Nussbaumer-Streit B, Ellen M, Klerings I, Sfetcu R, Riva N, Mahmić-Kaknjo M, Poulentzas G, Martinez P, Baladia E, Ziganshina L E, Marqués M E, Aguilar L, Kassianos A P, Frampton G, Silva A G, Affengruber L, Spjker R, Thomas J, Berg R C, Kontogiani M, Sousa M, Kontogiorgis C, Gartlehner G
Cochrane Austria, Danube University Krems, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
Department of Health Systems Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School Of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
We aimed to map the resource use during systematic review (SR) production and reasons why steps of the SR production are resource intensive to discover where the largest gain in improving efficiency might be possible.
We conducted a scoping review. An information specialist searched multiple databases (e.g., Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus) and implemented citation-based and grey literature searching. We employed dual and independent screenings of records at the title/abstract and full-text levels and data extraction.
We included 34 studies. Thirty-two reported on the resource use-mostly time; four described reasons why steps of the review process are resource intensive. Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal seem to be very resource intensive, while protocol development, literature search, or study retrieval take less time. Project management and administration required a large proportion of SR production time. Lack of experience, domain knowledge, use of collaborative and SR-tailored software, and good communication and management can be reasons why SR steps are resource intensive.
Resource use during SR production varies widely. Areas with the largest resource use are administration and project management, study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of studies.
我们旨在梳理系统评价（SR）制作过程中的资源使用情况，以及SR制作步骤资源密集的原因，以发现提高效率的最大收益可能所在之处。
我们进行了一项范围综述。一名信息专家检索了多个数据库（如Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus），并实施了基于引文和灰色文献的检索。我们在标题/摘要和全文层面采用了双人独立筛选记录及数据提取的方法。
我们纳入了34项研究。32项报告了资源使用情况——主要是时间；4项描述了综述过程步骤资源密集的原因。研究选择、数据提取和批判性评价似乎资源密集度非常高，而方案制定、文献检索或研究获取耗时较少。项目管理和行政管理占用了SR制作时间的很大一部分。缺乏经验、领域知识、使用协作式和SR定制软件，以及良好的沟通和管理可能是SR步骤资源密集的原因。
SR制作过程中的资源使用差异很大。资源使用最多的领域是行政管理和项目管理、研究选择、数据提取以及对研究的批判性评价。
