• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transfer and Implementation Process of a Good Practice in Workplace Health Promotion.工作场所健康促进良好实践的转移与实施过程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105254.
2
Health Promotion Interventions: Lessons from the Transfer of Good Practices in CHRODIS-PLUS.健康促进干预措施:CHRODIS-PLUS 良好实践转移的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041281.
3
A comparative analysis of occupational health and safety risk prevention practices in Sweden and Spain.瑞典和西班牙的职业健康和安全风险预防措施的比较分析。
J Safety Res. 2013 Dec;47:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
4
Lessons from the Implementation of Pilot Practices to Tackle the Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases in Europe.欧洲应对非传染性疾病负担的试点实践经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134661.
5
Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers: a RE-AIM approach.基于工作场所的健康促进和锻炼的群组随机试验的过程评估,以提高生产力和减少办公室工作人员的颈部疼痛:RE-AIM 方法。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9.
6
Workplace health promotion programs for older workers in Italy.意大利针对老年工人的工作场所健康促进计划。
Med Lav. 2017 Oct 27;108(5):396-405. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i5.6229.
7
Fostering the Quality of Care for People with Chronic Diseases, from Theory to Practice: The Development of Good Practices in Disease Prevention and Care in JA CHRODIS PLUS Using JA CHRODIS Recommendations and Quality Criteria.促进慢性病患者的护理质量,从理论到实践:在 JA CHRODIS PLUS 中使用 JA CHRODIS 建议和质量标准制定疾病预防和护理方面的良好实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030951.
8
Workplace mental health: An international review of guidelines.工作场所心理健康:指南的国际综述。
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
9
[A review of measures taken to improve organizational wellbeing in Italy].[对意大利为改善组织福祉所采取措施的综述]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2014 Jan-Mar;36(1):54-64.
10
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(报告质量改进卓越性的标准):经过详细共识过程修订的发布指南。
Can J Diabetes. 2015 Oct;39(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of an integrated workplace health promotion program in Dutch organizations - A mixed methods process evaluation.在荷兰组织中实施综合工作场所健康促进计划 - 混合方法过程评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):e0308856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308856. eCollection 2024.
2
Precision prevention in occupational health: a conceptual analysis and development of a unified understanding and an integrative framework.精准预防在职业健康中的应用:概念分析及统一理解和综合框架的构建。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;12:1444521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444521. eCollection 2024.
3
Recent Advances and Perspectives in Anesthesiology: Towards Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications.麻醉学的最新进展与展望:迈向基于人工智能的应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 24;13(15):4316. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154316.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs: Employers' perceptions.工作场所健康促进计划实施的障碍和促进因素:雇主的看法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1035064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035064. eCollection 2022.
5
A study protocol of the adaptation and evaluation by means of a cluster-RCT of an integrated workplace health promotion program based on a European good practice.一项基于欧洲良好实践的综合工作场所健康促进计划的适应性和评估的研究方案,采用集群 RCT 方法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 21;22(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13352-0.
6
An exploration of the political, social, economic and cultural factors affecting how different global regions initially reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic.对影响全球不同地区最初应对新冠疫情方式的政治、社会、经济和文化因素的探究。
Interface Focus. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):20210079. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0079. eCollection 2022 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for Effective Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion Interventions: Results from Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS Work Package 5 Activities.促进健康干预措施中有效跨部门合作的建议:联合行动 CHRODIS-PLUS 工作包 5 活动的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(18):6474. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186474.
2
Lessons from the Implementation of Pilot Practices to Tackle the Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases in Europe.欧洲应对非传染性疾病负担的试点实践经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134661.
3
Health Promotion Interventions: Lessons from the Transfer of Good Practices in CHRODIS-PLUS.健康促进干预措施:CHRODIS-PLUS 良好实践转移的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041281.
4
A Methodological Approach for Implementing an Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model: Results from the Pre-Implementation Stage of Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS.一种实施综合多病种护理模式的方法学途径:联合行动 CHRODIS-PLUS 预实施阶段的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245044.
5
Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家按年龄、性别和死因分类的死亡率,195 个国家和地区,1980-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.公共卫生干预措施的投资回报:系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-834. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208141. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?工作场所健康促进(健康养生)计划是否有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Sep;56(9):927-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276.
8
The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs.工作场所健康促进项目中投资回报率与研究方法质量之间的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(6):347-63. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-LIT-395.
9
A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback.一项针对工作场所健康促进选定干预措施的系统评价。健康风险评估与反馈。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030.
10
The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: a systematic review.工作场所营养与身体活动干预对控制员工超重和肥胖的有效性:一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):340-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.003.

工作场所健康促进良好实践的转移与实施过程。

Transfer and Implementation Process of a Good Practice in Workplace Health Promotion.

机构信息

Servicio de Promoción y Acción Local en Salud, Dirección General de Salud Pública y Ordenación Farmacéutica, Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía, 41020 Sevilla, Spain.

EuroHealthNet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105254.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18105254
PMID:34069229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8155958/
Abstract

The procedure developed by the European Joint Action CHRODIS PLUS (JAC+) to transfer and implement good practices from one setting to another was tested in the context of a workplace health promotion good practice identified in the Region of Lombardy (Italy) and transferred and implemented in two organisations in Andalusia (Spain). This article provides a detailed account on how the JAC+ implementation methodology, which included the use of the SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines, was applied. It offers a practical overview for the uptake of this methodology and of the good practice itself. The account of how this systematic and rigorous implementation reporting model was applied can be of value to those with an interest in workplace health and in the transfer of good practice and implementation sciences.

摘要

由欧洲联合行动 CHRODIS PLUS(JAC+)制定的将良好实践从一个环境转移和实施到另一个环境的程序,在伦巴第大区(意大利)确定的工作场所健康促进良好实践的背景下进行了测试,并在安达卢西亚的两个组织中进行了转移和实施。本文详细介绍了如何应用 JAC+实施方法,包括使用 SQUIRE(卓越质量改进报告标准)指南。它提供了对该方法和良好实践本身的实际概述。本报告介绍了如何应用这种系统和严格的实施报告模式,这对于那些对工作场所健康以及良好实践和实施科学的转移感兴趣的人来说具有价值。