Tsirigotis Panagiotis, Gkirkas Konstantinos, Kitsiou Vassiliki, Chondropoulos Spiros, Athanassiades Theofilos, Thomopoulos Thomas, Tsirogianni Alexandra, Stamouli Maria, Karagiannidi Aggeliki, Siafakas Nikolaos, Pappa Vassiliki, Nagler Arnon
Second Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKO General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Evangelismos General Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 30;13(11):2699. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112699.
Patients with high-risk acute leukemia have a high risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In an effort to reduce the relapse rate, various therapeutic methods have been implemented into clinical practice. Among them, prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pro-DLI) has shown significant efficacy. However, the widespread application of pro-DLI has been restricted mostly due to concerns regarding the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we tested the safety and efficacy of a novel method of prophylactic-DLI based by repetitive administration of low lymphocyte doses.
DLI was administered to patients with high-risk acute leukemia at a dose of 2 × 10/kg CD3-positive cells. DLI at the same dose was repeated every two months for at least 36 months post-allo-SCT, or until relapse or any clinical or laboratory feature suggested GVHD, whichever occurred first. Forty-four patients with a median age of 53 years (range 20-67) who underwent allo-SCT between 2011 and 2020 were included in our study. Thirty-three patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 11 with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allo-SCT from a matched sibling (MSD, no = 38 pts) or a matched-unrelated donor (MUD, no = 6 pts) received pro-DLI. Twenty-three patients were in CR1, all with unfavorable genetic features; 12 patients were in CR2 or beyond; and 9 patients had refractory disease at the time of transplant. Ten out of 23 patients in CR1 had detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of allo-SCT. Disease risk index (DRI) was high and intermediate in 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) in 36 and reduced intensity (RIC) in 8 patients, while GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine-A in combination with low-dose alemtuzumab in 39 patients or with low-dose MTX in 5 patients, respectively.
Thirty-five patients completed the scheduled treatment and received a median of 8 DLI doses (range 1-35). Fifteen out of 35 patients received all planned doses, while DLI was discontinued in 20 patients. Reasons for discontinuation included GVHD development in nine, donor unavailability in seven, disease relapse in three, and secondary malignancy in one patient, respectively. Nine patients were still on treatment with DLI, and they received a median of four (range 2-12) doses. Fourteen percent of patients developed transient grade-II acute GVHD while 12% developed chronic GVHD post-DLI administration. Acute GVHD was managed successfully with short course steroids, and four out of five patients with cGVHD were disease-free and off immunosuppression. With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 8-120), relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74%, (95% CI, 54-87%) and 78%, (95% CI, 58-89%) respectively, while the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 13% (95% CI, 4-28%). The cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with intermediate and high DRI is 7% and 15%, respectively.
Prolonged-up to three years-low-dose pro-DLI administered every two months is safe and effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. The low-dose repetitive administration DLI strategy reduced the risk of DLI-mediated GVHD, while the prolonged repeated administration helped in preventing relapse, possibly by inducing a sustained and prolonged immunological pressure on residual leukemic cells. This novel strategy deserves testing in larger cohort of patients with high-risk acute leukemia.
高危急性白血病患者在异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)后有很高的复发风险。为降低复发率,各种治疗方法已应用于临床实践。其中,预防性供体淋巴细胞输注(pro-DLI)已显示出显著疗效。然而,pro-DLI的广泛应用大多受到对移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生的担忧的限制。在本研究中,我们测试了一种基于低淋巴细胞剂量重复给药的新型预防性DLI方法的安全性和有效性。
以2×10/kg CD3阳性细胞的剂量对高危急性白血病患者进行DLI。在allo-SCT后至少36个月内,每两个月重复给予相同剂量的DLI,或直至复发或出现任何提示GVHD的临床或实验室特征,以先发生者为准。我们的研究纳入了2011年至2020年间接受allo-SCT的44例患者,中位年龄为53岁(范围20-67岁)。33例高危急性髓系白血病(AML)患者和11例高危急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者在接受来自匹配同胞(MSD,n = 38例)或匹配无关供体(MUD,n = 6例)的allo-SCT后接受了pro-DLI。23例患者处于CR1期,均具有不良遗传特征;12例患者处于CR2期或更晚期;9例患者在移植时患有难治性疾病。23例CR1期患者中有10例在allo-SCT时可检测到微小残留病(MRD)。疾病风险指数(DRI)在21例和23例患者中分别为高和中。36例患者采用清髓性预处理(MAC),8例患者采用减低强度预处理(RIC),而GVHD预防分别在39例患者中采用环孢素A联合低剂量阿仑单抗或在5例患者中采用低剂量甲氨蝶呤。
35例患者完成了预定治疗,接受的DLI剂量中位数为8次(范围1-35次)。35例患者中有15例接受了所有计划剂量,而20例患者停止了DLI。停药原因分别包括9例发生GVHD、7例供体不可用、3例疾病复发和1例患者发生继发性恶性肿瘤。9例患者仍在接受DLI治疗,他们接受的剂量中位数为4次(范围2-12次)。14%的患者发生了短暂的II级急性GVHD,而12%的患者在DLI给药后发生了慢性GVHD。急性GVHD通过短期使用类固醇成功控制,5例cGVHD患者中有4例无病且停用了免疫抑制剂。中位随访44个月(范围8-120个月),无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为74%(95%CI,54-87%)和78%(95%CI,58-89%),而非复发死亡率(NRM)的累积发生率为13%(95%CI,4-28%)。DRI为中、高的患者的复发累积发生率分别为7%和15%。
每两个月给予长达三年的低剂量pro-DLI在降低高危急性白血病患者的复发率方面是安全有效的。低剂量重复给药的DLI策略降低了DLI介导的GVHD风险,而长期重复给药有助于预防复发,可能是通过对残留白血病细胞施加持续和延长的免疫压力。这种新策略值得在更大规模的高危急性白血病患者队列中进行测试。