• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009 年至 2019 年期间,通过法国临时用药授权计划获得早期准入的固体肿瘤药物的生存、成本和附加治疗效益。

Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019.

机构信息

Oncology Hematology and Cell Therapy Department, French National Agency for Safety of Medicines and Health Products ANSM, Saint-Denis, France.

Department of Pharmacy, Centre hospitalo-universitaire Hôpital Henri Mondor Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 15;151(8):1345-1354. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34129. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.34129
PMID:35603979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540593/
Abstract

Decisions on market authorization (MA) and reimbursement have different durations across countries because of health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and negotiations between manufacturers and national authorities. To overcome this delay, France has implemented a Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU) program that allows early access to drugs before MA, in order to treat patients with unmet medical needs. The objectives of our study were to establish the added therapeutic benefit (ATB) of ATUs for solid tumors and to investigate the correlations between three tools evaluating ATB and survival outcomes and drug costs. Data on ATUs granted from January 2009 to December 2019 to treat solid tumors were analyzed. An assessment of their ATB was conducted using the American Society of Clinical Oncology-Value Framework (ASCO-VF), the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and the French HTA criterion, clinical added value (CAV). The latter score determines reimbursement and national market access. Thirty-five drugs in 39 indications were granted ATUs. All of them obtained MA and derived a clinical benefit to be reimbursed by the Social Security. Twenty-eight (71.8%) had CAV compared to preexisting therapies. 24/38 (63.2%) had a 4-5 ESMO-MCBS score and 19/33 (57.6%) had an ASCO-VF score over 45. No correlations were found between cost, PFS, OS, CAV and ASCO-VF score, while high ESMO-MCBS scores were correlated to OS. In conclusion, many patients were treated with innovations before MA thanks to ATU, although there are discrepancies between ATB scales, hence the importance of international collaboration in the evaluation of innovative therapies.

摘要

药品的上市许可和报销决策在不同国家的持续时间有所不同,这是由于卫生技术评估(HTA)程序以及制造商与国家主管部门之间的谈判。为了克服这种延迟,法国实施了临时使用授权(ATU)计划,允许在上市许可之前提前获得药物,以治疗有未满足医疗需求的患者。我们的研究目的是确定 ATU 在实体瘤方面的附加治疗效益(ATB),并研究评估 ATB 的三种工具与生存结果和药物成本之间的相关性。分析了从 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月授予治疗实体瘤的 ATU 数据。使用美国临床肿瘤学会-价值框架(ASCO-VF)、欧洲肿瘤内科学会-临床获益幅度量表(ESMO-MCBS)和法国 HTA 标准,即临床附加价值(CAV)评估其 ATB。后者的评分决定了报销和国家市场准入。39 项适应证中的 35 种药物获得了 ATU。所有药物均获得上市许可,并具有临床获益,可由社会保险报销。与现有疗法相比,28 种(71.8%)药物具有 CAV。24/38(63.2%)种药物的 ESMO-MCBS 评分在 4-5 分之间,19/33(57.6%)种药物的 ASCO-VF 评分在 45 分以上。未发现成本、PFS、OS、CAV 和 ASCO-VF 评分之间存在相关性,而 ESMO-MCBS 评分较高与 OS 相关。总之,许多患者在获得上市许可之前就通过 ATU 接受了创新药物治疗,尽管 ATB 评分之间存在差异,因此评估创新疗法时国际合作非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/2afed105f0bd/IJC-151-1345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/552fc6ffe849/IJC-151-1345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/bcaea4a6a211/IJC-151-1345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/2afed105f0bd/IJC-151-1345-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/552fc6ffe849/IJC-151-1345-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/bcaea4a6a211/IJC-151-1345-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8d/9540593/2afed105f0bd/IJC-151-1345-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019.2009 年至 2019 年期间,通过法国临时用药授权计划获得早期准入的固体肿瘤药物的生存、成本和附加治疗效益。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 15;151(8):1345-1354. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34129. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis.美国和欧洲的癌症药物价格和临床获益:成本效益分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30139-X.
3
Examining the association between oncology drug clinical benefit and the time to public reimbursement.考察肿瘤药物临床获益与公共报销时间之间的关联。
Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(2):380-391. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4455. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Clinical benefit and cost of breakthrough cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品和药物管理局批准的突破性癌症药物的临床获益和成本。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;126(19):4390-4399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33095. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
Evaluation of changes in the clinical benefits of oncology drugs over time following reimbursement using the ASCO-VF and the ESMO-MCBS.使用美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架(ASCO-VF)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床效益量表(ESMO-MCBS)评估肿瘤药物报销后随时间推移临床效益的变化。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;150(3):113. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05587-0.
6
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010-2019.2010-2019 年在瑞士获批的癌症药物的临床获益。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0268545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268545. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale.采用 ASCO 价值框架和 ESMO 临床获益量表比较免疫检查点抑制剂与非免疫检查点抑制剂抗癌药物临床试验中的长期生存获益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803.
8
Temporary authorization for use: does the French patient access programme for unlicensed medicines impact market access after formal licensing?临时授权使用:法国未许可药品的患者准入计划对正式许可后的市场准入有何影响?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Apr;31(4):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0039-4.
9
Access to innovative medicines for metastatic melanoma worldwide: Melanoma World Society and European Association of Dermato-oncology survey in 34 countries.全球转移性黑色素瘤创新药物的可及性:34 个国家的黑色素瘤世界学会和欧洲皮肤病肿瘤学会调查。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
The ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for novel oncology drugs: correspondence with three years of reimbursement decisions in Israel.新型肿瘤药物的ESMO临床获益量表幅度:与以色列三年报销决策的对应关系。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Feb;18(1):119-122. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1343146. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and economic impact of the availability of innovative therapies for advanced lung cancer in men in Latin America: a population-based secondary data study.拉丁美洲男性晚期肺癌创新疗法可及性的临床和经济影响:一项基于人群的二次数据研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 2;49:101172. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101172. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Clinical relevance of reports on early access programs for checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a French retrospective nationwide cohort study.癌症患者检查点抑制剂早期准入计划报告的临床相关性:法国回顾性全国队列研究。
ESMO Open. 2024 Nov;9(11):103711. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103711. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Added therapeutic benefit regarding ESMO-MCBS and the French health technology assessment of drugs granted early access program.在欧洲肿瘤内科学会-综合获益量表(ESMO-MCBS)以及法国药品早期准入计划的卫生技术评估方面增加了治疗获益。
Ann Oncol. 2022 May;33(5):561-563. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
[Reform of early access to medicinal products in France].[法国药品早期获取途径的改革]
Bull Cancer. 2022 Jan;109(1):20-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.11.008. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmaceutical treatment options for prostate cancer.
Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price.
乳腺癌药物:FDA 批准、研发时间、疗效、临床获益、创新、临床试验、终点指标、生活质量、价值和价格。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1144-1155. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01634-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2024 May 21;11:115-123. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2024.2735. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Impact of Early Access Reform on Oncology Innovation in France: Approvals, Patients, and Costs.早期准入改革对法国肿瘤学创新的影响:批准、患者和成本。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):465-475. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00658-1. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
Impact of Systemic Delays for Patient Access to Oncology Drugs on Clinical, Economic, and Quality of Life Outcomes in Canada: A Call to Action.加拿大肿瘤药物患者获得途径的系统延迟对临床、经济和生活质量结果的影响:行动呼吁。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Mar 11;31(3):1460-1469. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31030110.
7
A cross-sectional analysis of treatment patterns in small-cell lung cancer in five European countries.五项欧洲国家小细胞肺癌治疗模式的横断面分析。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(17):1151-1164. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-1315. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Measuring Safety and Outcomes for the Use of Compassionate and Off-Label Therapies for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer in the SACHA-France Study.在 SACHA-France 研究中,衡量对患有癌症的儿童、青少年和年轻成人使用同情用药和超适应证治疗的安全性和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21568.
9
Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments.肿瘤学试验设计的意义以及疗效-安全性数据的不确定性对卫生技术评估的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;29(8):5774-5791. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080455.
前列腺癌药物治疗选择的药物经济学评价。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Sep;22(13):1685-1728. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1925647. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years.13年间美国食品药品监督管理局、欧洲药品管理局及法国临时使用授权程序的抗癌药物获取时间对比研究
Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;149:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Access to innovation through the national early access program and clinical trials for patients with malignant melanoma.通过国家早期准入计划和临床试验为恶性黑色素瘤患者获取创新药物。
Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;127(13):2262-2270. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33492. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
The use of 'added benefit' to determine the price of new anti-cancer drugs in France, 2004-2017.2004-2017 年法国用“附加获益”来确定新抗癌药物的价格。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.031. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Appraisal of cancer drugs: a comparison of the French health technology assessment with value frameworks of two oncology societies.癌症药物评估:法国卫生技术评估与两个肿瘤学会价值框架的比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug;20(4):405-409. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1635458. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
8
Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score.使用 ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale 版本 1.1 和 ASCO 价值框架净健康获益评分对临床获益进行比较评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00729. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
9
Financial Toxicity in Adults With Cancer: Adverse Outcomes and Noncompliance.成年癌症患者的经济毒性:不良后果与不依从性
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Oct 24:JOP1800120. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00120.
10
Reconciling States' "Right to Try" Legislation and FDA's Expanded Access Program: Legal Issues.协调各州的“试验权”立法与美国食品药品监督管理局的扩大使用计划:法律问题。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar;51(2):153-156. doi: 10.1177/2168479016683217. Epub 2017 Jan 5.