• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Structured Professional Judgment to Assist the Evaluation and Safety Planning of Suicide Risk: The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP).协助自杀风险评估与安全规划的结构化专业判断:自杀风险协议(RoSP)
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 17;12:607120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.607120. eCollection 2021.
2
Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.住院患者暴力和自伤的易感性(风险和保护)因素:前瞻性研究结构化专业判断工具 START 和 SAPROF、DUNDRUM-3 和 DUNDRUM-4 在法医精神卫生服务中的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 27;13:197. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-197.
3
The Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Manual (S-RAMM) Validation Study II.《自杀风险评估与管理手册》(S-RAMM)验证研究二
Ir J Psychol Med. 2009 Sep;26(3):107-113. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700000380.
4
Clinicians' use of the structured professional judgement approach for adult secure psychiatric service admission assessments: A systematic review.临床医生在成人精神科安保服务入院评估中使用结构化专业判断方法:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0308598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308598. eCollection 2024.
5
Risk of dying unnaturally among people aged 15-35 years who have harmed themselves and inflicted violence on others: a national nested case-control study.15-35 岁自残又伤害他人人群的非自然死亡风险:一项全国嵌套病例对照研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 May;4(5):e220-e228. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30042-8.
6
Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.法医精神病患者暴力风险评估模型的评估
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Oct;54(10):1372-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1372.
7
Determinants and Predictive Value of Clinician Assessment of Short-Term Suicide Risk.临床医生评估短期自杀风险的决定因素及其预测价值。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Apr;49(2):614-626. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12462. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.了解临床医生在评估未来暴力风险时对线索的运用:精神科环境中的临床判断分析
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):125-41. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1941. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme.短期风险与可治疗性评估(START):一种新型结构化专业判断方案的依据
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(6):747-66. doi: 10.1002/bsl.737.
10
Recurrence and mortality 1 year after hospital admission for non-fatal self-harm: a nationwide population-based study.非致命性自伤后住院 1 年内的复发和死亡率:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Feb 18;29:e20. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000039.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of generative AI-large language models' recognition of veteran suicide risk: a comparison with human mental health providers using a risk stratification model.生成式人工智能大语言模型识别退伍军人自杀风险的有效性:与使用风险分层模型的人类心理健康提供者的比较。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 3;16:1544951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544951. eCollection 2025.
2
The Cardiff Self-Injury Inventory (English version): Convergent validity and psychometric properties.《加的夫自我伤害量表(英文版):收敛效度与心理测量特性》
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 31;6(1):e1028. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1028. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Long-Term Use and Application of Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) Protocol Following Original Training.长期使用和应用系统性量身定制的自杀应对评估(STARS)方案,在原始培训之后。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811324.

本文引用的文献

1
The Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Manual (S-RAMM) Validation Study II.《自杀风险评估与管理手册》(S-RAMM)验证研究二
Ir J Psychol Med. 2009 Sep;26(3):107-113. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700000380.
2
The Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Manual (S-RAMM) Validation Study 1.《自杀风险评估与管理手册》(S-RAMM)验证研究1
Ir J Psychol Med. 2009 Jun;26(2):54-58. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700000215.
3
Accuracy of risk scales for predicting repeat self-harm and suicide: a multicentre, population-level cohort study using routine clinical data.风险量表预测重复自伤和自杀的准确性:一项使用常规临床数据的多中心、人群水平队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 25;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1693-z.
4
Can we usefully stratify patients according to suicide risk?我们能否根据自杀风险对患者进行有效分层?
BMJ. 2017 Oct 17;359:j4627. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4627.
5
Predictive accuracy of risk scales following self-harm: multicentre, prospective cohort study.自伤后风险量表的预测准确性:多中心前瞻性队列研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;210(6):429-436. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.189993. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Predicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales.使用临床工具预测自杀行为:风险量表阳性预测值的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;210(6):387-395. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.182717. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Predicting suicides after psychiatric hospitalization in US Army soldiers: the Army Study To Assess Risk and rEsilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).预测美国陆军士兵精神病院出院后的自杀率:军人研究评估风险和服役人员弹性(军人 STARRS)。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):49-57. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1754.
8
Longitudinal HCR-20 scores in a high-secure psychiatric hospital.一家高度戒备精神病院内的HCR-20纵向评分
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Jul;24(3):169-80. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1893. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
9
Non-suicidal self-injury v. attempted suicide: new diagnosis or false dichotomy?非自杀性自伤行为与自杀未遂:新诊断还是错误二分法?
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 May;202(5):326-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116111.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical factors associated with the suicide of psychiatric in-patients.系统回顾和荟萃分析与精神科住院患者自杀相关的临床因素。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 Jul;124(1):18-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01672.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

协助自杀风险评估与安全规划的结构化专业判断:自杀风险协议(RoSP)

Structured Professional Judgment to Assist the Evaluation and Safety Planning of Suicide Risk: The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP).

作者信息

Gray Nicola S, John Ann, McKinnon Aimee, Raybould Stephanie, Knowles James, Snowden Robert J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 17;12:607120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.607120. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.607120
PMID:34079476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165193/
Abstract

The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP) is a structured professional judgment (SPJ) scheme designed in line with NICE guidelines to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and manage suicide risk. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RoSP in two settings: (1) unexpected deaths of people in the community who were known to mental health services; and (2) an inpatient hospital specializing in the assessment and treatment of patients with personality disorder. In Study 1, information from a database of unexpected deaths ( = 68) within an NHS health board was used to complete a RoSP assessment (blind to cause of death) and information from the Coroner's Court was used to assign people to suicide vs. natural causes/accidental death. In Study 2, patients ( = 62) were assessed on the RoSP upon admission to hospital and their self-injurious behaviors were recorded over the first 3 months of admission. (1) Evaluations using RoSP were highly reliable in both samples (ICCs 0.93-0.98); (2) professional judgment based on the RoSP was predictive of completed suicide in the community sample (AUC = 0.83) and; (3) was predictive of both suicide attempts (AUC = 0.81) and all self-injurious behaviors (AUC = 0.80) for the inpatient sample. RoSP is a reliable and valid instrument for the structured clinical evaluation of suicide risk for use in inpatient psychiatric services and in community mental health services. RoSP's efficacy is comparable to well-established structured professional judgment instruments designed to predict other risk behavior (e.g., HCR-20 and the prediction of violence). The use of RoSP for the clinical evaluation of suicide risk and safety-planning provides a structure for meeting NICE guidelines for suicide prevention and is now evidence-based.

摘要

自杀风险协议(RoSP)是一种结构化专业判断(SPJ)方案,其设计符合英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的指南,旨在提高临床医生评估和管理自杀风险的能力。本研究旨在评估RoSP在两种情况下的有效性:(1)心理健康服务机构已知的社区居民意外死亡情况;(2)一家专门评估和治疗人格障碍患者的住院医院。在研究1中,利用国民保健服务(NHS)健康委员会内一个意外死亡数据库(n = 68)的信息完成RoSP评估(对死亡原因不知情),并利用死因裁判法庭的信息将人员归类为自杀死亡与自然原因/意外死亡。在研究2中,患者(n = 62)在入院时接受RoSP评估,并在入院后的前3个月记录其自伤行为。(1)在两个样本中,使用RoSP进行的评估都具有高度可靠性(组内相关系数ICC为0.93 - 0.98);(2)基于RoSP的专业判断能够预测社区样本中的自杀完成情况(曲线下面积AUC = 0.83),并且;(3)能够预测住院样本中的自杀未遂情况(AUC = 0.81)和所有自伤行为(AUC = 0.80)。RoSP是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于住院精神科服务和社区心理健康服务中对自杀风险进行结构化临床评估。RoSP的有效性与旨在预测其他风险行为(例如,HCR - 20及暴力预测)的成熟结构化专业判断工具相当。使用RoSP进行自杀风险临床评估和安全规划为符合NICE自杀预防指南提供了一种架构,并且现在有了循证依据。