Suppr超能文献

不同分子亚型的 clear cell renal cell carcinoma 的危险因素存在差异。

Differences in risk factors for molecular subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;149(7):1448-1454. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33701. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

Abstract

The ccA and ccB molecular subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have well-characterized prognostic relevance. However, it is not known whether they possess distinct etiologies. We investigated the relationships between these subtypes and RCC risk factors within a case-control study conducted in Eastern Europe. We analyzed risk factor data for ccA (n = 144) and ccB (n = 106) cases and 1476 controls through case-only and case-control comparisons to assess risk factor differences across subtypes using logistic and polytomous regression models. We also performed a meta-analysis summarizing case-only results from our study and three patient cohorts. Patients with ccB tumors had poorer survival than those with ccA tumors and were more likely to be male (case-only odds ratio [OR] 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-5.03). In case-control analyses, body mass index was significantly associated with ccA tumors (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.18-5.10 for ≥35 vs <25 kg/m ) but not with ccB tumors (1.52, 0.56-4.12), while trichloroethylene was associated with ccB but not ccA (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.11-8.65 and 1.25, 0.36-4.39 respectively for ≥1.58 ppm-years vs unexposed). A polygenic risk score of genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies was associated with both ccA and, in particular, ccB (OR 1.82, 1.11-2.99 and 2.87, 95% CI 1.64-5.01 respectively for 90th vs 10th percentile). In a meta-analysis of case-only results including three patient cohorts, we still observed the ccB excess for male sex and the ccA excess for obesity. In conclusion, our findings suggest the existence of etiologic heterogeneity across ccRCC molecular subtypes for several risk factors.

摘要

ccA 和 ccB 两种透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)分子亚型具有明确的预后相关性。然而,它们是否具有不同的病因尚不清楚。我们在东欧进行的一项病例对照研究中,调查了这些亚型与 RCC 危险因素之间的关系。我们通过病例仅对照和病例对照比较分析了 ccA(n=144)和 ccB(n=106)病例以及 1476 名对照的危险因素数据,使用逻辑回归和多项式回归模型评估了亚组之间的危险因素差异。我们还进行了一项荟萃分析,总结了我们的研究和三个患者队列的病例仅结果。与 ccA 肿瘤患者相比,ccB 肿瘤患者的生存较差,且更可能为男性(病例仅比值比[OR]2.68,95%置信区间[CI]1.43-5.03)。在病例对照分析中,体重指数与 ccA 肿瘤显著相关(OR2.45,95%CI1.18-5.10,≥35 与<25 kg/m ),但与 ccB 肿瘤无关(1.52,0.56-4.12),而三氯乙烯与 ccB 但与 ccA 无关(OR3.09,95%CI1.11-8.65 和 1.25,0.36-4.39,分别为≥1.58 ppm 年与未暴露)。从全基因组关联研究中确定的遗传变异的多基因风险评分与 ccA 和特别是 ccB 相关(OR1.82,95%CI1.11-2.99 和 2.87,95%CI1.64-5.01,分别为 90 百分位与 10 百分位)。在包括三个患者队列的病例仅结果的荟萃分析中,我们仍然观察到男性中 ccB 过多,肥胖中 ccA 过多。总之,我们的研究结果表明,ccRCC 分子亚型的几种危险因素存在病因异质性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Molecular differences in renal cell carcinoma between males and females.男性和女性肾细胞癌之间的分子差异。
World J Urol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1727-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04347-6. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
A comparison of analytic approaches for investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer.比较分析方法研究肾癌患者肥胖悖论
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Apr;34(4):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01670-6. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验