Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics, TH Köln (University of Applied Sciences), Betzdorfer Strasse 2, 50679 Cologne, Germany.
Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics, TH Köln (University of Applied Sciences), Betzdorfer Strasse 2, 50679 Cologne, Germany.
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 1;130:93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 May 29.
By means of source-segregation, organic waste streams are deterred from mass-burning and more sustainable treatment paths may be enabled. This study analyzed the environmental and economic performance of custom treatment paths for organic waste streams in Germany towards energy generation. The reference quantity was the production and export of 1 kWh of exergy, while treating a certain amount of waste. The methodologies of environmental life cycle assessment (eLCA) and levelized costs of exergy (LCOE) were applied. The considered treatment systems were (i) anaerobic digestion, (ii) hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and (iii) incineration. The technologies were considered individually or in a cascade. The analyzed waste streams were the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), food waste and waste wood. For food waste and OFMSW, anaerobic digestion followed by the spreading of the digestate was characterized by overall beneficial environmental and economic properties. As the preferable treatment system was the same for both substrates, a separate collection of food waste was not considered worthwhile. For waste wood, the most environmentally friendly and economic option was direct incineration - either in a waste incinerator or in a lignite power plant. The implementation of an HTC process appeared viable for the treatment of OFMSW and food waste, both from an environmental and economic point of view. However, the energy intensive system must be outlined towards an environmentally friendly heat source. In this context, a cascading of anaerobic digestion with the HTC-process proofed to be an acceptable alternative.
通过源头分离,可以阻止有机废物进行大规模焚烧,并可能实现更可持续的处理途径。本研究分析了德国有机废物流向能源生产的定制处理途径的环境和经济性能。参考数量是生产和出口 1 千瓦时的等效功,同时处理一定量的废物。应用了环境生命周期评估 (eLCA) 和等效功的平准化成本 (LCOE) 方法。考虑的处理系统是 (i) 厌氧消化,(ii) 水热碳化 (HTC) 和 (iii) 焚烧。这些技术单独或级联考虑。分析的废物流是城市固体废物的有机部分 (OFMSW)、食物垃圾和废木材。对于食物垃圾和 OFMSW,厌氧消化后将消化物进行散布具有整体有利的环境和经济特性。由于这两种底物的首选处理系统相同,因此不需要单独收集食物垃圾。对于废木材,最环保和经济的选择是直接焚烧 - 无论是在垃圾焚烧炉还是褐煤发电厂。从环境和经济角度来看,HTC 工艺的实施似乎是处理 OFMSW 和食物垃圾的可行选择。然而,该能源密集型系统必须朝着环保热源进行规划。在这种情况下,厌氧消化与 HTC 工艺的级联被证明是一种可接受的替代方案。