Suppr超能文献

癌症后补充医学的自付费用及全民医保背景下的经济影响:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果

Out-of-Pocket Costs of Complementary Medicine Following Cancer and the Financial Impact in a Setting With Universal Health Coverage: Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Bhoo-Pathy Nirmala, Subramaniam Shridevi, Khalil Sadia, Kimman Merel, Kong Yek-Ching, Ng Chiu-Wan, Bustamam Ros Suzanna, Yip Cheng-Har

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Centre of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1592-e1602. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01052. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine household spending patterns on complementary medicine following cancer and the financial impact in a setting with universal health coverage.

METHODS

Country-specific data from a multinational prospective cohort study, Association of Southeast Asian Nations Costs in Oncology Study, comprising 1,249 cancer survivors were included. Household costs of complementary medicine (healthcare practices or products that are not considered as part of conventional medicine) throughout the first year after cancer diagnosis were measured using cost diaries. Study outcomes comprised (1) shares of household expenditures on complementary medicine from total out-of-pocket costs and health costs that were respectively incurred in relation to cancer, (2) incidence of financial catastrophe (out-of-pocket costs related to cancer ≥ 30% of annual household income), and (3) economic hardship (inability to pay for essential household items or services).

RESULTS

One third of patients reported out-of-pocket household expenditures on complementary medicine in the immediate year after cancer diagnosis, accounting to 20% of the total out-of-pocket costs and 35% of the health costs. Risk of financial catastrophe was higher in households reporting out-of-pocket expenditures on complementary medicine (adjusted odds ratio: 1.39 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.86]). Corresponding odds ratio within patients from low-income households showed that they were substantially more vulnerable: 2.28 (95% CI, 1.41 to 3.68). Expenditures on complementary medicine were, however, not associated with economic hardship in the immediate year after cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In settings with universal health coverage, integration of subsidized evidence-based complementary medicine into mainstream cancer care may alleviate catastrophic expenditures. However, this must go hand in hand with interventions to reduce the use of nonevidence-based complementary therapies following cancer.

摘要

目的

确定癌症患者家庭在补充医学方面的支出模式以及全民健康覆盖背景下的经济影响。

方法

纳入了一项多国前瞻性队列研究——东南亚国家肿瘤成本研究的特定国家数据,该研究包含1249名癌症幸存者。使用成本日记记录癌症诊断后第一年补充医学(不被视为传统医学一部分的医疗实践或产品)的家庭成本。研究结果包括:(1)补充医学家庭支出占与癌症相关的自付费用和医疗费用总额的比例;(2)财务危机发生率(与癌症相关的自付费用≥家庭年收入的30%);(3)经济困难(无力支付基本家庭用品或服务费用)。

结果

三分之一的患者报告在癌症诊断后的次年有补充医学的自付家庭支出,占自付费用总额的20%,医疗费用的35%。报告有补充医学自付支出的家庭发生财务危机的风险更高(调整后的优势比:1.39[95%CI,1.05至1.86])。低收入家庭患者的相应优势比表明他们更易受影响:2.28(95%CI,1.41至3.68)。然而,癌症诊断后的次年,补充医学支出与经济困难无关。

结论

在全民健康覆盖的背景下,将有补贴的循证补充医学纳入主流癌症护理可能会减轻灾难性支出。然而,这必须与减少癌症后使用非循证补充疗法的干预措施同时进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验