• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业风险评估中安全与健康量表协调方法。

A Methodology for Harmonizing Safety and Health Scales in Occupational Risk Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury 8140, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 1;18(9):4849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094849.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18094849
PMID:34062816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8125366/
Abstract

Successful implementation of Health and Safety (H&S) systems requires an effective mechanism to assess risk. Existing methods focus primarily on measuring the safety aspect; the risk of an accident is determined based on the product of severity of consequence and likelihood of the incident arising. The health component, i.e., chronic harm, is more difficult to assess. Partially, this is due to both consequences and the likelihood of health issues, which may be indeterminate. There is a need to develop a quantitative risk measurement for H&S risk management and with better representation for chronic health issues. The present paper has approached this from a different direction, by adopting a public health perspective of quality of life. We have then changed the risk assessment process to accommodate this. This was then applied to a case study. The case study showed that merely including the chronic harm scales appeared to be sufficient to elicit a more detailed consideration of hazards for chronic harm. This suggests that people are not insensitive to chronic harm hazards, but benefit from having a framework in which to communicate them. A method has been devised to harmonize safety and harm risk assessments. The result was a comprehensive risk assessment method with consideration of safety accidents and chronic health issues. This has the potential to benefit industry by making chronic harm more visible and hence more preventable.

摘要

成功实施健康与安全(H&S)系统需要一个有效的风险评估机制。现有的方法主要侧重于衡量安全方面;事故风险是根据后果严重程度和事件发生可能性的乘积来确定的。健康方面,即慢性危害,更难评估。部分原因是后果和健康问题的可能性都不确定。需要开发一种用于 H&S 风险管理的定量风险测量方法,并更好地代表慢性健康问题。本文从一个不同的角度出发,采用了生活质量的公共卫生视角。然后,我们改变了风险评估过程以适应这一点。然后将其应用于案例研究。案例研究表明,仅仅包括慢性危害量表似乎足以更详细地考虑慢性危害的危害。这表明人们并非对慢性危害危害不敏感,而是受益于有一个可以用来传达这些危害的框架。已经设计出一种方法来协调安全和危害风险评估。其结果是一种综合的风险评估方法,同时考虑了安全事故和慢性健康问题。这有可能通过使慢性危害更加明显从而更可预防,从而使工业受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/fd32398e9a47/ijerph-18-04849-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/2f378892a32f/ijerph-18-04849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/99469563f9dc/ijerph-18-04849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/a45d8d322e64/ijerph-18-04849-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/17d4b6f86993/ijerph-18-04849-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/36931104df4f/ijerph-18-04849-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/fd32398e9a47/ijerph-18-04849-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/2f378892a32f/ijerph-18-04849-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/99469563f9dc/ijerph-18-04849-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/a45d8d322e64/ijerph-18-04849-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/17d4b6f86993/ijerph-18-04849-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/36931104df4f/ijerph-18-04849-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3574/8125366/fd32398e9a47/ijerph-18-04849-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Methodology for Harmonizing Safety and Health Scales in Occupational Risk Assessment.职业风险评估中安全与健康量表协调方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 1;18(9):4849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094849.
2
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
3
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
4
A model of Occupational Safety and Health Management System (OSHMS) for promoting and controlling health and safety in textile industry.一种用于促进和控制纺织行业健康与安全的职业安全与健康管理体系(OSHMS)模型。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.3233/THC-140866.
5
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
6
Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining.澳大利亚采矿业中的职业安全风险管理
Occup Med (Lond). 2004 Aug;54(5):311-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh074.
7
Estimating and controlling workplace risk: an approach for occupational hygiene and safety professionals.评估与控制工作场所风险:职业卫生与安全专业人员的一种方法
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002 Jul;17(7):477-85. doi: 10.1080/10473220290035660.
8
Hazard function deployment: a QFD-based tool for the assessment of working tasks - a practical study in the construction industry.危险函数部署:基于质量功能展开的工作任务评估工具——在建筑行业的实际研究。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Jun;26(2):348-369. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1483100. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Ensuring the quality of occupational safety risk assessment.确保职业安全风险评估的质量。
Risk Anal. 2013 Mar;33(3):409-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01898.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
10
Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.地表水和地下水中污染物的来源、途径及相对风险:为沃克顿调查准备的一份报告
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. doi: 10.1080/152873902753338572.

引用本文的文献

1
What Activity is the Most Dangerous to Work in? Estimation of the Risk Level of Economic Activities in Ecuador.从事何种活动工作最危险?厄瓜多尔经济活动风险水平评估。
Saf Health Work. 2025 Jun;16(2):172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.03.004. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Occupational health risk assessment of workplace solvents and noise in the electronics industry using three comprehensive risk assessment models.电子行业工作场所溶剂和噪声的职业健康风险评估采用三种综合风险评估模型。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;11:1063488. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1063488. eCollection 2023.
3
Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cumulative Risk Perspective for Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Professionals.职业健康与安全(OHS)专业人员的累积风险视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176342.
2
The Impact of Heavy Load Carrying on Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability Among Women in Shinyanga Region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚欣延加地区女性负重对肌肉骨骼疼痛和残疾的影响。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Feb 21;86(1):17. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2470.
3
Healing of Graves' Disease Thorough Lifestyle Changes: A Case Report.
中国职业健康风险评估方法:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1035996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of a Fast Test Based on Biometric Signals to Assess Mental Fatigue at the Workplace-A Pilot Study.基于生物识别信号评估工作场所精神疲劳的快速测试评估——一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211891.
Adv Mind Body Med. 2019;33(2):4-11.
4
Hazard function deployment: a QFD-based tool for the assessment of working tasks - a practical study in the construction industry.危险函数部署:基于质量功能展开的工作任务评估工具——在建筑行业的实际研究。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Jun;26(2):348-369. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1483100. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Disability adjusted life year (DALY): a useful tool for quantitative assessment of environmental pollution.伤残调整生命年(DALY):用于定量评估环境污染的有用工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:268-87. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.048. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
6
Association between ambient noise exposure, hearing acuity, and risk of acute occupational injury.环境噪声暴露、听力敏锐度与急性职业伤害风险之间的关联。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Jan;41(1):75-83. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3450. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0中文版(36项)在台湾地区的研制:效度与信度分析
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Nov;35(11):2812-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
8
Respiratory symptoms and lung function abnormalities related to work at a flavouring manufacturing facility.与香料制造工厂工作相关的呼吸道症状和肺功能异常。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Aug;71(8):549-54. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101927. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.制造业工人听力保护用品的使用情况:一项定性研究。
Noise Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(59):202-9. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.99896.
10
Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals.基于广义蝴蝶结的风险分析框架在海港和近海码头风险管理中的应用。
J Hazard Mater. 2011 Aug 30;192(2):465-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.035. Epub 2011 May 18.