• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的护理和患者满意度:在中国验证医患互动问卷。

Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Kunshan Huaqiao People's Hospital, Kunshan, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:990620. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620
PMID:36420009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9676965/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To introduce patient-centered approach in China and to relate it with Chinese patient satisfaction validating the Chinese version of Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ-C).

DESIGN

This cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews from June to September in 2019. Participants rated their patient-centered care experience the 16-item translated PPIQ, their experience of the received medical service, and their overall satisfaction.

SETTING

Kunshan Huaqiao People's Hospital in Jiangsu, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 230 participants (87 males and 143 females; 108 outpatients and 122 inpatients).

RESULTS

PPIQ-C exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Data revealed a single factor model of the 16 PPIQ-C items [ = 12.394, = 0.823, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.019, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.032] had a superior model fit over the original first-order with four correlated factors and the second-order structures. The overall reliability was excellent (McDonald's ω = 0.975). In terms of patient satisfaction, process, treatment quality, and communication significantly predicted patient satisfaction, while environment, staff attitude, and medical ethics did not [ = 0.427, = 24.887, < 0.001]. Most importantly, the total score of PPIQ-C predicted patient satisfaction above and beyond the above-mentioned medical service perspectives ( = 0.595, = 0.207, = 0.004). Finally, the constructive effect of PCC on patient satisfaction was stronger for departments of Pediatrics than Surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the PPIQ scale (PPIQ-C) exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Yet the distinction among the four factors was not supported, suggesting potential difference(s) across cultures. Patient-centered care (PCC), reflected by the overall PPIQ-C score, predicted overall patient satisfaction above and beyond other medical service perspectives. Adopting PCC approach in appropriate situations will probably advance the development of performance evaluation systems in China, thus improving the overall health care and patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

介绍中国以患者为中心的方法,并将其与中国患者满意度相关联,同时验证患者-专业人员互动问卷(PPIQ-C)的中文版。

设计

这是一项横断面调查,于 2019 年 6 月至 9 月通过面对面访谈进行。参与者对他们的以患者为中心的护理体验(经过翻译的 16 项 PPIQ)、他们对所接受医疗服务的体验以及他们的整体满意度进行了评分。

地点

中国江苏昆山华侨医院。

参与者

共有 230 名参与者(男性 87 名,女性 143 名;门诊患者 108 名,住院患者 122 名)。

结果

PPIQ-C 表现出可接受的心理测量特性。数据显示,16 项 PPIQ-C 项目的单因素模型[ = 12.394, = 0.823,CFI = 1.000,TLI = 1.019,RMSEA = 0.000,SRMR = 0.032]优于原始一阶四因素相关和二阶结构,模型拟合度更高。整体信度极佳(McDonald's ω = 0.975)。就患者满意度而言,过程、治疗质量和沟通显著预测了患者满意度,而环境、员工态度和医疗道德则没有( = 0.427, = 24.887, < 0.001)。最重要的是,PPIQ-C 的总分预测患者满意度高于上述医疗服务视角( = 0.595, = 0.207, = 0.004)。最后,以患者为中心的护理(PCC)对儿科部门患者满意度的构建效果强于外科部门。

结论

患者-专业人员互动问卷(PPIQ)的中文版(PPIQ-C)具有可接受的心理测量特性。然而,四个因素之间的区别并不支持,这表明文化之间存在潜在差异。以患者为中心的护理(PCC),由整个 PPIQ-C 评分反映,在预测整体患者满意度方面优于其他医疗服务视角。在适当的情况下采用以患者为中心的方法可能会促进中国绩效评估体系的发展,从而提高整体医疗保健和患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/943d/9676965/b4225a2b6893/fpubh-10-990620-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/943d/9676965/b4225a2b6893/fpubh-10-990620-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/943d/9676965/b4225a2b6893/fpubh-10-990620-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China.以患者为中心的护理和患者满意度:在中国验证医患互动问卷。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:990620. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620. eCollection 2022.
2
The Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) to assess patient centered care from the patient's perspective.患者-专业人员互动问卷 (PPIQ) 用于从患者角度评估以患者为中心的护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Perceptions of Parental Illness Questionnaire for Cancer.癌症父母疾病认知问卷的编制与初步心理测量学评估
Psychooncology. 2023 Jul;32(7):1130-1141. doi: 10.1002/pon.6168. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
5
Development and testing of a survey measure of organizational perinatal patient-centered care culture.组织围产患者中心护理文化调查测量工具的开发和测试。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):806-819. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13949. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
7
Patients' perspectives on information received in outpatient psychiatry.患者对门诊精神病学中所获信息的看法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Feb;13(1):110-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00928.x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).以患者为中心的气候问卷中文版——员工版(PCQ-S)的心理测量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Person-centered care in Chinese residential care facilities: a preliminary measure.中文养老院的以人为主的照护:初步措施。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(8):952-8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.790925. Epub 2013 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale.医患互动质量量表中文版的翻译与验证
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jun 21;9:100369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100369. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
The people-centered care and inpatients' perceived experience in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.中国以患者为中心的护理与住院患者的感知体验:一项全国性横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Feb 18;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02409-2.
3
An evaluation of outpatient satisfaction based on the national standard questionnaire: a satisfaction survey conducted in a tertiary hospital in Shenyang, China.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Patient-Centered Communication and Primary Care Quality in Urban China: Evidence From a Standardized Patient Study.患者为中心的沟通与城市中国基层医疗质量之间的关联:来自标准化患者研究的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;9:779293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.779293. eCollection 2021.
2
The Most Important Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Dimension: Patient-Centered Care.最重要的远程医疗患者满意度维度:以患者为中心的护理。
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Aug;28(8):1206-1214. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0322. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
What role do patients prefer in medical decision-making?: a population-based nationwide cross-sectional study.
基于国家标准问卷的门诊患者满意度评价:中国沈阳一家三级医院的满意度调查。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1348426. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348426. eCollection 2024.
患者在医疗决策中更喜欢扮演什么角色?一项基于人群的全国性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e048488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048488.
4
The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review.医院认证对医疗质量的影响:系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07097-6.
5
Patient satisfaction in China: a national survey of inpatients and outpatients.中国患者满意度:一项对住院患者和门诊患者的全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e049570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049570.
6
Predictors of patient-reported quality of care in low- and middle-income countries: a four-country survey of person-centered care.中低收入国家患者报告的医疗质量的预测因素:以人为中心的护理四国调查。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Aug 20;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab110.
7
Challenges of Research on Person-Centered Care in General Practice: A Scoping Review.全科医疗中以患者为中心的照护研究面临的挑战:一项范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:669491. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.669491. eCollection 2021.
8
A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs.一项用于评估新冠病毒社区评估中心有效性和可接受性的混合方法方案。
HRB Open Res. 2021 May 12;4:16. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2. eCollection 2021.
9
The situation and influencing factors of outpatient satisfaction in large hospitals: Evidence from Henan province, China.大型医院门诊患者满意度情况及影响因素:来自中国河南省的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 25;21(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06520-2.
10
Correlation between nurse-patient interaction and readiness to care for post-treated heart failure patients in the intensive care room Malang, Indonesia.印度尼西亚玛琅重症监护室中护患互动与后治疗心力衰竭患者护理准备度之间的相关性。
J Public Health Res. 2021 Apr 14;10(2):2229. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2229.