Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 May 31;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00624-1.
Differential diagnosis of tumour recurrence (TuR) from treatment effects (TrE), mostly induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, is still difficult by using conventional computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. We have investigated the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with 3 tracers, N-NH, F-FDOPA, and F-FDG, to identify TuR and TrE in glioma patients following treatment.
Forty-three patients with MR-suspected recurrent glioma were included. The maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of the lesion and the lesion-to-normal grey-matter cortex uptake (L/G) ratio were obtained from each tracer PET/CT. TuR or TrE was determined by histopathology or clinical MR follow-up for at least 6 months.
In this cohort, 34 patients were confirmed to have TuR, and 9 patients met the diagnostic standard of TrE. The SUVmax and SUVmean of N-NH and F-FDOPA PET/CT at TuR lesions were significantly higher compared with normal brain tissue (N-NH 0.696 ± 0.558, 0.625 ± 0.507 vs 0.486 ± 0.413; F-FDOPA 0.455 ± 0.518, 0.415 ± 0.477 vs 0.194 ± 0.203; both P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in F-FDG (6.918 ± 3.190, 6.016 ± 2.807 vs 6.356 ± 3.104, P = 0.290 and 0.493). L/G ratios of N-NH and F-FDOPA were significantly higher in TuR than in TrE group (N-NH 1.573 ± 0.099 vs 1.025 ± 0.128, P = 0.008; F-FDOPA, 2.729 ± 0.131 vs 1.514 ± 0.141, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and AUC (area under the curve) by ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis were 57.7%, 100% and 0.803, for N-NH; 84.6%, 100% and 0.938, for F-FDOPA; and 80.8%, 100%, and 0.952, for the combination, respectively.
Our results suggest that although multiple tracer PET/CT may improve differential diagnosis efficacy, for glioma TuR from TrE, F-FDOPA PET-CT is the most reliable. The combination of F-FDOPA and N-NH does not increase the diagnostic efficiency, while F-FDG is not worthy for differential diagnosis of glioma TuR and TrE.
通过常规计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MR)对肿瘤复发(TuR)与治疗效应(TrE)进行鉴别诊断仍然具有一定难度,这两种效应主要由放疗和化疗引起。我们研究了使用 3 种示踪剂(N-NH、F-FDOPA 和 F-FDG)的 PET/CT 对治疗后胶质瘤患者 TuR 和 TrE 的诊断性能。
纳入 43 例经 MRI 怀疑复发的胶质瘤患者。从每个示踪剂 PET/CT 中获得病变的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和平均标准化摄取值(SUVmean)以及病变与正常灰质皮质摄取比值(L/G)。通过组织病理学或至少 6 个月的临床 MRI 随访来确定 TuR 或 TrE。
在该队列中,34 例患者被证实存在 TuR,9 例患者符合 TrE 的诊断标准。TuR 病变的 N-NH 和 F-FDOPA PET/CT 的 SUVmax 和 SUVmean 明显高于正常脑组织(N-NH:0.696±0.558、0.625±0.507 比 0.486±0.413;F-FDOPA:0.455±0.518、0.415±0.477 比 0.194±0.203;均 P<0.01),但 F-FDG 无明显差异(6.918±3.190、6.016±2.807 比 6.356±3.104,P=0.290 和 0.493)。TuR 组的 L/G 比值明显高于 TrE 组(N-NH:1.573±0.099 比 1.025±0.128,P=0.008;F-FDOPA:2.729±0.131 比 1.514±0.141,P<0.001)。通过 ROC(受试者工作特征)分析,N-NH 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC(曲线下面积)分别为 57.7%、100%和 0.803;F-FDOPA 分别为 84.6%、100%和 0.938;联合应用时分别为 80.8%、100%和 0.952。
尽管多示踪剂 PET/CT 可能会提高鉴别诊断的效果,但对于胶质瘤的 TuR 与 TrE 相比,F-FDOPA PET-CT 是最可靠的。F-FDOPA 和 N-NH 的联合应用并未提高诊断效率,而 F-FDG 不适于鉴别诊断胶质瘤的 TuR 和 TrE。