Br J Cancer. 1988 Jun;57(6):630-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1988.144.
A mail survey among 970 physicians from different specialties was carried out in Italy to learn about factors that influence physicians' decision-making for patients with early breast cancer. Ninety percent of respondents were in favour of a conservative procedure for the surgical treatment of a 35-year-old patient with primary tumour smaller than two centimeters. The same preference was also expressed by 66% of doctors for a 60-year-old patient with similar disease. Most physicians (78%) favoured the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal node-positive women. Preferences for the treatment of post-menopausal patients were divided among those in favour of endocrine therapy (51%), chemotherapy (32%), the combination of the two (7%) or no further treatment after surgery (8%). Several factors appeared to relate to therapeutic preferences. Each physician's specialty was the single most important factor associated with the preference for surgical treatment together with the attitude towards patients' involvement in decision-making which, however, was statistically significant only for the older patient. Analysis of predictors of preferences for adjuvant therapy showed that specialty and hospital size were associated with choosing chemotherapy for a premenopausal woman, and specialty and physician's sex with the indication of endocrine treatment in a postmenopausal patient. Our study documents that the application of research results depends on many factors, some of which have a sound scientific basis while others reflect highly personal opinions and the influence of the practice environment.
在意大利,对970名来自不同专业的医生进行了一项邮件调查,以了解影响医生对早期乳腺癌患者决策的因素。90%的受访者赞成对一名35岁、原发肿瘤小于两厘米的患者采用保守手术治疗。66%的医生对一名患有类似疾病的60岁患者也表达了同样的偏好。大多数医生(78%)赞成对绝经前淋巴结阳性的女性使用辅助化疗。对于绝经后患者的治疗偏好存在分歧,支持内分泌治疗的占51%,支持化疗的占32%,支持两者联合的占7%,支持术后不再进行进一步治疗的占8%。几个因素似乎与治疗偏好有关。每位医生的专业是与手术治疗偏好相关的唯一最重要因素,同时还有对患者参与决策的态度,不过,这仅对老年患者在统计学上具有显著意义。对辅助治疗偏好预测因素的分析表明,专业和医院规模与为绝经前女性选择化疗有关,而专业和医生性别与绝经后患者的内分泌治疗指征有关。我们的研究表明,研究结果的应用取决于许多因素,其中一些有可靠的科学依据,而另一些则反映了高度个人化的观点以及实践环境的影响。