Rosello Rocio, Berenguer Carmen, Martinez-Raga Jose, Miranda Ana, Cortese Samuele
Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, University Hospital Doctor Peset of Valencia, 46017 Valencia, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2021 May 20;10(10):2220. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102220.
Within the autistic spectrum, there is remarkable variability in the etiology, presentation, and treatment response. This prospective study was designed to identify, through cluster analysis, subgroups of individuals with ASD without intellectual disability (ID) based on the severity of the core symptoms in childhood. The secondary aim was to explore whether these subgroups and a group with typical development (TD) differ in cognitive, adaptive, and social aspects measured in adolescence. The sample at baseline was comprised of 52 children with ASD without ID and 37 children with TD, aged 7-11. Among the ASD group, three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (40%), 'high severity', presented high symptom severity on the DSM-5 criteria and the Social Communication Questionnaire. Cluster 2 (34%) showed 'moderate severity' on most of the scores. Cluster 3 (25%) corresponded to 'low severity', showing moderate social impairment and low restrictive, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests and activities. At 5-year follow-up, 45 adolescents with ASD without ID and 27 adolescents with TD were assessed. All clusters had significantly more difficulties in EF, ToM, socialization and adaptive behavior compared to TD. Social and adaptive trajectories between the ASD subgroups were relatively different; Cluster 3 showed poorer socialization and daily living skills than the other two subgroups. These findings highlight the importance of fully assessing social, cognitive, and adaptive profiles to develop care plans tailored to specific needs.
在自闭症谱系中,病因、表现和治疗反应存在显著差异。这项前瞻性研究旨在通过聚类分析,根据儿童期核心症状的严重程度,识别出无智力障碍(ID)的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体亚组。次要目的是探讨这些亚组与典型发育(TD)组在青春期所测量的认知、适应和社交方面是否存在差异。基线样本包括52名无ID的ASD儿童和37名TD儿童,年龄在7至11岁之间。在ASD组中,识别出三个聚类。聚类1(40%)为“高严重度”,在DSM-5标准和社交沟通问卷上表现出高症状严重度。聚类2(34%)在大多数分数上显示“中度严重度”。聚类3(25%)对应“低严重度”,表现出中度社交障碍以及低水平的限制性、重复性行为、兴趣和活动模式。在5年随访时,对45名无ID的ASD青少年和27名TD青少年进行了评估。与TD组相比,所有聚类在执行功能(EF)、心理理论(ToM)、社交和适应行为方面都有明显更多的困难。ASD亚组之间的社交和适应轨迹相对不同;聚类3在社交和日常生活技能方面比其他两个亚组更差。这些发现凸显了全面评估社交、认知和适应概况对于制定针对特定需求的护理计划的重要性。