• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促成因素和阻碍因素对儿科急诊研究中的家长同意。

Facilitators and barriers for parental consent to pediatric emergency research.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2022 Apr;91(5):1156-1162. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01600-9. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1038/s41390-021-01600-9
PMID:34088985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obtaining informed consent for clinical research in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is challenging. Our objective was to understand the factors that influence parental consent for ED studies.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey assessing parents' willingness to enroll their children into an ED research study. Parents reporting a willingness to enroll in ED studies were presented with two hypothetical scenarios, a low-risk and a high-risk study, and then asked about decision influencers affecting consent. Parents expressing a lack of willingness to enroll were asked which decision influencers impacted their consent decision.

RESULTS

Among 118 parents, 90 (76%) stated they would be willing to enroll their child into an ED study; of these, 86 (96%) would consent for a low-risk study and 54 (60%) would consent for a high-risk study. Caucasian parents, and those with previous research exposure, were more likely to report willingness to participate. Those who would consent to the high-risk study cited "benefits that research would provide to future children" most strongly influenced their decision to agree.

CONCLUSIONS

ED investigators should highlight the benefits for future children and inquire about parents' previous exposure to research to enhance ED research enrollment. Barriers to consent in non-Caucasian families should be further investigated.

IMPACT

Obtaining consent for pediatric emergency research is challenging and this study identified factors influencing parental consent for research in EDs. Benefits for future children and parents' previous research experience were two of the most influential factors in parents' willingness to consent to ED research studies. These findings will help to improve enrollment in ED research studies and better our understanding of how to promote the health and well-being of pediatric patients.

摘要

背景

在儿科急诊部(ED)进行临床研究获得知情同意是具有挑战性的。我们的目的是了解影响父母同意 ED 研究的因素。

方法

这是一项横断面调查,评估父母愿意将其孩子纳入 ED 研究的意愿。报告愿意参加 ED 研究的父母被提供了两种假设情况,低风险和高风险研究,然后询问影响同意的决策影响因素。表示不愿意参加的父母被问及哪些决策影响因素影响了他们的同意决定。

结果

在 118 名父母中,有 90 名(76%)表示愿意将孩子纳入 ED 研究;其中,86 名(96%)会同意低风险研究,54 名(60%)会同意高风险研究。白种人父母和有过研究经验的父母更有可能报告愿意参与。那些同意高风险研究的人表示,“研究将为未来的孩子提供的益处”对他们同意的决定影响最大。

结论

ED 研究人员应强调研究对未来孩子的益处,并询问父母以前是否接触过研究,以增加 ED 研究的参与度。应进一步调查非白种人家属同意的障碍。

影响

获得儿科急诊研究的同意具有挑战性,本研究确定了影响父母同意 ED 研究的因素。未来孩子的利益和父母以前的研究经验是父母愿意同意 ED 研究的两个最具影响力的因素。这些发现将有助于提高 ED 研究的参与率,并更好地了解如何促进儿科患者的健康和福祉。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers for parental consent to pediatric emergency research.促成因素和阻碍因素对儿科急诊研究中的家长同意。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Apr;91(5):1156-1162. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01600-9. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Factors Influencing Parental Willingness to Consent to a Survey Study for Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.影响儿科急诊患者父母同意参与调查研究的意愿的因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 May 1;40(5):e33-e39. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003126. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.父母对生物样本库中同意和数据共享的态度:一项多地点实验性调查。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):128-142. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1505783. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent.在启动一项包含放弃知情同意的紧急研究之前进行社区咨询的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;6(12):1210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00135.x.
5
Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.影响父母参与临床研究决策的因素:同意者与不同意者。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050.
6
Consenting to pediatric critical care research: understanding the perspective of parents.同意小儿重症监护研究:理解家长的观点。
Dynamics. 2013 Fall;24(3):18-24.
7
Parental perceptions of clinical research in the pediatric emergency department.家长对儿科急诊科临床研究的看法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Aug;29(8):897-902. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31829e7f47.
8
Factors that influence parental attitudes toward enrollment in type 1 diabetes trials.影响家长参与 1 型糖尿病试验态度的因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044341. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
Factors Determining Parents' Decisions to Bring Their Children to the Pediatric Emergency Department for a Minor Illness.决定父母是否带孩子因小病前往儿科急诊的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 28;23:4141-4148. doi: 10.12659/msm.902639.
10
The quality of parental consent for research with children: a prospective repeated measure self-report survey.儿童研究中父母同意的质量:一项前瞻性重复测量自我报告调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 May;44(4):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。
Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
TRANSCENDENT (Transforming Research by Assessing Neuroinformatics across the Spectrum of Concussion by Embedding iNterdisciplinary Data-collection to Enable Novel Treatments): protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of concussion patients with embedded comparative effectiveness research within a network of learning health system concussion clinics in Canada.超越(通过在脑震荡全谱系中评估神经信息学、嵌入跨学科数据收集以实现新型治疗来转变研究):加拿大学习健康系统脑震荡诊所网络中一项针对脑震荡患者的前瞻性观察队列研究方案,其中嵌入了比较效果研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 22;15(4):e095292. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095292.

本文引用的文献

1
The participation of minorities in published pediatric research.少数群体在已发表的儿科研究中的参与情况。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jun;97(6):777-83.
2
Deciding for others.为他人做决定。
RN. 2004 Jul;67(7):25-6, 28.
3
Paediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the development of patient-specific therapy: ethical perspectives through experts' opinions.儿科全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)与个体化治疗的发展:专家意见的伦理视角。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1420297. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420297. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of the Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF) intervention to support recruitment for neonatal clinical trials: an intervention mapping guided approach.为支持新生儿临床试验招募而开发更好的家庭研究互动(BRIEF)干预措施:一项基于干预映射的方法。
Trials. 2024 Sep 12;25(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08446-6.
5
Relationship building in pediatric research recruitment: Insights from qualitative interviews with research staff.儿科研究招募中的关系建立:对研究人员进行定性访谈的见解
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 3;6(1):e138. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.469. eCollection 2022.
6
Multi-Omics Profiling Approach to Asthma: An Evolving Paradigm.哮喘的多组学分析方法:一种不断发展的范式。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):66. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010066.