• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项用于评估新冠病毒社区评估中心有效性和可接受性的混合方法方案。

A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs.

作者信息

Mulcahy Symmons Sophie, Fox Robert, Mannion Marese, Joyce David, De Brún Aoife, Glynn Liam, Ryan Damien, Keane Niamh, McAuliffe Eilish

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2021 May 12;4:16. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2
PMID:34056538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8136252/
Abstract

Ireland's health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched system. COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs (CAHs) were established to mitigate unnecessary admission to acute hospitals, and reduce infection spread by supporting COVID-19 positive or suspected positive patients to isolate at home, or in isolation facilities. There is some evidence that similar assessment centres may be a successful triage strategy to reduce burden on hospital and acute care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs on service delivery in two regions in Ireland during the pandemic. A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating co-design to engage stakeholders and ensure informed data capture and analysis. Online surveys will assess CAH patients' experiences of access to and quality of care. Clinical patient data from CAHs will be collected and analysed using multinomial logistic regression to check for association with patient demographics and COVID-19 symptoms, and CAH early warning scores and outcomes (Transfer to Emergency Department, Transfer to isolation unit, Sent home with care plan). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with: patients to elicit an in-depth understanding of experiences and acceptability of attending CAHs; and staff to understand challenges, benefits, and effectiveness of CAHs. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis. : This study will provide valuable insights from both patient and staff perspectives on the operation of CAHs. We will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of CAHs and propose areas for improvement of the service. This will contribute to international literature on the use of community assessment centres during infectious disease pandemics.

摘要

由于人员短缺和能力不足,爱尔兰的医疗系统一直承受着巨大压力。爱尔兰的人均重症监护床位容量在欧洲处于最低水平之一,因此,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给这个不堪重负的系统带来了额外压力。设立了COVID-19社区评估中心(CAHs),以减少不必要的急性医院入院,并通过支持COVID-19阳性或疑似阳性患者在家中或隔离设施中隔离来减少感染传播。有证据表明,类似的评估中心可能是减轻医院和急性护理负担的成功分诊策略。本研究的目的是评估COVID-19社区评估中心在大流行期间对爱尔兰两个地区服务提供的影响。将采用混合方法,包括共同设计,以使利益相关者参与并确保数据的有效收集和分析。在线调查将评估CAH患者获得护理的体验和护理质量。将收集CAHs的临床患者数据,并使用多项逻辑回归进行分析,以检查与患者人口统计学和COVID-19症状以及CAH早期预警评分和结果(转至急诊科、转至隔离病房、带着护理计划回家)之间的关联。将对以下人员进行半结构化访谈:患者,以深入了解他们前往CAHs的体验和可接受性;工作人员,以了解CAHs的挑战、益处和有效性。访谈数据将采用主题分析进行分析。本研究将从患者和工作人员的角度为CAHs的运作提供有价值的见解。我们将评估CAHs的有效性和可接受性,并提出服务改进的领域。这将为关于在传染病大流行期间使用社区评估中心的国际文献做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a870/8136255/f7d764d6e49b/hrbopenres-4-14482-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a870/8136255/f7d764d6e49b/hrbopenres-4-14482-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a870/8136255/f7d764d6e49b/hrbopenres-4-14482-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs.一项用于评估新冠病毒社区评估中心有效性和可接受性的混合方法方案。
HRB Open Res. 2021 May 12;4:16. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2. eCollection 2021.
2
COVID-19 community assessment hubs in Ireland: A study of staff and patient perceptions of their value.爱尔兰的 COVID-19 社区评估中心:对其价值的员工和患者感知研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):119-131. doi: 10.1111/hex.13603. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
What Is the Quality of Surgical Care for Patients with Hip Fractures at Critical Access Hospitals?接受髋关节骨折手术的患者在关键通道医院的手术护理质量如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):9-16. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001458.
4
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
5
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Telehealth Impact in Frontier Critical Access Hospitals: Mixed Methods Evaluation.远程医疗对偏远地区急救医院的影响:混合方法评估
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 20;7:e49591. doi: 10.2196/49591.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
9
Patients' experiences of, and engagement with, remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: A rapid mixed-methods study.新冠患者远程家庭监测服务的患者体验及参与情况:一项快速混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2386-2404. doi: 10.1111/hex.13548. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
10
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China.以患者为中心的护理和患者满意度:在中国验证医患互动问卷。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:990620. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620. eCollection 2022.
2
COVID-19 community assessment hubs in Ireland: A study of staff and patient perceptions of their value.爱尔兰的 COVID-19 社区评估中心:对其价值的员工和患者感知研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):119-131. doi: 10.1111/hex.13603. Epub 2022 Nov 5.