• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于家务活动的获得性脑损伤患者智力功能评估:一种职业治疗方法的开发与评价

A housework-based assessment of intellectual functions in patients with acquired brain damage. Development and evaluation of an occupational therapy method.

作者信息

Söderback I

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(2):57-69.

PMID:3406682
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop and evaluate a housework-based method of selecting, from among adults with acquired brain damage, those who would benefit from housework-based training; and of assessing the effects of such training. The method presented--the Intellectual Housework Assessment (IHA)--consists of two parallel programmes of seven subtests, each including eight observation points. There is also a manual. The reliability of the IHA was tested in a group of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) patients. Construct validity was studied by calculating the mean IHA difference between the patient group and a group of nonclinical persons. Concurrent validity was studied through comparison with the Intellectual Function Assessment (IFA), with a psychometric test battery and with an ADL status. The results of the study indicate that IHA is an adequate instrument for the purposes specified.

摘要

该研究的目的是开发并评估一种基于家务活动的方法,用于从后天性脑损伤的成年人中筛选出能从基于家务活动的训练中获益的人;并评估此类训练的效果。所提出的方法——智力家务评估(IHA)——由两个平行的包含七个子测试的程序组成,每个子测试包含八个观察点。此外还有一本手册。IHA的信度在一组脑血管意外(CVA)患者中进行了测试。通过计算患者组与一组非临床人员之间的IHA平均差异来研究结构效度。通过与智力功能评估(IFA)、一套心理测量测试组合以及日常生活活动(ADL)状态进行比较来研究同时效度。研究结果表明,IHA是用于上述特定目的的一种合适工具。

相似文献

1
A housework-based assessment of intellectual functions in patients with acquired brain damage. Development and evaluation of an occupational therapy method.基于家务活动的获得性脑损伤患者智力功能评估:一种职业治疗方法的开发与评价
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(2):57-69.
2
The effectiveness of training intellectual functions in adults with acquired brain damage. An evaluation of occupational therapy methods.对后天性脑损伤成人进行智力功能训练的有效性。职业治疗方法评估。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(2):47-56.
3
Intellectual Function Training in adults with acquired brain damage. Evaluation.获得性脑损伤成人的智力功能训练。评估。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(4):147-53.
4
Intellectual Function Training in adults with acquired brain damage. An occupational therapy method.获得性脑损伤成人的智力功能训练。一种职业治疗方法。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(4):139-46.
5
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
Training sensory awareness and spatial organization in people with right brain damage.对右脑损伤患者进行感觉意识和空间组织训练。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Nov;60(11):491-6.
7
[Psychometric analyses of occupational therapy assessment].
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Jun;64(6):343-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32180.
8
Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview.日常生活活动量表的可靠性及其在电话访谈中的应用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Oct;68(10):723-8.
9
Perceptual remediation in patients with right brain damage: a comprehensive program.右脑损伤患者的知觉修复:一个综合方案。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Jun;66(6):353-9.
10
Validity and reliability of the instrument Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living (PS-ADL) and its clinical applicability to adults with rheumatoid arthritis.日常生活活动表现与满意度量表(PS-ADL)的有效性、可靠性及其在类风湿性关节炎成人患者中的临床适用性。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2008 Mar;15(1):13-22. doi: 10.1080/11038120701223165.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding the ecological validity of WAIS-IV and WMS-IV with the Texas functional living scale.用德克萨斯功能性生活量表拓展韦氏智力测验第四版和韦氏记忆测验第四版的生态有效性。
Assessment. 2011 Jun;18(2):141-55. doi: 10.1177/1073191110382843. Epub 2010 Oct 4.