Suppr超能文献

社区心理健康环境中认知疗法与动力心理疗法治疗重度抑郁症的比较效果:一项随机临床非劣效性试验

Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive Therapy and Dynamic Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in a Community Mental Health Setting: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.

作者信息

Connolly Gibbons Mary Beth, Gallop Robert, Thompson Donald, Luther Debra, Crits-Christoph Katherine, Jacobs Julie, Yin Seohyun, Crits-Christoph Paul

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

NHS Human Services, Erdenheim, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):904-11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1720.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Dynamic psychotherapy (DT) is widely practiced in the community, but few trials have established its effectiveness for specific mental health disorders relative to control conditions or other evidence-based psychotherapies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether DT is not inferior to cognitive therapy (CT) in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in a community mental health setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From October 28, 2010, to July 2, 2014, outpatients with MDD were randomized to treatment delivered by trained therapists. Twenty therapists employed at a community mental health center in Pennsylvania were trained by experts in CT or DT. A total of 237 adult outpatients with MDD seeking services at this site were randomized to 16 sessions of DT or CT delivered across 5 months. Final assessment was completed on December 9, 2014, and data were analyzed from December 10, 2014, to January 14, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Short-term DT or CT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Expert blind evaluations with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

RESULTS

Among the 237 patients (59 men [24.9%]; 178 women [75.1%]; mean [SD] age, 36.2 [12.1] years) treated by 20 therapists (19 women and 1 man; mean [SD] age, 40.0 [14.6] years), 118 were randomized to DT and 119 to CT. A mean (SD) difference between treatments was found in the change on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression of 0.86 (7.73) scale points (95% CI, -0.70 to 2.42; Cohen d, 0.11), indicating that DT was statistically not inferior to CT. A statistically significant main effect was found for time (F1,198 = 75.92; P = .001). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments on patient ratings of treatment credibility. Dynamic psychotherapy and CT were discriminated from each other on competence in supportive techniques (t120 = 2.48; P = .02), competence in expressive techniques (t120 = 4.78; P = .001), adherence to CT techniques (t115 = -7.07; P = .001), and competence in CT (t115 = -7.07; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that DT is not inferior to CT on change in depression for the treatment of MDD in a community mental health setting. The 95% CI suggests that the effects of DT are equivalent to those of CT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01207271.

摘要

重要性

动力心理治疗(DT)在社区中广泛应用,但相对于对照条件或其他循证心理治疗,很少有试验证实其对特定心理健康障碍的有效性。

目的

在社区心理健康环境中,确定动力心理治疗在治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)方面是否不劣于认知疗法(CT)。

设计、地点和参与者:从2010年10月28日至2014年7月2日,将患有重度抑郁症的门诊患者随机分配给经过培训的治疗师进行治疗。宾夕法尼亚州一家社区心理健康中心的20名治疗师接受了认知疗法或动力心理治疗专家的培训。共有237名在此处寻求服务的成年重度抑郁症门诊患者被随机分配接受为期5个月的16节动力心理治疗或认知疗法。最终评估于2014年12月9日完成,数据于2014年12月10日至2016年1月14日进行分析。

干预措施

短期动力心理治疗或认知疗法。

主要结局和测量指标

采用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表进行专家盲法评估。

结果

在由20名治疗师(19名女性和1名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,40.0[14.6]岁)治疗的237名患者(59名男性[24.9%];178名女性[75.1%];平均[标准差]年龄,36.2[12.1]岁)中,118名被随机分配接受动力心理治疗,119名接受认知疗法。汉密尔顿抑郁量表变化的治疗间平均(标准差)差异为0.86(7.73)个量表分(95%CI,-0.70至2.42;Cohen d,0.11),表明动力心理治疗在统计学上不劣于认知疗法。发现时间有统计学显著的主效应(F1,198 = 75.92;P = 0.001)。在患者对治疗可信度的评分上,治疗间未发现统计学显著差异。动力心理治疗和认知疗法在支持性技术能力(t120 = 2.48;P = 0.02)、表达性技术能力(t120 = 4.78;P = 0.001)、对认知疗法技术的依从性(t115 = -7.07;P = 0.001)以及认知疗法能力(t115 = -7.07;P = 0.001)方面相互有差异。

结论及相关性

本研究表明,在社区心理健康环境中治疗重度抑郁症时,动力心理治疗在抑郁变化方面不劣于认知疗法。95%CI表明动力心理治疗的效果与认知疗法相当。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01207271。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders.常见精神障碍的短期心理动力心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 1;2014(7):CD004687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验