• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两年间扩散模型参数的稳定性与变化

Stability and Change in Diffusion Model Parameters over Two Years.

作者信息

von Krause Mischa, Radev Stefan T, Voss Andreas, Quintus Martin, Egloff Boris, Wrzus Cornelia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Mainz University, 55122 Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

J Intell. 2021 May 12;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9020026.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence9020026
PMID:34066281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8162541/
Abstract

In recent years, mathematical models of decision making, such as the diffusion model, have been endorsed in individual differences research. These models can disentangle different components of the decision process, like processing speed, speed-accuracy trade-offs, and duration of non-decisional processes. The diffusion model estimates individual parameters of cognitive process components, thus allowing the study of individual differences. These parameters are often assumed to show trait-like properties, that is, within-person stability across tasks and time. However, the assumption of temporal stability has so far been insufficiently investigated. With this work, we explore stability and change in diffusion model parameters by following over 270 participants across a time period of two years. We analysed four different aspects of stability and change: rank-order stability, mean-level change, individual differences in change, and profile stability. Diffusion model parameters showed strong rank-order stability and mean-level changes in processing speed and speed-accuracy trade-offs that could be attributed to practice effects. At the same time, people differed little in these patterns across time. In addition, profiles of individual diffusion model parameters proved to be stable over time. We discuss implications of these findings for the use of the diffusion model in individual differences research.

摘要

近年来,诸如扩散模型等决策数学模型已在个体差异研究中得到认可。这些模型能够区分决策过程的不同组成部分,如处理速度、速度与准确性的权衡以及非决策过程的持续时间。扩散模型估计认知过程组成部分的个体参数,从而能够研究个体差异。这些参数通常被认为具有类似特质的属性,即在不同任务和时间内个体内部的稳定性。然而,时间稳定性的假设迄今为止尚未得到充分研究。通过这项研究,我们通过对270多名参与者进行为期两年的跟踪,探索扩散模型参数的稳定性和变化。我们分析了稳定性和变化的四个不同方面:排序稳定性、平均水平变化、变化中的个体差异以及剖面稳定性。扩散模型参数显示出很强的排序稳定性,以及处理速度和速度与准确性权衡方面的平均水平变化,这些变化可归因于练习效应。同时,人们在这些模式上随时间的差异很小。此外,个体扩散模型参数的剖面随着时间的推移被证明是稳定的。我们讨论了这些发现对扩散模型在个体差异研究中的应用的影响。

相似文献

1
Stability and Change in Diffusion Model Parameters over Two Years.两年间扩散模型参数的稳定性与变化
J Intell. 2021 May 12;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9020026.
2
Individual differences in emotion processing: how similar are diffusion model parameters across tasks?个体情绪加工差异:扩散模型参数在不同任务间的相似性如何?
Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1172-1183. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0953-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs and Adaptation Deficits in Aphasia: Finding the "Sweet Spot" Between Overly Cautious and Incautious Responding.失语症中的速度-准确性权衡与适应缺陷:在过于谨慎和轻率反应之间找到“最佳点”。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):259-277. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0156.
4
Do Non-Decision Times Mediate the Association between Age and Intelligence across Different Content and Process Domains?非决策时间是否在不同内容和过程领域中介导了年龄与智力之间的关联?
J Intell. 2020 Sep 1;8(3):33. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8030033.
5
Speed-accuracy manipulations and diffusion modeling: Lack of discriminant validity of the manipulation or of the parameter estimates?速度-准确性操作和扩散建模:操作或参数估计缺乏判别力?
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2568-2585. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1034-7.
6
Disentangling the Effects of Processing Speed on the Association between Age Differences and Fluid Intelligence.解析加工速度对年龄差异与流体智力之间关联的影响。
J Intell. 2019 Dec 25;8(1):1. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010001.
7
Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.从十六岁到六十六岁:跨越五十年的人格稳定性和变化的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Sep;117(3):674-695. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000210. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
A Diffusion Model Approach for Understanding the Impact of 17 Interventions on the Race Implicit Association Test.扩散模型方法探究 17 种干预措施对内隐联想测验种族效应的影响
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Sep;47(9):1374-1389. doi: 10.1177/0146167220974489. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Using Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience.运用决策模型加强对认知神经科学中个体差异的研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 9;7:81. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00081. eCollection 2016.
10
Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson's disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions.多巴胺能药物对帕金森病患者知觉决策的不同影响,作为任务难度和速度-准确性指令的函数。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural superstatistics for Bayesian estimation of dynamic cognitive models.用于动态认知模型贝叶斯估计的神经超统计
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 23;13(1):13778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40278-3.
2
Neurocomputational models of altruistic decision-making and social motives: Advances, pitfalls, and future directions.神经计算模型在利他决策和社会动机中的应用:进展、陷阱和未来方向。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;12(6):e1571. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1571. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily life processes predict long-term development in explicit and implicit representations of Big Five traits: Testing predictions from the TESSERA (Triggering situations, Expectancies, States and State Expressions, and ReActions) framework.日常生活过程预测大五人格特质的内隐和外显表现的长期发展:从 TESSERA(触发情境、期望、状态和状态表达以及反应)框架测试预测。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;120(4):1049-1073. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000361. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
Do Non-Decision Times Mediate the Association between Age and Intelligence across Different Content and Process Domains?非决策时间是否在不同内容和过程领域中介导了年龄与智力之间的关联?
J Intell. 2020 Sep 1;8(3):33. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8030033.
3
Age differences in diffusion model parameters: a meta-analysis.
年龄对扩散模型参数的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):2012-2021. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01371-8. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
4
Diffusion modeling and intelligence: Drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence.扩散模型与智力:漂移率与智力表现出既有领域一般性又有领域特殊性的关系。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Dec;149(12):2207-2249. doi: 10.1037/xge0000774. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Disentangling the Effects of Processing Speed on the Association between Age Differences and Fluid Intelligence.解析加工速度对年龄差异与流体智力之间关联的影响。
J Intell. 2019 Dec 25;8(1):1. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010001.
6
Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.贝叶斯结构方程模型适配指数的调整:与最大似然法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Feb;25(1):46-70. doi: 10.1037/met0000224. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Cognitive Models in Intelligence Research: Advantages and Recommendations for Their Application.情报研究中的认知模型:优势及其应用建议
J Intell. 2018 Jul 17;6(3):34. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030034.
8
Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious.扩散建模中的模型复杂性:使模型更简洁的益处。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 13;7:1324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01324. eCollection 2016.
9
People adopt optimal policies in simple decision-making, after practice and guidance.经过实践和指导后,人们在简单决策中会采用最优策略。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):597-606. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1135-1.
10
Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.拉特克利夫扩散模型参数的重测信度。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):629-652. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0770-5. Epub 2016 Apr 23.