<.001), and 3D discrepancies among the groups (P<.001). Significant differences were found between the S and H groups (P=.002) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the x-axis; S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the y-axis; S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the z-axis; and S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the 3D discrepancy.
The base designs influenced on the accuracy of the casts but all the specimens obtained a clinically acceptable manufacturing range. The H group obtained the highest accuracy.
测量 3 种基底设计(实心、蜂窝结构和空心基底)的增材制造模型的精度。
使用虚拟模型来创建不同的基底设计:实心(S 组)、蜂窝结构(HC 组)和空心(H 组)。使用材料喷射打印机(J720 Dental;Stratasys)和树脂(VeroDent MED670;Stratasys)(n=15)使用三个标准的三角网格语言文件制造标本。选择坐标测量机来测量虚拟模型与每个标本之间的线性和三维差异。Shapiro-Wilk 检验表明,所有数据均呈非正态分布(P<.05)。使用 Kruskal Wallis 和 Mann Whitney U 检验(α=.05)。
S 组获得的中位数±四分位间距三维差异为 53.00±73.25 µm,HC 组为 58.00±67.25 µm,H 组为 34.00±45.00 µm。在 x-(P<.001)、y-(P<.001)和 z-轴(P<.001)以及各组之间的三维差异(P<.001)方面,发现了显著差异。在 x 轴上,S 组和 H 组(P=.002)以及 HC 组和 H 组(P<.001)之间,y 轴上 S 组和 H 组(P<.001)以及 HC 组和 H 组(P<.001)之间,z 轴上 S 组和 H 组(P<.001)以及 HC 组和 H 组(P<.001)之间,以及三维差异方面 S 组和 H 组(P<.001)以及 HC 组和 H 组(P<.001)之间,均发现了显著差异。
基底设计影响模型的精度,但所有标本都获得了临床可接受的制造范围。H 组获得了最高的精度。