• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线客观结构化临床考试中评估方法和测量工具的有效性和可靠性:系统范围界定综述。

Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review.

机构信息

School of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.

Office of Medical Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:11. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.11. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.11
PMID:34058802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8212027/
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required educators to adapt the in-person objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to online settings in order for it to remain a critical component of the multifaceted assessment of a student’s competency. This systematic scoping review aimed to summarize the assessment methods and validity and reliability of the measurement tools used in current online OSCE (hereafter, referred to as teleOSCE) approaches. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles were eligible if they reported any form of performance assessment, in any field of healthcare, delivered in an online format. Two reviewers independently screened the results and analyzed relevant studies. Eleven articles were included in the analysis. Pre-recorded videos were used in 3 studies, while observations by remote examiners through an online platform were used in 7 studies. Acceptability as perceived by students was reported in 2 studies. This systematic scoping review identified several insights garnered from implementing teleOSCEs, the components transferable from telemedicine, and the need for systemic research to establish the ideal teleOSCE framework. TeleOSCEs may be able to improve the accessibility and reproducibility of clinical assessments and equip students with the requisite skills to effectively practice telemedicine in the future.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行要求教育工作者将面对面的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)适应在线环境,以便其仍然是学生能力的多方面评估的关键组成部分。本系统范围综述旨在总结当前在线 OSCE(以下简称远程 OSCE)方法中使用的评估方法以及测量工具的有效性和可靠性。根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目进行了全面的文献综述,以进行范围审查指南。如果文章报告了任何形式的绩效评估,涉及任何医疗保健领域,并以在线形式提供,则符合条件。两名评审员独立筛选结果并分析相关研究。有 11 篇文章被纳入分析。3 项研究使用了预先录制的视频,而 7 项研究则通过在线平台使用远程考官的观察。有 2 项研究报告了学生的可接受性。本系统范围综述确定了从实施远程 OSCE 中获得的一些见解、可从远程医疗中转移的组件,以及需要系统研究来建立理想的远程 OSCE 框架。远程 OSCE 可能能够提高临床评估的可及性和可重复性,并使学生具备未来有效实践远程医疗的必要技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e20/8212027/5731433937db/jeehp-18-11f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e20/8212027/5731433937db/jeehp-18-11f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e20/8212027/5731433937db/jeehp-18-11f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review.在线客观结构化临床考试中评估方法和测量工具的有效性和可靠性:系统范围界定综述。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:11. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.11. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Empirical analysis comparing the tele-objective structured clinical examination (teleOSCE) and the in-person assessment in Australia.澳大利亚远程客观结构化临床考试(teleOSCE)与现场评估的实证分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:23. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.23. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Feasibility and reliability of the pandemic-adapted online-onsite hybrid graduation OSCE in Japan.日本大流行适应型线上-线下混合毕业客观结构化临床考试的可行性和可靠性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):949-965. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10290-3. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Structures, processes and outcomes of objective structured clinical examinations in dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的牙科教育中,客观结构化临床考试的结构、过程和结果:范围综述。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):802-814. doi: 10.1111/eje.12869. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
5
Assessing the utility and efficacy of e-OSCE among undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间医学生使用电子客观结构化临床考试的效用和效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03218-9.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of objective structured clinical examinations used in physical therapy licensure and a structured review of licensure practices in countries with well-developed regulation systems.一项关于物理治疗执照考试中使用的客观结构化临床考试的测量特性的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及对监管体系完善的国家的执照考试实践的结构化综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 3;16(8):e0255696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255696. eCollection 2021.
7
Are remote clinical assessments a feasible and acceptable method of assessment? A systematic review.远程临床评估是否是一种可行且可接受的评估方法?系统评价。
Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):300-308. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987403. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?客观结构化临床考试:医师考官能否远程参与?
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):441-50. doi: 10.1111/medu.12326.
9
Assessing Clinical Skills Via Telehealth Objective Standardized Clinical Examination: Feasibility, Acceptability, Comparability, and Educational Value.通过远程医疗客观标准化临床检查评估临床技能:可行性、可接受性、可比性和教育价值。
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Feb;28(2):248-257. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0094. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
A serious game for online-based objective structured clinical examination in nursing: A qualitative study.基于网络的客观结构化临床考试的严肃游戏:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105246. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105246. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Structured oral clinical assessment for pharmacotherapy competencies in medical education: a study of validity and reliability analyses of seven domains.医学教育中药物治疗能力的结构化口腔临床评估:七个领域的效度和信度分析研究
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Sep;37(3):331-343. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.345. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Exploring an online clinical competency assessment: an alternative to a traditional in-person assessment for internationally trained physiotherapists.探索在线临床能力评估:国际培训物理治疗师传统面对面评估的替代方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07559-z.
3
Conducting an objective structured clinical examination under COVID-restricted conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
A toolbox for conducting an online OSCE.一个用于开展在线客观结构化临床考试的工具箱。
Clin Teach. 2021 Jun;18(3):236-242. doi: 10.1111/tct.13285. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Remote Assessment of Clinical Skills During COVID-19: A Virtual, High-Stakes, Summative Pediatric Objective Structured Clinical Examination.COVID-19 期间临床技能的远程评估:一项虚拟、高风险、总结性的儿科客观结构化临床考试
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Aug;20(6):760-761. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
Telemedicine - maintaining quality during times of transition.
在 COVID 限制条件下进行客观结构化临床考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05774-8.
4
A level playing field? Evaluation of the virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine: A mixed methods study.公平竞争环境?精神病学和成瘾医学虚拟客观结构化临床考试的评估:混合方法研究。
Australas Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;32(4):359-364. doi: 10.1177/10398562241249567. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Feasibility and reliability of the pandemic-adapted online-onsite hybrid graduation OSCE in Japan.日本大流行适应型线上-线下混合毕业客观结构化临床考试的可行性和可靠性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):949-965. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10290-3. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Applying the Student Response System in the Online Dermatologic Video Curriculum on Medical Students' Interaction and Learning Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,将学生反应系统应用于在线皮肤病学视频课程对医学生互动及学习成果的影响
Indian J Dermatol. 2022 Jul-Aug;67(4):477. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_147_22.
7
Is online objective structured clinical examination teaching an acceptable replacement in post-COVID-19 medical education in the United Kingdom?: a descriptive study.在新冠疫情后,英国的医学教育中,线上客观结构化临床考试教学可否作为一种可接受的替代方式?一项描述性研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:30. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.30. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study.等 Z 标准设定法评估台湾医学学校客观结构化临床考试所需最少考站数:模拟研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.27. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Comparison of student pharmacists' performance on in-person vs. virtual OSCEs in a pre-APPE capstone course.在预 APPE 顶点课程中,比较学生药剂师在面对面与虚拟 OSCE 中的表现。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Sep;14(9):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.026. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
10
Evaluation of the Utility of Online Objective Structured Clinical Examination Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间在线客观结构化临床考试效用的评估
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Apr 28;13:407-418. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S357229. eCollection 2022.
远程医疗 - 转型时期的质量保障。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Jun 1;6(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0185-x.
4
Development and implementation of an e-visit objective structured clinical examination to evaluate student ability to provide care by telehealth.开发并实施电子访视客观结构化临床考试,以评估学生通过远程医疗提供护理的能力。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Apr 16;33(5):359-365. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000409.
5
Remote and onsite scoring of OSCEs using generalisability theory: A three-year cohort study.应用概化理论对客观结构化临床考试进行远程和现场评分:一项为期三年的队列研究。
Med Teach. 2019 May;41(5):578-583. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1508828. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
The implementation and evaluation of an e-Learning training module for objective structured clinical examination raters in Canada.加拿大针对客观结构化临床考试评分者的电子学习培训模块的实施与评估。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:18. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.18. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
8
Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia.在澳大利亚的客观结构化临床考试中,考官的资历和经验与沟通技能评分时的偏差有关,但与检查技能评分无关。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.17. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Comparing Real-time Versus Delayed Video Assessments for Evaluating ACGME Sub-competency Milestones in Simulated Patient Care Environments.在模拟患者护理环境中比较实时与延迟视频评估以评估美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)子能力里程碑。
Cureus. 2018 Mar 4;10(3):e2267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2267.
10
The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.客观结构化临床考试中考官的观察与见解。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec 27;14:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.34. eCollection 2017.