Pitino Rosario, De Marchi Massimo, Manuelian Carmen L, Johnson Marion, Simoni Marica, Righi Federico, Tsiplakou Eleni
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, PR, Italy.
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Viale dell' Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 May 11;10(5):757. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050757.
Scientific evidence demonstrates that plant feed additives (PFA) can be a viable alternative to synthetic antioxidant vitamins in poultry nutrition. PFA are represented by plants, essential oils, plant extracts, and by-products from herbal or crop processing. The use of PFA in the feed industry has increased in recent years as their biologically active compounds (polyphenols) have demonstrated antimicrobial and antioxidant effects in food-producing animals. However, few trials have directly compared the effects of PFA with synthetic vitamins. After a systematic literature review of studies comparing the effects of PFA and synthetic vitamins on poultry products in the last 20 years (2000-2020), a total of 44 peer-reviewed articles were included in the present work. A positive effect of PFA on poultry products' oxidative stability during storage, organoleptic characteristics, and fatty acids profile has been observed without a specific impact on their performances. The effects of PFA are variable but often similar to those of vitamin E, suggesting the opportunity for a partial substitution of the latter in poultry diets.
科学证据表明,植物饲料添加剂(PFA)在禽类营养中可以成为合成抗氧化维生素的可行替代品。PFA包括植物、精油、植物提取物以及草药或作物加工的副产品。近年来,PFA在饲料行业的使用有所增加,因为其生物活性化合物(多酚)已在产肉动物中显示出抗菌和抗氧化作用。然而,很少有试验直接比较PFA与合成维生素的效果。在对过去20年(2000 - 2020年)比较PFA和合成维生素对禽产品影响的研究进行系统文献综述后,本研究共纳入了44篇经同行评审的文章。已观察到PFA对禽产品储存期间的氧化稳定性、感官特性和脂肪酸谱有积极影响,且对其生产性能没有特定影响。PFA的效果各不相同,但通常与维生素E的效果相似,这表明在家禽日粮中有机会部分替代后者。