Suppr超能文献

对于无法接受治愈性治疗的慢性病患者,情绪困扰和安慰在医疗咨询中是如何表达的?一项针对亨廷顿舞蹈症和前列腺癌的试点观察研究。

How are emotional distress and reassurance expressed in medical consultations for people with long-term conditions who were unable to receive curative treatment? A pilot observational study with huntington's disease and prostate cancer.

作者信息

Anderson Niall C, Zhou Yuefang, Humphris Gerry

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jun 3;7(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00833-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether how people with long-term conditions express distress, and how clinicians respond, influences perceptions of consultation outcomes. The pilot study examined emotional distress and reassurance in consultations with people whose long-term conditions (at the time of consultations) were treated using active surveillance or symptom management (as no curative treatment was suitable).

METHODS

An observational pilot study was conducted involving consultations between people with long-term conditions and their respective clinician. Consultations between three clinicians (two Huntington's Disease; one Prostate Cancer) and 22 people with long-term conditions (11 Huntington's Disease; 11 Prostate Cancer) were audio-recorded. Participants also completed an expanded Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure. Two researchers coded sessions using Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES/VR-CoDES-P). Code frequencies were calculated, t tests performed between conditions, and Pearson's correlations performed for associations between CARE responses and clinician utterances.

RESULTS

People with long-term conditions expressed emotional distress on average 4.45 times per session, averaging 1.09 Concern and 3.36 Cue utterances. Clinicians responded with more explicit (2.59) and space-providing (3.36), than non-explicit (1.86) and space-reducing (1.09), responses per session. Clinicians expressed spontaneous reassurance on average 5.18 times per session, averaging 3.77 Cognitive and 1.5 Affective reassurance utterances. Huntington's Disease consultations featured significantly more 'Cues', 'Concerns' and 'Overall' 'Emotional Distress', and 'Cognitive' and 'Overall' 'Reassurance'.

CONCLUSION

Emotional distress was expressed more using hints than explicit concern utterances. Clinicians predominantly explicitly explored distress rather than providing information/advice and provided advice using spontaneous cognitive reassurance. People with Huntington's Disease expressed more concerns and received more reassurance, indicating different needs between conditions. Future research is required to explore emotional distress and reassurance in a larger sample of participants and long-term condition types, and how the practical implications of these findings may be used to enhance outcomes of consultations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

N/A.

摘要

目的

长期疾病患者表达痛苦的方式以及临床医生的应对方式是否会影响对咨询结果的认知尚不清楚。该试点研究调查了在咨询中,对于那些长期疾病(在咨询时)采用主动监测或症状管理(因为没有合适的治愈性治疗方法)的患者的情绪困扰和安慰情况。

方法

进行了一项观察性试点研究,涉及长期疾病患者与其各自临床医生之间的咨询。记录了三位临床医生(两位治疗亨廷顿舞蹈症;一位治疗前列腺癌)与22位长期疾病患者(11位亨廷顿舞蹈症患者;11位前列腺癌患者)之间的咨询音频。参与者还完成了一份扩展的咨询与关系同理心(CARE)量表。两名研究人员使用情绪序列的维罗纳编码定义(VR-CoDES/VR-CoDES-P)对咨询过程进行编码。计算编码频率,对不同情况进行t检验,并对CARE量表的反应与临床医生话语之间的关联进行皮尔逊相关性分析。

结果

长期疾病患者平均每次咨询表达情绪困扰4.45次,平均有1.09次表达担忧和3.36次提示性话语。临床医生每次咨询的回应中,明确回应(2.59次)和提供空间的回应(3.36次)多于不明确回应(1.86次)和减少空间的回应(1.09次)。临床医生平均每次咨询自发给予安慰5.18次,平均有3.77次认知性安慰话语和1.5次情感性安慰话语。亨廷顿舞蹈症咨询中出现的“提示”“担忧”和“总体”“情绪困扰”以及“认知”和“总体”“安慰”显著更多。

结论

情绪困扰更多地通过暗示而非明确的担忧话语来表达。临床医生主要是明确探究困扰,而非提供信息/建议,并通过自发的认知性安慰提供建议。亨廷顿舞蹈症患者表达了更多担忧并得到了更多安慰,表明不同疾病情况存在不同需求。未来需要开展研究,在更大样本的参与者和更多长期疾病类型中探究情绪困扰和安慰情况,以及如何利用这些研究结果的实际意义来改善咨询结果。

试验注册

无。

相似文献

7
Patient expression of emotions and neurologist responses in first multiple sclerosis consultations.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0127734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127734. eCollection 2015.
10
Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES).
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional Communication in Advanced Pediatric Cancer Conversations.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Apr;59(4):808-817.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
2
Structured Analysis of Empathic Opportunities and Physician Responses during Lung Cancer Patient-Physician Consultations.
J Health Commun. 2019;24(9):711-718. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1665757. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Modelling reassurances of clinicians with hidden Markov models.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0629-0.
5
Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES): Conceptual framework and future directions.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2303-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
Sequences of talk about emotional concerns in follow-up consultations with adolescent childhood cancer survivors.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
How head and neck consultants manage patients' emotional distress during cancer follow-up consultations: a multilevel study.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;272(9):2473-81. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3209-x. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.
Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2407-2416. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验