Heustess Ashli M, Allard Melissa A, Thompson Dorothea K, Fasinu Pius S
School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27501, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27501, USA.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 May 28;14(6):520. doi: 10.3390/ph14060520.
Since the outbreak and subsequent declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic in March 2020, concerted efforts have been applied by the scientific community to curtail the spread of the disease and find a cure. While vaccines constitute a vital part of the public health strategy to reduce the burden of COVID-19, the management of this disease will continue to rely heavily on pharmacotherapy. This study aims to provide an updated review of pharmacological agents that have been developed and/or repurposed for the treatment of COVID-19. To this end, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and LitCovid databases. Relevant clinical studies on drugs used in the management of COVID-19 were identified and evaluated in terms of evidence of efficacy and safety. To date, the FDA has approved three therapies for the treatment of COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization: convalescent plasma, remdesivir, and casirivimab/imdevimab (REGN-COV2). Drugs such as lopinavir/ritonavir, umifenovir, favipiravir, anakinra, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, interferons, tissue plasminogen activator, intravenous immunoglobulins, and nafamosat have been used off-label with mixed therapeutic results. Adjunctive administration of corticosteroids is also very common. The clinical experience with these approved and repurposed drugs is limited, and data on efficacy for the new indication are not strong. Overall, the response of the global scientific community to the COVID-19 pandemic has been impressive, as evident from the volume of scientific literature elucidating the molecular biology and pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 and the approval of three new drugs for clinical management. Reviewed studies have shown mixed data on efficacy and safety of the currently utilized drugs. The lack of standard treatment for COVID-19 has made it difficult to interpret results from most of the published studies due to the risk of attribution error. The long-term effects of drugs can only be assessed after several years of clinical experience; therefore, the efficacy and safety of current COVID-19 therapeutics should continue to be rigorously monitored as part of post-marketing studies.
自2020年3月新冠病毒爆发并随后被宣布为全球大流行以来,科学界齐心协力以遏制该疾病的传播并寻找治愈方法。虽然疫苗是减轻新冠负担的公共卫生策略的重要组成部分,但该疾病的管理仍将严重依赖药物治疗。本研究旨在对已开发和/或重新用于治疗新冠的药物制剂进行更新综述。为此,使用PubMed、谷歌学术和LitCovid数据库进行了全面的文献检索。确定了关于用于新冠管理的药物的相关临床研究,并根据疗效和安全性证据进行了评估。迄今为止,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已批准三种治疗新冠的紧急使用授权疗法:康复期血浆、瑞德西韦和卡西瑞韦/伊德维单抗(REGN-COV2)。洛匹那韦/利托那韦、乌米芬诺韦、法匹拉韦、阿那白滞素、氯喹、羟氯喹、托珠单抗、干扰素、组织纤溶酶原激活剂、静脉注射免疫球蛋白和那法莫司他等药物已被超说明书使用,治疗结果不一。辅助使用皮质类固醇也很常见。这些已批准和重新利用的药物的临床经验有限,关于新适应症疗效的数据也不充分。总体而言,全球科学界对新冠大流行的反应令人印象深刻,从阐明严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)分子生物学和病理生理学的科学文献数量以及三种新药获批用于临床管理中可见一斑。综述研究表明,目前使用的药物在疗效和安全性方面的数据不一。由于存在归因错误风险,缺乏新冠的标准治疗方法使得难以解读大多数已发表研究的结果。药物的长期影响只能在数年临床经验后进行评估;因此,作为上市后研究的一部分,应继续严格监测当前新冠治疗药物的疗效和安全性。