Barden Craig, Stokes Keith A, McKay Carly D
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Rugby Football Union, Twickenham TW2 7BA, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115681.
The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) is a behaviour change model showing promise in positively changing youth sport coaches' injury prevention behaviours. This study incorporated the HAPA model into coach training workshops for , an efficacious rugby injury prevention programme. Primary aims were to investigate the effect of the workshop on schoolboy rugby union coaches' (1) perceptions towards injury risk and prevention, (2) adoption and adherence. Secondary aims were to (3) assess the differences in post-season HAPA constructs between workshop attendees and non-attendees, (4) explore associations between HAPA constructs and adherence. In the pre-season, all participants ( = 76) completed a baseline survey, with 41 coaches electing to attend a workshop. Participants completed a post-season survey assessing HAPA constructs and adoption and adherence throughout the season. The workshop did not affect coach perceptions of injury risk and prevention. Attendees had significantly greater rates of adoption (95% vs. 54% χ = 17.42, < 0.01) and adherence (median = 2 sessions vs. ≤1 session per week; z = 3.45, = 0.03) than non-attendees. At post-season, attendees had significantly greater task self-efficacy (z = -3.46, < 0.05) and intention (z = -4.33, < 0.05) to use . These results support the delivery of coach workshops that utilise a behaviour change model to maximise programme implementation.
健康行动过程方法(HAPA)是一种行为改变模型,在积极改变青少年体育教练的 injury prevention behaviours方面显示出前景。本研究将HAPA模型纳入了教练培训工作坊,这是一个有效的橄榄球 injury prevention programme。主要目的是调查该工作坊对男校橄榄球联盟教练的影响:(1)对 injury risk 和预防的认知;(2) adoption 和 adherence。次要目的是:(3)评估工作坊参与者和非参与者在赛季后的HAPA结构差异;(4)探索HAPA结构与 adherence之间的关联。在赛季前,所有参与者(n = 76)完成了基线调查,41名教练选择参加一个工作坊。参与者在赛季后完成了一项调查,评估HAPA结构以及整个赛季的 adoption 和 adherence。该工作坊并未影响教练对 injury risk 和预防的认知。与非参与者相比,参与者的 adoption 率(95%对54%;χ = 17.42,p < 0.01)和 adherence(中位数 = 每周2次训练对≤每周1次训练;z = 3.45,p = 0.03)显著更高。在赛季后,参与者使用的 task self-efficacy(z = -3.46,p < 0.05)和 intention(z = -4.33,p < 0.05)显著更高。这些结果支持开展利用行为改变模型的教练工作坊,以最大限度地提高项目实施效果。