Suppr超能文献

使用花粉标记变应原和花粉泛变应原进行分子过敏诊断:在对花粉提取物的多次检测反应中观察到的五种模式。

Molecular allergy diagnosis using pollen marker allergens and pollen panallergens: Five patterns seen in multiple test reactions to pollen extracts.

作者信息

Kleine-Tebbe Jörg, Ackermann-Simon Juliane, Hanf Gerald

机构信息

Allergy and Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient Clinic & Research Center Hanf, Ackermann and Kleine-Tebbe, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Allergol Select. 2021 May 27;5:180-186. doi: 10.5414/ALX02238E. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Polysensitizations to tree, grass, and weed pollen are found in ~ 20% of pollen-allergic individuals. They are often based on broad IgE cross-reactivities to pollen panallergens belonging to highly conserved protein families: 1. profilins, 2. polcalcins (calcium-binding proteins in pollen), 3. cyclophilins. They represent highly conserved cross-reactive minor allergens present in all pollen species, but also in plant foods and other organisms. Despite being rarely clinically relevant they can hamper allergy diagnostic tests with extracts. In this situation, molecular allergy diagnosis is able to distinguish broad cross-reactivity due to allergen-specific IgE to pollen panallergens (i.e. profilins Bet v 2 or Phl p 12; polcalcins Bet v 4 or Phl p 7; and, in the future, cyclophilins Bet v 7 or Ole e 15) from primary IgE sensitizations to so-called marker allergens represented by important pollen major allergens: Bet v 1 for the birch and beech family (), Ole e 1 for olive and ash (), Phl p 1 for temperate climate grasses (), Art v 1 for mugwort (), Amb a 1 for Ambrosia species (). Five typical cases (A - E) with positive skin prick test results to tree, grass, and weed pollen extracts demonstrate typical patterns of IgE sensitization with a variable impact of pollen panallergens: A - profilins, B - polcalcins, C - profilins and polcalcins, D - presumably cyclophilins, E - primary polysensitization to tree, grass, and weed pollen without interference from profilins or polcalcins. Differences between pollen extract-based skin prick test diagnosis and molecular allergen-specific IgE testing are explained using the presented concept. This approach allows to reduce the number of allergen extracts - presuming they are also clinically relevant - for allergen immunotherapy (i.e., only tree and/or grass pollen extracts), particularly in pollen-polysensitized patients.

摘要

在约20%的花粉过敏个体中发现对树、草和杂草花粉的多重致敏。它们通常基于对属于高度保守蛋白家族的花粉泛过敏原的广泛IgE交叉反应性:1. 肌动蛋白结合蛋白;2. 花粉钙结合蛋白(花粉中的钙结合蛋白);3. 亲环素。它们代表了所有花粉物种中存在的高度保守的交叉反应性次要过敏原,也存在于植物性食物和其他生物体中。尽管它们在临床上很少具有相关性,但它们会干扰提取物的过敏诊断测试。在这种情况下,分子过敏诊断能够区分由于对花粉泛过敏原(即肌动蛋白结合蛋白Bet v 2或Phl p 12;花粉钙结合蛋白Bet v 4或Phl p 7;以及未来的亲环素Bet v 7或Ole e 15)的过敏原特异性IgE导致的广泛交叉反应性与对由重要花粉主要过敏原代表的所谓标记过敏原的原发性IgE致敏:桦木和山毛榉科的Bet v 1()、橄榄和白蜡树的Ole e 1()、温带气候草的Phl p 1()、艾蒿的Art v 1()、豚草属的Amb a 1()。五例(A - E)对树、草和杂草花粉提取物皮肤点刺试验结果呈阳性的典型病例展示了IgE致敏的典型模式,花粉泛过敏原的影响各不相同:A - 肌动蛋白结合蛋白,B - 花粉钙结合蛋白,C - 肌动蛋白结合蛋白和花粉钙结合蛋白,D - 可能是亲环素,E - 对树、草和杂草花粉的原发性多重致敏,不受肌动蛋白结合蛋白或花粉钙结合蛋白的干扰。使用所提出的概念解释了基于花粉提取物的皮肤点刺试验诊断与分子过敏原特异性IgE检测之间的差异。这种方法可以减少过敏原提取物的数量——假设它们在临床上也具有相关性——用于过敏原免疫治疗(即,仅使用树和/或草花粉提取物),特别是在花粉多重致敏患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b03d/8167734/a18f71183f1b/allergologieselect-5-180-01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验