• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌药物治疗选择的药物经济学评价。

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmaceutical treatment options for prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital, University Medical Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;22(13):1685-1728. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1925647. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1080/14656566.2021.1925647
PMID:34076542
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is one of the most common neoplasms in men. For many years the mainstay of treatment was androgen deprivation therapy, but during last decade many novel agents have emerged, accompanied by increased costs for healthcare systems.

AREAS COVERED

In this literature review, the authors provide a pharmacoeconomic review of several pharmaceutical agents used in several disease stages, by summarizing evidence from cost-analysis, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-saving, cost-benefit and budgetary impact analysis studies.

EXPERT OPINION

The rapid development of therapeutic agents for prostate cancer has put a great budgetary burden on healthcare systems, since these drugs are prolonging survival and improving quality of life . Since existing data are now mature enough from a number of clinical trials with long-term follow-up, policy makers should propose not only the most clinically effective but also the most cost-effective agents, in order for every patient to gain access at least to some of these therapies. Docetaxel addition seems to be a cost-effective option, when compared to both abiraterone and enzalutamide (due to costs related to acquisition and side effects). Cabazitaxel is a strong candidate after docetaxel failure, while both denosumab and bisphosphonates are cost-effective for reducing skeletal-related events in metastatic disease.

摘要

简介

前列腺癌是男性最常见的肿瘤之一。多年来,雄激素剥夺疗法一直是治疗的主要手段,但在过去十年中,出现了许多新型药物,同时也增加了医疗保健系统的成本。

涵盖领域

在这篇文献综述中,作者通过总结成本分析、成本效益、成本效用、成本节约、成本效益和预算影响分析研究中的证据,对几种用于不同疾病阶段的药物进行了药物经济学评价。

专家意见

治疗前列腺癌的治疗药物的快速发展给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的预算负担,因为这些药物延长了生存时间并提高了生活质量。由于目前有许多具有长期随访的临床试验数据已经足够成熟,政策制定者不仅应该提出最具临床疗效的药物,还应该提出最具成本效益的药物,以便让每个患者至少能获得其中一些治疗方法。与阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺相比,多西他赛联合治疗似乎是一种具有成本效益的选择(由于与获得和副作用相关的成本)。在多西他赛治疗失败后,卡巴他赛是一种强有力的候选药物,而地舒单抗和双膦酸盐在治疗转移性疾病中的骨骼相关事件方面都具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmaceutical treatment options for prostate cancer.前列腺癌药物治疗选择的药物经济学评价。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;22(13):1685-1728. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1925647. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Treating Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Available Therapies.治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者:现有疗法的全面综述
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.106. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
3
Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study.卡巴他赛对比阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺治疗转移性前列腺癌患者的生活质量(CARD):一项随机、多中心、开放性、4 期研究的分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-1525. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30449-6. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
New therapeutic options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Can cost-effectiveness analysis help in treatment decisions?转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的新治疗选择:成本效益分析能否有助于治疗决策?
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):417-25. doi: 10.1177/1078155213509505. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
5
Cabazitaxel for Hormone-Relapsed Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.卡巴他赛用于先前接受含多西他赛方案治疗的激素难治性转移性前列腺癌:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估的证据审查小组观点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0457-1.
6
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第二部分:晚期、复发性和去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness model of abiraterone plus prednisone, cabazitaxel plus prednisone and enzalutamide for visceral metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer therapy after docetaxel therapy resistance.多西他赛耐药后的内脏转移去势抵抗性前列腺癌治疗中阿比特龙联合泼尼松、卡巴他赛联合泼尼松和恩扎卢胺的成本效果模型。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1202-1209. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1661581. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
Enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.恩杂鲁胺与醋酸阿比特龙治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性患者的比较。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;16(4):473-85. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.995090. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Cabazitaxel Remains Active in Patients Progressing After Docetaxel Followed by Novel Androgen Receptor Pathway Targeted Therapies.卡巴他赛在多西他赛后继以新型雄激素受体通路靶向治疗后进展的患者中仍然有效。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 2.
10
Update on Systemic Prostate Cancer Therapies: Management of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Precision Oncology.局部晚期和转移性前列腺癌的系统治疗进展:精准肿瘤学时代下转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的管理。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jan;75(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Literature Review on Economic Evaluations and Health Economic Models in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌的经济评估与健康经济模型的系统文献综述
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 22;32(8):412. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080412.
2
Amygdalin Exerts Antitumor Activity in Taxane-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells.苦杏仁苷对紫杉烷耐药前列腺癌细胞具有抗肿瘤活性。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;14(13):3111. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133111.
3
Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019.
2009 年至 2019 年期间,通过法国临时用药授权计划获得早期准入的固体肿瘤药物的生存、成本和附加治疗效益。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 15;151(8):1345-1354. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34129. Epub 2022 Jul 7.