• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少原住民和移民之间在性健康和生殖健康方面的不平等:可持续跨文化医疗保健途径的德尔菲共识。

Reducing Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Between Natives and Migrants: A Delphi Consensus for Sustainable Cross-Cultural Healthcare Pathways.

机构信息

Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 May 13;9:656454. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656454. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.656454
PMID:34055720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8155376/
Abstract

The increasing number of international migrants (ranging from 153 million in 1990 to ~272 million in 2019) brought to attention the wide variation of national contexts concerning the policy measures to protect migrants' rights and ensuring their equal access to basic and essential services, namely in health. Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) is a key component to the overall health and quality of life and is impacted by power inequities inherent to society's institutions, environment, economics, and culture. In Portugal, guidelines for intervention in SRH are insufficient, a gap that is more pronounced with migrant populations due to the absence of culturally sensitive indicators to assess and monitor SRH. The aim of this work was 2-fold: to identify good practices in the SRH field, with a particular focus, whenever possible, on migrant populations, and to identify relevant and inclusive indicators to monitor SRH in Portugal. A Delphi panel (via online survey) with 66 experts (researchers, teachers, and health professionals) and 16 stakeholders (non-governmental organizations, civil society, and governmental organizations) was implemented in two rounds. Panelists were asked to state their level of agreement (5-point Likert-type scale) regarding four different SRH areas: Sexual Health, Reproductive Health, Social-Structural Factors, and Good Practices. Items were based on literature review and a World Café with 15 experts and stakeholders. Participation rate was 68% and response rate was 97% on the first round. From the initial list of 142 items, a total of 118 (83%) items were approved by consensus. Findings may provide extended opportunities for the healthcare system to engage in better informed decisions and more inclusive and integrative strategies regarding SRH, contributing to build political measures toward sexual and reproductive justice.

摘要

国际移民人数不断增加(从 1990 年的 1.53 亿增加到 2019 年的约 2.72 亿),引起了人们对保护移民权利和确保他们平等获得基本和必要服务(包括卫生保健)的国家政策措施的广泛差异的关注。性健康和生殖健康(SRH)是整体健康和生活质量的关键组成部分,受到社会机构、环境、经济和文化中固有权力不平等的影响。在葡萄牙,SRH 干预指南不足,由于缺乏评估和监测 SRH 的文化敏感指标,这种差距在移民群体中更为明显。这项工作的目的有两个:一是确定 SRH 领域的良好做法,特别是在可能的情况下关注移民群体;二是确定监测葡萄牙 SRH 的相关和包容的指标。采用两轮在线调查的 Delphi 小组(共有 66 名专家(研究人员、教师和卫生专业人员)和 16 名利益相关者(非政府组织、民间社会和政府组织)参与了这项研究。小组成员被要求就四个不同的 SRH 领域(性健康、生殖健康、社会结构因素和良好做法)表示他们的同意程度(5 点 Likert 量表)。项目依据文献综述和与 15 名专家和利益相关者的世界咖啡会制定。参与率为 68%,第一轮的回复率为 97%。在最初的 142 项清单中,共有 118 项(83%)经协商一致通过。研究结果可能为医疗保健系统提供更多机会,使其能够就 SRH 问题做出更明智的决策和更具包容性和整体性的策略,为建立性和生殖健康方面的政治措施做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/ac579b4e7f92/fpubh-09-656454-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/e1d9ebd75b95/fpubh-09-656454-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/79e053359d2c/fpubh-09-656454-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/4d03280a3732/fpubh-09-656454-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/be78d7a92c28/fpubh-09-656454-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/42f6e5805721/fpubh-09-656454-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/72d6495d5d2e/fpubh-09-656454-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/ac579b4e7f92/fpubh-09-656454-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/e1d9ebd75b95/fpubh-09-656454-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/79e053359d2c/fpubh-09-656454-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/4d03280a3732/fpubh-09-656454-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/be78d7a92c28/fpubh-09-656454-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/42f6e5805721/fpubh-09-656454-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/72d6495d5d2e/fpubh-09-656454-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d3/8155376/ac579b4e7f92/fpubh-09-656454-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Between Natives and Migrants: A Delphi Consensus for Sustainable Cross-Cultural Healthcare Pathways.减少原住民和移民之间在性健康和生殖健康方面的不平等:可持续跨文化医疗保健途径的德尔菲共识。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 13;9:656454. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656454. eCollection 2021.
2
Fertility, Migration and Acculturation (FEMINA): a research protocol for studying intersectional sexual and reproductive health inequalities.生育力、迁移与文化适应(FEMINA):研究交叉性性与生殖健康不平等问题的研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0795-5.
3
A review of the literature on sexual and reproductive health of African migrant and refugee children.非洲移民和难民儿童性与生殖健康文献综述
Reprod Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01138-3.
4
"One-time interventions, it doesn't lead to much" - healthcare provider views to improving sexual and reproductive health services for young migrants in Sweden.一次性干预措施作用不大”——瑞典改善年轻移民性与生殖健康服务的医疗保健提供者观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 18;22(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07945-z.
5
Beyond supply and demand: a new ecological framework for understanding the access of young migrants to sexual and reproductive health services in Sweden.超越供求关系:理解瑞典年轻移民获得性与生殖健康服务的新生态框架。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2251783. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2251783.
6
Providing sexual and reproductive health services to migrants in Southern Sweden: a qualitative exploration of healthcare providers' experiences.为瑞典南部的移民提供性与生殖健康服务:医疗保健提供者经验的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):1562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08967-3.
7
"In My Culture, We Don't Know Anything About That": Sexual and Reproductive Health of Migrant and Refugee Women.“在我们的文化中,我们对此一无所知”:移民和难民妇女的性与生殖健康
Int J Behav Med. 2017 Dec;24(6):836-845. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9662-3.
8
The Role of Culture and Religion on Sexual and Reproductive Health Indicators and Help-Seeking Attitudes amongst 1.5 Generation Migrants in Australia: A Quantitative Pilot Study.文化和宗教对澳大利亚 1.5 代移民的性健康和生殖健康指标及求助态度的影响:一项定量试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031341.
9
Sexual and reproductive health of migrants: does the EU care?移民的性健康和生殖健康:欧盟在意吗?
Health Policy. 2014 Feb;114(2-3):215-25. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
International migrants' right to sexual and reproductive health care.国际移民获得性健康和生殖健康护理的权利。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;157(1):210-215. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14149. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Proportional representation and incidence rate of repeat visits in ethnic minorities compared to native Dutch people under the age of 25 years in the Netherlands.荷兰25岁以下少数族裔与荷兰本土居民相比的复诊比例及发病率。
J Migr Health. 2025 Jul 26;12:100344. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100344. eCollection 2025.
2
Immigrant women's perspectives on contraceptive counselling provided by midwives in Sweden - a qualitative study.移民妇女对瑞典助产士提供的避孕咨询的看法——一项定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2111796. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2111796.
3
Predictors of migration in an HIV hyper-endemic rural South African community: evidence from a population-based cohort (2005-2017).

本文引用的文献

1
Health monitoring and health indicators in Europe.欧洲的健康监测与健康指标
J Health Monit. 2017 Mar 15;2(1):3-21. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-020.2. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
Gender-based Structural Stigma and Intimate Partner Violence Across 28 Countries: A Population-based Study of Women Across Sexual Orientation, Immigration Status, and Socioeconomic Status.基于性别的结构性耻辱与 28 个国家的亲密伴侣暴力:对不同性取向、移民身份和社会经济地位的女性进行的基于人群的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8941-NP8964. doi: 10.1177/0886260520976212. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
A Transdiagnostic Approach to Sexual Distress and Sexual Pleasure: A Preliminary Mediation Study with Repetitive Negative Thinking.
在一个艾滋病毒高度流行的南非农村社区中迁移的预测因素:基于人群的队列研究(2005-2017 年)的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):1141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13526-w.
一种跨诊断的性困扰和性愉悦方法:重复消极思维的初步中介研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(21):7864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217864.
4
Magnitude and trends in socio-economic and geographic inequality in access to birth by cesarean section in Tanzania: evidence from five rounds of Tanzania demographic and health surveys (1996-2015).坦桑尼亚剖宫产分娩的社会经济和地理不平等的程度及趋势:来自五轮坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查(1996 - 2015年)的证据
Arch Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;78:80. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00466-3. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women in Europe: a scoping review.与欧洲移民妇女宫颈癌筛查参与相关的因素:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01275-4.
6
Inequalities in adherence to cervical cancer screening in Portugal.葡萄牙宫颈癌筛查依从性的不平等。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2021 Mar 1;30(2):171-177. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000612.
7
Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019.按收入、地区和堕胎合法状况划分的意外妊娠和堕胎:1990-2019 年综合模型估计。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1152-e1161. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
The woman's choice for abortion: the experience in Portugal with implementation of the National Network.女性的堕胎选择:葡萄牙实施国家网络的经验。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Apr 6;36Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e00036219. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00036219. eCollection 2020.
9
The relationship between chronic diseases and number of sexual partners: an exploratory analysis.慢性病与性伴侣数量之间的关系:一项探索性分析。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr;46(2):100-107. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200352. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
10
Sexual and reproductive health and rights of refugee and migrant women: gynecologists' and obstetricians' responsibilities.难民和移民妇女的性与生殖健康和权利:妇科医生和产科医生的责任。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;149(1):113-119. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13111. Epub 2020 Feb 18.