• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨联合 Nab-紫杉醇与 FOLFIRINOX 在转移性胰腺癌中的等效疗效但安全性特征不同。

Equivalent Efficacy but Different Safety Profiles of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"-IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy.

Unit of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Biomolecules. 2021 May 22;11(6):780. doi: 10.3390/biom11060780.

DOI:10.3390/biom11060780
PMID:34067288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224606/
Abstract

FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GN) are the most common chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). They have not been compared each other in a prospective trial, but only in retrospective studies, which can thus be affected by several biases. In order to overcome these biases, we took advantage of matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), that allows an indirect comparison by reducing cross-trial differences, and compared data from 268 patients treated with GN in a real-world setting with data from the 171 patients included in the FFX arm of the PRODIGE trial. Survival outcomes did not differ between the two populations. Overall survival was 11.1 months for both treatments (hazard ratio (HR) of FFX 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.49; = 0.527). Progression-free survival was 6.0 months with GN and 6.4 months with FFX (HR of FFX 1.11, 95% CI 0.82-1.50; = 0.520). On the other hand, we observed a difference in the toxicity profiles: grade 3/4 anemia was more frequent with GN, whereas a higher occurrence of grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhea was reported with FFX. FFX and GN show an equivalent efficacy but different safety profiles in the first-line therapy of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Searching for reliable predictive biomarkers is advised in order to improve therapeutic strategy in metastatic PC.

摘要

FOLFIRINOX (FFX) 和吉西他滨+白蛋白紫杉醇(GN)是转移性胰腺癌(PC)一线治疗中最常用的化疗方案。它们没有在前瞻性试验中进行相互比较,而只是在回顾性研究中进行了比较,这些研究可能受到多种偏倚的影响。为了克服这些偏倚,我们利用了匹配调整间接比较(MAIC),通过减少试验间差异来进行间接比较,并将在真实环境中接受 GN 治疗的 268 名患者的数据与 PRODIGE 试验中 FFX 臂纳入的 171 名患者的数据进行了比较。两种治疗方法的生存结果没有差异。两种治疗的总生存期均为 11.1 个月(FFX 的危险比(HR)为 1.10,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.81-1.49;= 0.527)。无进展生存期 GN 组为 6.0 个月,FFX 组为 6.4 个月(FFX 的 HR 为 1.11,95% CI 为 0.82-1.50;= 0.520)。另一方面,我们观察到毒性特征存在差异:GN 组更常见 3/4 级贫血,而 FFX 组报告的 3/4 级呕吐和腹泻发生率更高。FFX 和 GN 在转移性胰腺癌的一线治疗中显示出等效的疗效,但安全性特征不同。建议寻找可靠的预测生物标志物,以改善转移性 PC 的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b87/8224606/8aa051721813/biomolecules-11-00780-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b87/8224606/90e0aaaf8445/biomolecules-11-00780-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b87/8224606/8aa051721813/biomolecules-11-00780-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b87/8224606/90e0aaaf8445/biomolecules-11-00780-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b87/8224606/8aa051721813/biomolecules-11-00780-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Equivalent Efficacy but Different Safety Profiles of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.吉西他滨联合 Nab-紫杉醇与 FOLFIRINOX 在转移性胰腺癌中的等效疗效但安全性特征不同。
Biomolecules. 2021 May 22;11(6):780. doi: 10.3390/biom11060780.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨与 FOLFIRINOX 方案治疗转移性胰腺癌的疗效比较:美国全国回顾性图表审查。
Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1564-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. FOLFIRINOX for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇对比 FOLFIRINOX 方案用于晚期胰腺癌患者。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;82(2):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3611-y. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Comparison between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel including sequential treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching approach.FOLFIRINOX 与吉西他滨加 nab-紫杉醇(含序贯治疗)治疗转移性胰腺癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 11;21(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08277-7.
5
Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.比较 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌:使用韩国胰腺癌(K-PaC)登记处。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):654-659. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000730.
6
FOLFIRINOX for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients After Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Failure.纳武单抗联合吉西他滨治疗失败后,FOLFIRINOX方案用于晚期胰腺癌患者
Pancreas. 2020 Apr;49(4):574-578. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001534.
7
Real-world outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based propensity score-weighted analysis.真实世界中 FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨和白蛋白紫杉醇在晚期胰腺癌中的疗效:基于人群的倾向评分加权分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):160-169. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2705. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting.真实世界环境下 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的临床结局。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Apr;23(4):812-819. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02473-w. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel and Modified FOLFIRINOX for First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Propensity Score Matching.吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇与改良 FOLFIRINOX 一线治疗转移性和复发性胰腺癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配。
Pancreas. 2021 Apr 1;50(4):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001801.
10
Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Observational Study (NAPOLEON Study).吉西他滨联合 Nab-紫杉醇对比 FOLFIRINOX 方案治疗局部进展期不可切除胰腺癌的多中心观察性研究(NAPOLEON 研究)。
Pancreas. 2021 Aug 1;50(7):957-964. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001859.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approaches to Pancreatic Cancer According to the Resectability Status.根据可切除性状态的胰腺癌多学科治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1167. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041167.
2
The Initial Journey of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PaCTO Project): A Nationwide Survey among Portuguese Specialist Physicians.转移性胰腺癌患者的初始旅程(PaCTO项目):一项针对葡萄牙专科医生的全国性调查。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 5;31(4):262-272. doi: 10.1159/000533178. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Folfirinox vs. Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
A multicenter propensity score analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the NAPOLEON study.一项针对转移性胰腺癌患者使用FOLFIRINOX方案与吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案的多中心倾向评分分析:来自NAPOLEON研究的结果。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 May;26(5):941-950. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01859-2. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Folfirinox方案与吉西他滨+纳米白蛋白紫杉醇作为胰腺癌一线治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Oncol. 2023 Oct;14(5):325-339. doi: 10.14740/wjon1604. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of DPYD, UGT, CDA, and ABCB1 polymorphisms in pancreatic cancer patients receiving mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.
胰腺癌患者接受 mFOLFIRINOX 或吉西他滨联合 nab-紫杉醇治疗时 DPYD、UGT、CDA 和 ABCB1 多态性的综合遗传药理学分析。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2021 Apr;21(2):233-242. doi: 10.1038/s41397-020-00203-7. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
4
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus folfirinox in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in china.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨对比 FOLFIRINOX 方案治疗中国转移性胰腺癌的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):691-697. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1812386. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Comparison of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白紫杉醇与FOLFIRINOX方案治疗转移性胰腺癌的比较
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 6;8(17):3718-3729. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3718.
7
Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.比较 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌:使用韩国胰腺癌(K-PaC)登记处。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):654-659. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000730.
8
Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting.真实世界环境下 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的临床结局。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Apr;23(4):812-819. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02473-w. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Meta-analysis examining overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with second-line 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based therapy after failing first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy: effect of performance status and comparison with other regimens.分析二线氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂联合治疗在一线吉西他滨治疗失败的胰腺癌患者总生存期的荟萃分析:体力状况的影响及与其他方案的比较。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07110-x.
10
Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis.对于不可切除或转移性胰腺导管腺癌,在FOLFIRINOX方案进展后二线使用纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨的疗效和安全性:多中心回顾性分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 May 27;12:1758835920923424. doi: 10.1177/1758835920923424. eCollection 2020.