Suppr超能文献

社区居住的虚弱老年人的社会护理费用。

Social care costs for community-dwelling older people living with frailty.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):e804-e811. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13450. Epub 2021 May 26.

Abstract

International evidence indicates that older people with frailty are more likely to access social care services, compared to nonfrail older people. There is, however, no robust evidence on costs of social care provided for community-dwelling older people living with frailty in their own homes. The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between community-dwelling older people living with frailty, defined using the cumulative deficit model, and annual formal social care costs for the 2012-2018 period. A secondary objective was to estimate formal social care spending for every 1% reduction in the number of older people who develop frailty over 1 year. Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data from two large nationally representative community-based cohort studies in England was performed. Respondents aged ≥75 were used in the main analysis and respondents aged 65-74 in sensitivity testing. We used regression tree modelling for formal social care cost analysis including frailty, age, gender, age at completing education and living with partner as key covariates. We employed a minimum node size stopping criteria to limit tree complexity and overfitting and applied 'bootstrap aggregating' to improve robustness. We assessed the impact of an intervention for every 1% decrease in the number of individuals who become frail over 1 year in England. Results show that frailty is the strongest predictor of formal social care costs. Mean social care costs for people who are not frail are £321, compared with £2,895 for individuals with frailty. For every 1% of nonfrail people not transitioning to frailty savings of £4.4 million in annual expenditures on formal social care in England are expected, not including expenditure on care homes. Given considerably higher costs for individuals classed as frail compared to nonfrail, a successful intervention avoiding or postponing the onset of frailty has the potential to considerably reduce social care costs.

摘要

国际证据表明,与非虚弱老年人相比,虚弱的老年人更有可能获得社会护理服务。然而,对于在自己家中居住的虚弱的社区老年人提供的社会护理成本,尚无确凿证据。本研究的主要目的是研究使用累积缺陷模型定义的居住在社区中的虚弱的老年人与 2012-2018 年期间的年度正式社会护理成本之间的关系。次要目的是估计每年减少 1%的发展为虚弱的老年人数量,正式社会护理支出。对英格兰两项大型全国代表性社区为基础的队列研究的前瞻性队列数据进行二次分析。主要分析中使用了年龄≥75 岁的受访者,敏感性测试中使用了年龄为 65-74 岁的受访者。我们使用回归树模型进行正式社会护理成本分析,包括脆弱性、年龄、性别、完成教育的年龄和与伴侣同住等关键协变量。我们采用最小节点大小停止标准来限制树的复杂性和过度拟合,并应用“引导聚合”来提高稳健性。我们评估了在英格兰,每年减少 1%的人变得虚弱的情况下,干预措施的影响。结果表明,虚弱是正式社会护理成本的最强预测因素。不虚弱的人的平均社会护理成本为 321 英镑,而虚弱的人的平均社会护理成本为 2895 英镑。如果每年有 1%的非虚弱人群不向虚弱状态转变,则预计在英格兰,正式社会护理支出将节省 440 万英镑,不包括疗养院支出。鉴于与非虚弱人群相比,虚弱人群的成本要高得多,成功的干预措施避免或推迟虚弱的发生有可能大大降低社会护理成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验