Anderson Niall C, Zhou Yuefang, Humphris Gerry
School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jun 3;7(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00833-z.
It is unclear whether how people with long-term conditions express distress, and how clinicians respond, influences perceptions of consultation outcomes. The pilot study examined emotional distress and reassurance in consultations with people whose long-term conditions (at the time of consultations) were treated using active surveillance or symptom management (as no curative treatment was suitable).
An observational pilot study was conducted involving consultations between people with long-term conditions and their respective clinician. Consultations between three clinicians (two Huntington's Disease; one Prostate Cancer) and 22 people with long-term conditions (11 Huntington's Disease; 11 Prostate Cancer) were audio-recorded. Participants also completed an expanded Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure. Two researchers coded sessions using Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES/VR-CoDES-P). Code frequencies were calculated, t tests performed between conditions, and Pearson's correlations performed for associations between CARE responses and clinician utterances.
People with long-term conditions expressed emotional distress on average 4.45 times per session, averaging 1.09 Concern and 3.36 Cue utterances. Clinicians responded with more explicit (2.59) and space-providing (3.36), than non-explicit (1.86) and space-reducing (1.09), responses per session. Clinicians expressed spontaneous reassurance on average 5.18 times per session, averaging 3.77 Cognitive and 1.5 Affective reassurance utterances. Huntington's Disease consultations featured significantly more 'Cues', 'Concerns' and 'Overall' 'Emotional Distress', and 'Cognitive' and 'Overall' 'Reassurance'.
Emotional distress was expressed more using hints than explicit concern utterances. Clinicians predominantly explicitly explored distress rather than providing information/advice and provided advice using spontaneous cognitive reassurance. People with Huntington's Disease expressed more concerns and received more reassurance, indicating different needs between conditions. Future research is required to explore emotional distress and reassurance in a larger sample of participants and long-term condition types, and how the practical implications of these findings may be used to enhance outcomes of consultations.
N/A.
长期疾病患者表达痛苦的方式以及临床医生的应对方式是否会影响对咨询结果的认知尚不清楚。该试点研究调查了在咨询中,对于那些长期疾病(在咨询时)采用主动监测或症状管理(因为没有合适的治愈性治疗方法)的患者的情绪困扰和安慰情况。
进行了一项观察性试点研究,涉及长期疾病患者与其各自临床医生之间的咨询。记录了三位临床医生(两位治疗亨廷顿舞蹈症;一位治疗前列腺癌)与22位长期疾病患者(11位亨廷顿舞蹈症患者;11位前列腺癌患者)之间的咨询音频。参与者还完成了一份扩展的咨询与关系同理心(CARE)量表。两名研究人员使用情绪序列的维罗纳编码定义(VR-CoDES/VR-CoDES-P)对咨询过程进行编码。计算编码频率,对不同情况进行t检验,并对CARE量表的反应与临床医生话语之间的关联进行皮尔逊相关性分析。
长期疾病患者平均每次咨询表达情绪困扰4.45次,平均有1.09次表达担忧和3.36次提示性话语。临床医生每次咨询的回应中,明确回应(2.59次)和提供空间的回应(3.36次)多于不明确回应(1.86次)和减少空间的回应(1.09次)。临床医生平均每次咨询自发给予安慰5.18次,平均有3.77次认知性安慰话语和1.5次情感性安慰话语。亨廷顿舞蹈症咨询中出现的“提示”“担忧”和“总体”“情绪困扰”以及“认知”和“总体”“安慰”显著更多。
情绪困扰更多地通过暗示而非明确的担忧话语来表达。临床医生主要是明确探究困扰,而非提供信息/建议,并通过自发的认知性安慰提供建议。亨廷顿舞蹈症患者表达了更多担忧并得到了更多安慰,表明不同疾病情况存在不同需求。未来需要开展研究,在更大样本的参与者和更多长期疾病类型中探究情绪困扰和安慰情况,以及如何利用这些研究结果的实际意义来改善咨询结果。
无。