Lassan Stefan, Tesar Tomas, Tisonova Jana, Lassanova Monika
Department of Pneumology, Phthisiology and Functional Diagnostics, Slovak Medical University and Bratislava University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Department of Organisation and Management of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1143158. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1143158. eCollection 2023.
In the past few years, COVID-19 became the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the World Health Organization has declared an end to COVID-19 as a public health emergency, it can be expected, that the emerging new cases at the top of previous ones will result in an increasing number of patients with post-COVID-19 sequelae. Despite the fact that the majority of patients recover, severe acute lung tissue injury can in susceptible individuals progress to interstitial pulmonary involvement. Our goal is to provide an overview of various aspects associated with the Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with a focus on its potential pharmacological treatment options. We discuss epidemiology, underlying pathobiological mechanisms, and possible risk and predictive factors that were found to be associated with the development of fibrotic lung tissue remodelling. Several pharmacotherapeutic approaches are currently being applied and include anti-fibrotic drugs, prolonged use or pulses of systemic corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs. In addition, several repurposed or novel compounds are being investigated. Fortunately, clinical trials focused on pharmacological treatment regimens for post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis have been either designed, completed or are already in progress. However, the results are contrasting so far. High quality randomised clinical trials are urgently needed with respect to the heterogeneity of disease behaviour, patient characteristics and treatable traits. The Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis contributes to the burden of chronic respiratory consequences among survivors. Currently available pharmacotherapeutic approaches mostly comprise repurposed drugs with a proven efficacy and safety profile, namely, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and antifibrotics. The role of nintedanib and pirfenidone is promising in this area. However, we still need to verify conditions under which the potential to prevent, slow or stop progression of lung damage will be fulfilled.
在过去几年中,新冠病毒成为全球发病和死亡的主要原因。尽管世界卫生组织已宣布新冠疫情不再构成国际关注的突发公共卫生事件,但预计此前新增病例之上不断出现的新病例将导致新冠后遗症患者数量增加。尽管大多数患者康复,但在易感个体中,严重的急性肺组织损伤可能会发展为间质性肺受累。我们的目标是概述与新冠后肺纤维化相关的各个方面,重点关注其潜在的药物治疗选择。我们讨论了流行病学、潜在的病理生物学机制以及发现与肺组织纤维化重塑发展相关的可能风险和预测因素。目前正在应用几种药物治疗方法,包括抗纤维化药物、全身皮质类固醇的长期使用或脉冲给药以及非甾体抗炎和免疫抑制药物。此外,正在研究几种重新利用或新型化合物。幸运的是,针对新冠后肺纤维化药物治疗方案的临床试验已经设计、完成或正在进行中。然而,目前结果参差不齐。鉴于疾病行为、患者特征和可治疗特征的异质性,迫切需要高质量的随机临床试验。新冠后肺纤维化加重了幸存者慢性呼吸后果的负担。目前可用的药物治疗方法大多包括已证明具有疗效和安全性的重新利用药物,即皮质类固醇、免疫抑制剂和抗纤维化药物。尼达尼布和吡非尼酮在这一领域的作用很有前景。然而,我们仍需验证在何种条件下预防、减缓或阻止肺损伤进展的潜力才能实现。