Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;11(1):15. doi: 10.3390/medsci11010015.
Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.
大多数接受某些化疗的癌症患者都会患有 CIPN。因此,患者和医务人员都非常关注非药物的补充疗法,但 CIPN 背景下的循证医学证据尚未明确指出。本研究对已发表的关于应用补充疗法改善复杂 CIPN 症状的临床证据进行了范围综述,并结合专家共识过程的建议进行了综合,旨在引起对 CIPN 支持性策略的关注。该范围综述于 2020 年在 PROSPERO 上进行了注册(CRD42020165851),并遵循了 PRISMA-ScR 和 JBI 指南。纳入了 2000 年至 2021 年期间在 Pubmed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PEDro、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 CINAHL 上发表的相关研究。使用 CASP 评估了研究的方法学质量。符合纳入标准的 75 项研究质量参差不齐。推拿疗法(包括按摩、反射疗法、治疗触摸)、节律性搽剂、运动和身心疗法、针灸/按摩、TENS/ scrambler 疗法是研究中最常分析的疗法,可能是 CIPN 的有效治疗选择。专家组批准了 17 种支持性干预措施,其中大多数为植物疗法干预措施,包括外部应用和冷冻疗法、水疗和触觉刺激。在治疗应用中,超过三分之二的经同意的干预措施被认为具有中等至高度的临床有效性。本综述和专家小组的证据均支持针对 CIPN 的支持性治疗的各种补充方法;然而,在每个病例中,都应根据患者的情况来权衡应用这些方法的利弊。基于本次综合研究,跨专业的医疗团队可以与对非药物治疗选择感兴趣的患者展开对话,根据他们的需求提供补充咨询和治疗。