Suppr超能文献

中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣钙化评分的诊断及预后准确性

Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Boulif Jamila, Slimani Alisson, Lazam Siham, de Meester Christophe, Piérard Sophie, Pasquet Agnès, Pouleur Anne-Catherine, Vancraeynest David, El Khoury Gébrine, de Kerchove Laurent, Gerber Bernhard L, Vanoverschelde Jean-Louis

机构信息

Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 17;8:673519. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.673519. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Assessing the true severity of aortic stenosis (AS) remains a challenge, particularly when echocardiography yields discordant results. Recent European and American guidelines recommend measuring aortic valve calcium (AVC) by multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) to improve this assessment. To define, using a standardized MDCT scanning protocol, the optimal AVC load criteria for truly severe AS in patients with concordant echocardiographic findings, to establish the ability of these criteria to predict clinical outcomes, and to investigate their ability to delineate truly severe AS in patients with discordant echocardiographic AS grading. Two hundred and sixty-six patients with moderate-to-severe AS and normal LVEF prospectively underwent MDCT and Doppler-echocardiography to assess AS severity. In patients with concordant AS grading, ROC analysis identified optimal cut-off values for diagnosing severe AS using different AVC load criteria. In these patients, 4-year event-free survival was better with low AVC load (60-63%) by these criteria than with high AVC load (23-26%, log rank < 0.001). Patients with discordant AS grading had higher AVC load than those with moderate AS but lower AVC load than those with severe high-gradient AS. Between 36 and 55% of patients with severe LG-AS met AVC load criteria for severe AS. Although AVC load predicted outcome in these patients as well, its prognostic impact was less than in patients with concordant AS grading. Assessment of AVC load accurately identifies truly severe AS and provides powerful prognostic information. Our data further indicate that patients with discordant AS grading consist in a heterogenous group, as evidenced by their large range of AVC load. MDCT allows to differentiate between truly severe and pseudo-severe AS in this population as well, although the prognostic implications thereof are less pronounced than in patients with concordant AS grading.

摘要

评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的真正严重程度仍然是一项挑战,尤其是当超声心动图结果不一致时。最近的欧美指南建议通过多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)测量主动脉瓣钙化(AVC),以改善这种评估。使用标准化的MDCT扫描协议,确定超声心动图结果一致的患者中真正严重AS的最佳AVC负荷标准,确定这些标准预测临床结果的能力,并研究其在超声心动图AS分级不一致的患者中区分真正严重AS的能力。266例中度至重度AS且左心室射血分数(LVEF)正常的患者前瞻性地接受了MDCT和多普勒超声心动图检查,以评估AS严重程度。在AS分级一致的患者中,ROC分析确定了使用不同AVC负荷标准诊断严重AS的最佳临界值。在这些患者中,按照这些标准,低AVC负荷组(60 - 63%)的4年无事件生存率优于高AVC负荷组(23 - 26%,对数秩检验<0.001)。AS分级不一致的患者的AVC负荷高于中度AS患者,但低于严重高梯度AS患者。36%至55%的严重低梯度AS患者符合严重AS的AVC负荷标准。尽管AVC负荷在这些患者中也能预测预后,但其预后影响小于AS分级一致的患者。AVC负荷评估能准确识别真正严重的AS,并提供有力的预后信息。我们的数据进一步表明,AS分级不一致的患者构成一个异质性群体,这从他们广泛的AVC负荷范围可以看出。MDCT也能够在这一人群中区分真正严重的AS和假性严重AS,尽管其预后意义不如AS分级一致的患者明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518c/8165166/5cfd1241aa72/fcvm-08-673519-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验