• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在为期五天的运动任务训练期间,对M1区进行反向极性双靶点直流电刺激不会影响运动学习。一项三盲临床试验。

Reversed Polarity bi-tDCS over M1 during a Five Days Motor Task Training Did Not Influence Motor Learning. A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Flix-Díez Laura, Delicado-Miralles Miguel, Gurdiel-Álvarez Francisco, Velasco Enrique, Galán-Calle María, Lerma Lara Sergio

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia (UV), 46003 Valencia, Spain.

Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (UMH-CSIC), 03550 Sant Joant d'Alacant, Spain.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 May 25;11(6):691. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060691.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci11060691
PMID:34070256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8225177/
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as a way of improving motor learning. Our purpose was to explore the reversal bilateral tDCS effects on manual dexterity training, during five days, with the retention component measured after 5 days to determine whether somatosensory effects were produced. In this randomized, triple-blind clinical trial, 28 healthy subjects (14 women) were recruited and randomized into tDCS and placebo groups, although only 23 participants (13 women) finished the complete protocol. Participants received the real or placebo treatment during five consecutive days, while performing a motor dexterity training program of 20 min. The motor dexterity and the sensitivity of the hand were assessed pre- and post-day 1, post 5 days of training, and 5 days after training concluded. Training improved motor dexterity, but tDCS only produced a tendency to improve retention. The intervention did not produce changes in the somatosensory variables assessed. Thus, reversal bi-tDCS had no effects during motor learning on healthy subjects, but it could favor the retention of the motor skills acquired. These results do not support the cooperative inter-hemispheric model.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被作为一种改善运动学习的方法进行研究。我们的目的是探讨在为期五天的手动灵巧性训练中反向双侧tDCS的效果,并在五天后测量记忆成分,以确定是否产生了体感效应。在这项随机、三盲临床试验中,招募了28名健康受试者(14名女性)并随机分为tDCS组和安慰剂组,不过只有23名参与者(13名女性)完成了完整方案。参与者在连续五天接受真实或安慰剂治疗的同时,进行一项20分钟的运动灵巧性训练计划。在训练第1天前后、训练5天后以及训练结束5天后,对运动灵巧性和手部敏感性进行评估。训练改善了运动灵巧性,但tDCS仅产生了改善记忆的倾向。该干预并未使所评估的体感变量发生变化。因此,反向双侧tDCS在健康受试者的运动学习过程中没有效果,但可能有利于所获得运动技能的记忆。这些结果不支持半球间合作模型。

相似文献

1
Reversed Polarity bi-tDCS over M1 during a Five Days Motor Task Training Did Not Influence Motor Learning. A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.在为期五天的运动任务训练期间,对M1区进行反向极性双靶点直流电刺激不会影响运动学习。一项三盲临床试验。
Brain Sci. 2021 May 25;11(6):691. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060691.
2
Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?双侧经颅直流电刺激增强运动学习:极性或电流方向的影响?
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):2119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
3
Transcranial direct current stimulation of the premotor cortex: effects on hand dexterity.经颅直流电刺激运动前区皮质:对手部灵活性的影响。
Brain Res. 2014 Aug 12;1576:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
4
Learning a Bimanual Cooperative Skill in Chronic Stroke Under Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经非侵入性脑刺激的慢性中风患者的双手协调技能学习:一项随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Jun;33(6):486-498. doi: 10.1177/1545968319847963. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
Combined motor point associative stimulation (MPAS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improves plateaued manual dexterity performance.联合运动点关联刺激(MPAS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可改善停滞不前的手部灵巧性表现。
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Oct 28;633:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Age- and task-dependent effects of cerebellar tDCS on manual dexterity and motor learning-A preliminary study.年龄和任务依赖性对小脑 tDCS 对手动灵巧性和运动学习的影响-初步研究。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2022 Oct;52(5):354-365. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
7
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation combined to a resistance training program in chronic stroke survivors: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.双侧经颅直流电刺激联合抗阻训练对慢性脑卒中幸存者的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(4):333-346. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190908.
8
Differential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on antiphase and inphase motor tasks: A pilot study.经颅直流电刺激对反相和同相运动任务的差异影响:一项初步研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Jul 2;366:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation.无需训练即可改善运动表现:镜像视觉反馈与经颅直流电刺激相结合的效果
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2383-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00832.2014. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children.经颅直流电刺激可增强儿童的运动学习能力。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in human motor Optimization: Mechanisms, safety, and emerging applications.人类运动优化中的经颅电刺激(TES):机制、安全性及新兴应用
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025 Jun 2;43:102055. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102055. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Temporal Dynamics of Adverse Effects across Five Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.经颅直流电刺激五疗程不良反应的时间动态变化
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 30;14(5):457. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050457.
3
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effects on Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and Nociceptive Processing in Healthy Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold changes during motor learning.运动学习过程中体感时间辨别阈的变化。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2020 Dec;37(4):313-319. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2020.1830755. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Economic burden of stroke across Europe: A population-based cost analysis.欧洲中风的经济负担:基于人群的成本分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2020 Mar;5(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/2396987319883160. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
The comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning and motor performance: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对健康受试者定量感觉测试(QST)和伤害性处理的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14(1):9. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010009.
单侧和双侧经颅直流电刺激对运动学习和运动表现的比较影响:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb;72:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Non-invasive Motor Cortex Neuromodulation Reduces Secondary Hyperalgesia and Enhances Activation of the Descending Pain Modulatory Network.非侵入性运动皮层神经调节可减轻继发性痛觉过敏并增强下行性疼痛调节网络的激活。
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 8;13:467. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00467. eCollection 2019.
5
Effects of tDCS on Bimanual Motor Skills: A Brief Review.经颅直流电刺激对双手运动技能的影响:简要综述。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr 4;12:63. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00063. eCollection 2018.
6
Commentary: Cooperation Not Competition: Bihemispheric tDCS and fMRI Show Role for Ipsilateral Hemisphere in Motor Learning.评论:合作而非竞争:双侧半球经颅直流电刺激与功能磁共振成像显示同侧半球在运动学习中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 15;12:97. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00097. eCollection 2018.
7
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries.对临床实践指南进行系统评价,以确定中风和其他后天性脑损伤后康复的推荐建议。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e018791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791.
8
Hand Rehabilitation Robotics on Poststroke Motor Recovery.手部康复机器人技术对脑卒中后运动恢复的影响
Behav Neurol. 2017;2017:3908135. doi: 10.1155/2017/3908135. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Circuit changes in motor cortex during motor skill learning.运动技能学习过程中运动皮层的回路变化。
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 1;368:283-297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Cooperation Not Competition: Bihemispheric tDCS and fMRI Show Role for Ipsilateral Hemisphere in Motor Learning.合作而非竞争:双侧半球经颅直流电刺激和功能磁共振成像显示同侧半球在运动学习中的作用
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 2;37(31):7500-7512. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3414-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 3.