Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
UK Health Forum, London, UK.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Oct;45(10):2179-2190. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases.
An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results.
RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption.
RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention.
在英格兰,确定针对严重肥胖(BMI≥35kg/m)的成年人的最具成本效益的体重管理方案(WMP),这些成年人更容易患上肥胖相关疾病。
对五种不同的 WMP 进行经济评估:1)低强度(WMP1);2)低热量饮食(VLCD)加 WMP1;3)中强度(WMP2);4)高强度(Look AHEAD);5)Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术(RYGB),均与不进行 WMP 的基线情况进行比较。我们还比较了 WMP1 与 VLCD 联合治疗与 WMP1 单独治疗的效果。使用微观模拟决策分析模型来推断体重指数变化的影响,该模型来自对 WMP 和减肥手术的随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。体重指数变化对肥胖相关疾病的长期风险、成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)产生影响,ICER 以 30 年时间范围内每获得一个 QALY 增加的增量成本来衡量,从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度来看。敏感性分析探讨了长期体重恢复假设对结果的影响。
RYGB 是最昂贵的干预措施,但也能降低肥胖相关疾病的发生率,从而获得最高的 QALY 收益。与不进行 WMP 相比,WMP1、WMP1 加 VLCD、WMP2、Look AHEAD 和 RYGB 的基础病例 ICER 分别为 557 英镑、6628 英镑、1540 英镑、23725 英镑和 10126 英镑/QALY。与 WMP1 相比,WMP1 加 VLCD 产生的 ICER 超过 121000 英镑/QALY。敏感性分析发现,所有 ICER 均对模型基础病例、五年干预后停止、体重恢复假设敏感。
RYGB 手术是最有效和最具成本效益的利用稀缺 NHS 资金的方法。然而,在固定的医疗保健预算或患者偏好排除手术作为一种选择的情况下,标准的 12 周行为 WMP(WMP1)是下一个最具成本效益的干预措施。