Suppr超能文献

探究针对抑郁症的接纳与承诺疗法(SET)与情绪聚焦疗法(EFT)中特定患者的改变机制:一项机制性随机对照试验的研究方案

Investigating patient-specific mechanisms of change in SET vs. EFT for depression: study protocol for a mechanistic randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zilcha-Mano Sigal, Shahar Ben, Fisher Hadar, Dolev-Amit Tohar, Greenberg Leslie S, Barber Jacques P

机构信息

The Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.

The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03279-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and one of the most heterogeneous mental health disorders. Although there are effective treatments for MDD, about 50% of patients do not respond to treatment. One of the greatest challenges in improving current treatments is identifying the mechanisms responsible for therapeutic change in MDD. The proposed study aims to identify patient-specific mechanisms of change in two treatments for MDD by investigating whether subpopulations of patients differ in the mechanisms of change that operate when receiving a given treatment. Based on theories of targeting weakness and building on strength, we will examine whether the mechanism of change operating when a treatment is provided depends on whether the treatment targets the patient's strength or weakness.

METHOD

To test our hypothesis that two treatments, supportive-expressive treatment (SET) and emotion-focused treatment (EFT), differ in their mechanisms of change and to explore whether focusing on the patient's strength or weakness will result in better treatment outcome, we conduct a mechanistic randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty-four individuals diagnosed with MDD are randomized to 16 sessions of either SET or EFT. The two treatments are theorized to differ in their main mechanism of change: SET places emphasis on insight as its main mechanism of change, and EFT places emphasis on emotional processing. Both can serve as strength- or weakness-focused treatments, based on the patient's baseline levels of insight and emotional processing. The primary outcome is the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Additional measures include self-report measures and clinical interviews, hormonal, motion, acoustic, physiological, and neuroimaging assessments, performance on cognitive tasks, and narrative material (collected from the sessions and interviews).

DISCUSSION

The RCT will expand our understanding of mechanisms of change in psychotherapy, from one-size-fits-all to patient-specific mechanisms of change. By informing therapists about which of the two approaches is most effective with patients based on their baseline characteristics, the RCT will contribute to progress toward personalized treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04576182 submitted on October 1st 2020.

FUNDING

The Israel Science Foundation. Trial status: Recruitment is ongoing.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球致残的主要原因,也是最具异质性的精神健康障碍之一。尽管有针对MDD的有效治疗方法,但约50%的患者对治疗无反应。改善当前治疗方法面临的最大挑战之一是确定导致MDD治疗变化的机制。拟开展的研究旨在通过调查接受特定治疗时患者亚群在变化机制上是否存在差异,来确定两种MDD治疗方法中患者特异性的变化机制。基于靶向弱点和发挥优势的理论,我们将研究提供治疗时起作用的变化机制是否取决于该治疗针对的是患者的优势还是弱点。

方法

为检验我们的假设,即两种治疗方法,支持性表达治疗(SET)和情绪聚焦治疗(EFT),在变化机制上存在差异,并探索关注患者的优势或弱点是否会带来更好的治疗效果,我们开展了一项机制性随机对照试验。124名被诊断为MDD的个体被随机分配接受16次SET或EFT治疗。理论上,这两种治疗方法在主要变化机制上存在差异:SET将洞察力作为其主要变化机制,而EFT则强调情绪处理。根据患者洞察力和情绪处理的基线水平,两者都可作为关注优势或弱点的治疗方法。主要结局指标是汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表。其他测量指标包括自我报告测量、临床访谈、激素、运动、声学、生理和神经影像学评估、认知任务表现以及叙事材料(从治疗过程和访谈中收集)。

讨论

该随机对照试验将扩展我们对心理治疗变化机制的理解,从一刀切的方法转变为患者特异性的变化机制。通过告知治疗师基于患者基线特征哪种方法对患者最有效,该随机对照试验将有助于推动个性化治疗的进展。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT04576182,于2020年10月1日提交。

资金来源

以色列科学基金会。试验状态:正在招募。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3f/8173838/a2d91757ad03/12888_2021_3279_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验