• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能鉴别诊断列表对医生鉴别诊断的影响:一项随机对照研究数据的探索性分析。

Effects of a Differential Diagnosis List of Artificial Intelligence on Differential Diagnoses by Physicians: An Exploratory Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, Nagano Chuo Hospital, Nagano 380-0814, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115562.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18115562
PMID:34070958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8196999/
Abstract

A diagnostic decision support system (DDSS) is expected to reduce diagnostic errors. However, its effect on physicians' diagnostic decisions remains unclear. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of diagnoses from artificial intelligence (AI) in physicians' differential diagnoses when using AI-driven DDSS that generates a differential diagnosis from the information entered by the patient before the clinical encounter on physicians' differential diagnoses. In this randomized controlled study, an exploratory analysis was performed. Twenty-two physicians were required to generate up to three differential diagnoses per case by reading 16 clinical vignettes. The participants were divided into two groups, an intervention group, and a control group, with and without a differential diagnosis list of AI, respectively. The prevalence of physician diagnosis identical with the differential diagnosis of AI (primary outcome) was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (70.2% vs. 55.1%, < 0.001). The primary outcome was significantly >10% higher in the intervention group than in the control group, except for attending physicians, and physicians who did not trust AI. This study suggests that at least 15% of physicians' differential diagnoses were affected by the differential diagnosis list in the AI-driven DDSS.

摘要

诊断决策支持系统(DDSS)有望减少诊断错误。然而,其对医生诊断决策的影响尚不清楚。我们的研究旨在评估在临床就诊前,根据患者输入的信息,通过人工智能驱动的 DDSS 生成鉴别诊断,然后评估 AI 诊断出的诊断在医生鉴别诊断中的出现频率。在这项随机对照研究中,进行了探索性分析。要求 22 名医生阅读 16 个临床病例摘要,每个病例生成不超过 3 个鉴别诊断。参与者分为两组,干预组和对照组,分别有无 AI 生成的鉴别诊断列表。干预组医生与 AI 鉴别诊断相同的诊断(主要结局)的出现频率明显高于对照组(70.2% vs. 55.1%,<0.001)。除了主治医生和不信任 AI 的医生,干预组的主要结局明显比对照组高 10%以上。本研究表明,至少有 15%的医生的鉴别诊断受到了 AI 驱动的 DDSS 中鉴别诊断列表的影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of a Differential Diagnosis List of Artificial Intelligence on Differential Diagnoses by Physicians: An Exploratory Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Study.人工智能鉴别诊断列表对医生鉴别诊断的影响:一项随机对照研究数据的探索性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115562.
2
Efficacy of Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Differential-Diagnosis List on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study.人工智能驱动的鉴别诊断清单对医生诊断准确性的影响:一项开放标签随机对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 21;18(4):2086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042086.
3
Effects of Combinational Use of Additional Differential Diagnostic Generators on the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Differential Diagnosis List Developed by an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Automated History-Taking System: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.额外鉴别诊断生成器联合使用对人工智能驱动的自动病史采集系统所制定的鉴别诊断列表诊断准确性的影响:前瞻性横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 2;7:e49034. doi: 10.2196/49034.
4
Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History-Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study.使用带有鉴别诊断生成器的自动病史采集系统的意外住院患者中诊断错误的发生率:回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e35225. doi: 10.2196/35225.
5
How does the artificial intelligence-based image-assisted technique help physicians in diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma? A randomized controlled experiment of multicenter physicians in China.基于人工智能的图像辅助技术如何帮助医生诊断肺腺癌?一项中国多中心医生的随机对照实验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2041-2049. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac179.
6
Trust in artificial intelligence for medical diagnoses.对人工智能在医学诊断中的信任。
Prog Brain Res. 2020;253:263-282. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Comparative Accuracy of Diagnosis by Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians vs Individual Physicians.多位医生集体智慧与单个医生诊断准确性的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0096.
8
Compliance with medical recommendations depending on the use of artificial intelligence as a diagnostic method.对医学建议的依从性取决于是否使用人工智能作为诊断方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01596-6.
9
ChatGPT-Generated Differential Diagnosis Lists for Complex Case-Derived Clinical Vignettes: Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation.基于复杂病例临床案例生成的ChatGPT鉴别诊断列表:诊断准确性评估。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Oct 9;11:e48808. doi: 10.2196/48808.
10
Can ChatGPT-4 evaluate whether a differential diagnosis list contains the correct diagnosis as accurately as a physician?ChatGPT-4能否像医生一样准确评估鉴别诊断列表是否包含正确的诊断?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 12;11(3):321-324. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0027. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating ChatGPT's moral competence in health care-related ethical problems.评估ChatGPT在医疗保健相关伦理问题中的道德能力。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 9;7(3):ooae065. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae065. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Leveraging Interpretable Feature Representations for Advanced Differential Diagnosis in Computational Medicine.利用可解释特征表示进行计算医学中的高级鉴别诊断。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 26;11(1):29. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010029.
3
Are artificial intelligence large language models a reliable tool for difficult differential diagnosis? An a posteriori analysis of a peculiar case of necrotizing otitis externa.人工智能大语言模型是进行疑难鉴别诊断的可靠工具吗?一例坏死性外耳道炎特殊病例的事后分析。
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Sep 19;11(9):e7933. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7933. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Effects of Combinational Use of Additional Differential Diagnostic Generators on the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Differential Diagnosis List Developed by an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Automated History-Taking System: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.额外鉴别诊断生成器联合使用对人工智能驱动的自动病史采集系统所制定的鉴别诊断列表诊断准确性的影响:前瞻性横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 2;7:e49034. doi: 10.2196/49034.
5
Influences of early diagnostic suggestions on clinical reasoning.早期诊断建议对临床推理的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Dec 15;7(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00453-y.
6
Electronic Diagnostic Support in Emergency Physician Triage: Qualitative Study With Thematic Analysis of Interviews.急诊医师分诊中的电子诊断支持:基于访谈主题分析的定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 30;9(3):e39234. doi: 10.2196/39234.
7
Future Research in General Medicine Has Diverse Topics and is Highly Promising: Opinions Based on a Questionnaire Survey.基于问卷调查的观点:普通医学的未来研究主题多样且前景广阔
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Aug 1;15:6381-6386. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369856. eCollection 2022.
8
Incidence of Diagnostic Errors Among Unexpectedly Hospitalized Patients Using an Automated Medical History-Taking System With a Differential Diagnosis Generator: Retrospective Observational Study.使用带有鉴别诊断生成器的自动病史采集系统的意外住院患者中诊断错误的发生率:回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e35225. doi: 10.2196/35225.
9
Human, All Too Human? An All-Around Appraisal of the "Artificial Intelligence Revolution" in Medical Imaging.《人,太有人性了?医学影像领域“人工智能革命”的全面评估》
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:710982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710982. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Next Generation of Medical Decision Support: A Roadmap Toward Transparent Expert Companions.下一代医学决策支持:通往透明专家助手的路线图。
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Sep 24;3:507973. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.507973. eCollection 2020.
2
Efficacy of Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Differential-Diagnosis List on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study.人工智能驱动的鉴别诊断清单对医生诊断准确性的影响:一项开放标签随机对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 21;18(4):2086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042086.
3
As if sand were stone. New concepts and metrics to probe the ground on which to build trustable AI.犹如沙砾成石。全新理念和度量衡,探索构建可信人工智能的基石。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01224-9.
4
Teaching heuristics and mnemonics to improve generation of differential diagnoses.教授启发式和记忆术以提高鉴别诊断的生成能力。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1742967. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1742967.
5
Differential Diagnosis Assessment in Ambulatory Care With an Automated Medical History-Taking Device: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.使用自动病史采集设备进行门诊护理的鉴别诊断评估:初步随机对照试验
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 4;7(4):e14044. doi: 10.2196/14044.
6
An open access medical knowledge base for community driven diagnostic decision support system development.一个开放获取的医学知识库,用于社区驱动的诊断决策支持系统的开发。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0804-1.
7
Diagnostic accuracy in Family Medicine residents using a clinical decision support system (DXplain): a randomized-controlled trial.使用临床决策支持系统(DXplain)对家庭医学住院医师进行诊断准确性评估:一项随机对照试验。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Jun 27;5(2):71-76. doi: 10.1515/dx-2017-0045.
8
Avoiding premature closure and reaching diagnostic accuracy: some key predictive factors.避免过早下结论和达到诊断准确性:一些关键的预测因素。
Med Educ. 2017 Nov;51(11):1127-1137. doi: 10.1111/medu.13382. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of GPs when using an early-intervention decision support system: a high-fidelity simulation.全科医生使用早期干预决策支持系统时的诊断准确性:一项高保真模拟研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Mar;67(656):e201-e208. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688417. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
The Role of Physicians' First Impressions in the Diagnosis of Possible Cancers without Alarm Symptoms.医生的第一印象在无警示症状的可能癌症诊断中的作用
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16644563. Epub 2016 Apr 25.