Saharudin Mohd Shahneel, Hajnys Jiri, Kozior Tomasz, Gogolewski Damian, Zmarzły Paweł
Composites & Simulation Centre (CSC), Universiti Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Italy Design Institute (UniKL MIDI), Kuala Lumpur 56100, Malaysia.
Center of 3D Printing Protolab, Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB Technical University Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 May 21;13(11):1671. doi: 10.3390/polym13111671.
The paper presents the results of mechanical tests of models manufactured with two 3D printing technologies, FDM and CFF. Both technologies use PLA or PA-based materials reinforced with carbon fibers. The work includes both uniaxial tensile tests of the tested materials and metrological measurements of surfaces produced with two 3D printing technologies. The test results showed a significant influence of the type of technology on the strength of the models built and on the quality of the technological surface layer. After the analysis of the parameters of the primary profile, roughness and waviness, it can be clearly stated that the quality of the technological surface layer is much better for the models made with the CFF technology compared to the FDM technology. Furthermore, the tensile strength of the models manufactured of carbon fiber-enriched material is much higher for samples made with CFF technology compared to FDM.
本文展示了采用两种3D打印技术(熔融沉积成型(FDM)和连续纤维增强成型(CFF))制造的模型的力学测试结果。这两种技术均使用基于聚乳酸(PLA)或聚酰胺(PA)并由碳纤维增强的材料。这项工作包括对测试材料的单轴拉伸试验以及对用两种3D打印技术生产的表面进行计量测量。测试结果表明,技术类型对所构建模型的强度以及工艺表面层的质量有重大影响。在分析了原始轮廓、粗糙度和波纹度的参数后,可以明确指出,与FDM技术相比,采用CFF技术制作的模型的工艺表面层质量要好得多。此外,与FDM相比,采用CFF技术制作的由富含碳纤维材料制成的模型的拉伸强度要高得多。