Lindblom Hanna, Hägglund Martin
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Sport Without Injury ProgrammE (SWIPE), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Inj Prev. 2024 Jan 25;30(1):20-26. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-044978.
Adoption of injury prevention exercise programmes (IPEPs) in team sports is contingent on behaviour change among coaches. The aim was to study motivation and goal-pursuit in IPEP use among coaches of amateur football players.
A cross-sectional study using web-based questionnaires was administered to coaches in one Swedish regional football district. The study was carried out one season after dissemination of the IPEP . The questionnaire was based on the Health Action Process Approach and covered perceptions and beliefs about using . Questions were rated on 1-7 Likert scales.
440 coaches participated (response rate 32%). Coaches were neutral about injury risks (median 4-5) and knowledge about preventing injuries (median 5) but had positive outcome expectancies of preventive training (median 6). Coaches who had used an IPEP perceived they had more knowledge about preventing injuries than non-users (median 5 vs 4, small effect size =0.43). Coaches who used were positive about their practical ability to use it (median 6) and had high intention to prioritise continuous use (median 7). Highly adherent coaches to higher extent believed that specific training may prevent injuries and had plans for how to instruct the players and how to work around barriers compared with low adherent coaches.
Coaches need more knowledge and support on IPEP usage and how to structure training. Coaches who had adopted had high belief in their abilities but may need constructive plans on how to use the programme and to overcome barriers.
团队运动中采用 injury prevention exercise programmes(IPEPs,损伤预防锻炼计划)取决于教练的行为改变。目的是研究业余足球运动员教练在使用 IPEP 方面的动机和目标追求。
在瑞典一个地区足球区对教练进行了一项基于网络问卷的横断面研究。该研究在 IPEP 传播一个赛季后进行。问卷基于健康行动过程方法,涵盖了对使用的认知和信念。问题采用 1 - 7 李克特量表评分。
440 名教练参与(回复率 32%)。教练对损伤风险持中立态度(中位数 4 - 5),对预防损伤的知识水平一般(中位数 5),但对预防性训练有积极的结果预期(中位数 6)。使用过 IPEP 的教练认为他们比未使用者对预防损伤有更多的知识(中位数 5 对 4,小效应量 = 0.43)。使用过 IPEP 的教练对其实际使用能力持积极态度(中位数 6),并且有很高的意愿优先持续使用(中位数 7)。与低依从性教练相比,高依从性教练更相信特定训练可以预防损伤,并且有如何指导球员以及如何克服障碍的计划。
教练在 IPEP 使用以及如何组织训练方面需要更多的知识和支持。采用过 IPEP 的教练对自己的能力有很高的信心,但可能需要关于如何使用该计划以及如何克服障碍的建设性计划。