Suppr超能文献

评价全自动化学发光分析仪 Liaison XL 在结核病低发地区使用 QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus 检测试剂盒的性能。

Evaluation of the Fully Automated Chemiluminescence Analyzer Liaison XL for the Performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Assay in an Area with a Low Incidence of Tuberculosis.

机构信息

Microbiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, LHospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Biochemistry Department, Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos Evita de Lanús, Lanús, Argentina.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;59(8):e0060321. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00603-21.

Abstract

Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is considered key in the control of tuberculosis. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test (QFT-Plus), are now widely implemented for the diagnosis of LTBI. To date, the detection and quantification of IFN-γ has been mostly performed with semiautomated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), but several limitations currently exist. The study aims to evaluate the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzer Liaison XL compared to ELISA for the performance of the QFT-Plus test. Between February and April 2020, 333 heparin blood samples from 323 adult patients were collected at a tertiary teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Overall, the CLIA analyzer Liaison XL performed well for the detection of IFN-γ compared to the ELISA method, demonstrating substantial agreement (κ, 0.872) and great correlation between assays (r, >0.950). CLIA produced significantly higher values of IFN-γ IU per milliliter than the ELISA ( = 0.004 for the TB1 tube and  = 0.010 for the TB2 tube). Many discrepant cases (8/15, 53.3%) corresponded to indeterminate results with ELISA (NIL-corrected mitogen value of <0.5 IU/ml), which, when analyzed with the CLIA analyzer Liaison XL, reverted to interpretable results. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that CLIA presents a greater sensitivity for the identification of LTBI, especially among immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, the analytical variability reported between both ELISA and CLIA methods, especially around the standardized 0.35-IU/ml positivity threshold, suggests the need to refine the interpretative algorithm.

摘要

诊断潜伏性结核感染 (LTBI) 被认为是控制结核病的关键。干扰素γ (IFN-γ) 释放试验,如 QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus 试验 (QFT-Plus),现已广泛用于 LTBI 的诊断。迄今为止,IFN-γ 的检测和定量主要采用半自动酶联免疫吸附试验 (ELISA),但目前存在一些局限性。本研究旨在评估化学发光免疫分析仪 Liaison XL 与 ELISA 相比用于 QFT-Plus 试验的性能。2020 年 2 月至 4 月,在西班牙巴塞罗那的一家三级教学医院采集了 323 名成年患者的 333 份肝素血样。总体而言,与 ELISA 方法相比,CLIA 分析仪 Liaison XL 对 IFN-γ 的检测性能良好,显示出实质性的一致性 (κ,0.872) 和检测之间的高度相关性 (r,>0.950)。CLIA 产生的 IFN-γ IU/ml 比 ELISA 高(TB1 管为 0.004,TB2 管为 0.010)。许多不一致的情况(8/15,53.3%)对应于 ELISA 的不确定结果(校正非特异性刺激物值<0.5 IU/ml),当用 CLIA 分析仪 Liaison XL 分析时,结果重新变为可解释的结果。总之,该分析表明 CLIA 对 LTBI 的识别具有更高的敏感性,尤其是在免疫功能低下的患者中。此外,两种 ELISA 和 CLIA 方法之间报告的分析变异性,特别是在标准化 0.35 IU/ml 阳性阈值周围,表明需要细化解释算法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验