• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用认知走查法评估护理信息系统的可用性。

Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying cognitive walkthrough method.

机构信息

Research Centre for Health Information Management, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran; Department of Health Information Management & Technology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Department of Health Information Management & Technology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran; Department of Health Information Technology, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Islamic Republic of Iran.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459
PMID:34091145
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The user interface usability of the nursing information system (NIS) should be such that the nurses can learn and interact with it easily and quickly. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and solve the usability problems of these systems. The present study aimed to evaluate the usability of a NIS using the cognitive walkthrough (CW) evaluation method.

METHODS

Based on five selected scenarios, five evaluators evaluated the NIS in Shafa Hospital Information System. After identifying the problems, the evaluators assigned each problem to one of the usability attributes. The severity of each identified problem was determined by the evaluators and five real users of the system.

RESULTS

In total, 24 unique problems were identified. The average severity of the problems was determined by the evaluators (2.77) and the actual users (2.82) in the "major problem" category. The highest number of problems were assigned to the scenarios 3 and 2 with 15 and 14 problems, respectively. The highest average severity in terms of evaluations and actual users was related to the scenario 5 (3.06 and 2.94, respectively), which was in the "major problem" category. The highest number of problems were associated with learnability (8 problems) and efficiency (6 problems).

CONCLUSION

Since most of the nurses do not have enough time for learning the system, and given that the selected scenarios for evaluation were based on the most frequent daily tasks that nurses performed using the NIS; The correction of usability problems in the scenarios 3 and 2 that had the highest number of problems and the scenario 5 that had the highest average severity and execution time; it can reduce the nurses' cognitive load and the learning time of the system and increase the efficiency of nurses.

摘要

背景与目的

护理信息系统(NIS)的用户界面可用性应使护士能够轻松、快速地学习和与之交互。因此,有必要识别和解决这些系统的可用性问题。本研究旨在使用认知遍历(CW)评估方法评估 NIS 的可用性。

方法

基于五个选定的场景,五名评估员对沙法医院信息系统中的 NIS 进行了评估。在识别出问题后,评估员将每个问题分配给可用性属性之一。评估员和系统的五名实际用户确定了每个已识别问题的严重程度。

结果

共确定了 24 个独特的问题。评估员(2.77)和实际用户(2.82)将问题的平均严重程度确定为“主要问题”类别中的严重问题。问题最多的是场景 3 和 2,分别有 15 个和 14 个问题。评估和实际用户的平均严重程度最高的是场景 5(分别为 3.06 和 2.94),属于“主要问题”类别。与可学习性(8 个问题)和效率(6 个问题)相关的问题最多。

结论

由于大多数护士没有足够的时间学习系统,并且所选的评估场景基于护士使用 NIS 执行的最常见的日常任务;纠正场景 3 和 2 中问题最多、场景 5 中平均严重程度和执行时间最高的可用性问题;可以减轻护士的认知负担和系统的学习时间,提高护士的工作效率。

相似文献

1
Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying cognitive walkthrough method.运用认知走查法评估护理信息系统的可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
2
Comparison of usability evaluation methods for a health information system: heuristic evaluation versus cognitive walkthrough method.健康信息系统可用性评估方法比较:启发式评估与认知走查法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01905-7.
3
Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems.用于评估健康信息系统的启发式评估与认知走查可用性评估方法的比较
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e55-e60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw100.
4
Identification and Classification of Usability Problems in a Nursing Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.在护理信息系统中识别和分类可用性问题:启发式评估。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Aug 26;40(2):121-130. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000803.
5
Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.使用认知走查评估癌症登记系统的可用性,并评估用户对其问题的一致性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02120-8.
6
Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation.采用以用户为中心的认知遍历法评估移动医疗糖尿病自我管理应用:案例研究和初步方法验证。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Mar;91:103110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103110. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
7
User Interface Problems of a Nationwide Inpatient Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.全国住院患者信息系统的用户界面问题:启发式评估
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Feb 17;7(1):89-100. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-07-RA-0086. eCollection 2016.
8
The relationship between user interface problems of an admission, discharge and transfer module and usability features: a usability testing method.入院、出院和转科模块用户界面问题与可用性特征之间的关系:一种可用性测试方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 24;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0893-x.
9
A combination of two methods for evaluating the usability of a hospital information system.两种方法结合评估医院信息系统的可用性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 May 4;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1083-6.
10
Usability evaluation of obstetrics and gynecology information system using cognitive walkthrough method.使用认知走查法对妇产科信息系统进行可用性评估。
Electron Physician. 2018 Apr 25;10(4):6682-6688. doi: 10.19082/6682. eCollection 2018 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
The TRANS-SAFE Patient Safety Learning Laboratory: A Protocol for Systems Improvement for Psychosocial Safety in Transgender Care.跨性别者安全患者安全学习实验室:跨性别护理中心理社会安全系统改进方案
J Patient Saf. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001383.
2
DIEN Expert System Version 1 to formulate nursing diagnoses.DIEN专家系统版本1用于制定护理诊断。
Rev Cuid. 2025 Feb 7;16(1):e3945. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.3945. eCollection 2025 Jan-Apr.
3
Developing and evaluating a gamified self-management application for inflammatory bowel disease using the ADDIE model and Sukr framework.
使用ADDIE模型和Sukr框架开发并评估一款用于炎症性肠病的游戏化自我管理应用程序。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02842-3.
4
A heuristic evaluation of a pharmacy surveillance information system.药房监测信息系统的启发式评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02786-8.
5
Examining nurses' awareness level and compliance between defined and required access levels to core functionalities of hospital information system : an observational and survey study.考察护士对医院信息系统核心功能的规定访问级别与所需访问级别之间的认知水平及合规情况:一项观察性调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):1538. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12008-6.
6
Usability and Evaluation of a Health Information System in the Emergency Department: Mixed Methods Study.在急诊室中使用和评估健康信息系统的实用性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Feb 21;11:e48445. doi: 10.2196/48445.
7
Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.使用认知走查评估癌症登记系统的可用性,并评估用户对其问题的一致性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02120-8.
8
Visualization Method of Key Knowledge Points of Nursing Teaching Management System Based on SOM Algorithm and Biomedical Diagnosis.基于 SOM 算法和生物医学诊断的护理教学管理系统关键知识点可视化方法
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Oct 11;2022:7057437. doi: 10.1155/2022/7057437. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical decision support for intervention reduction in neonatal patients: A usability assessment.新生儿患者干预减少的临床决策支持:可用性评估。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 7;8:20552076221113696. doi: 10.1177/20552076221113696. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
Comparison of usability evaluation methods for a health information system: heuristic evaluation versus cognitive walkthrough method.健康信息系统可用性评估方法比较:启发式评估与认知走查法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01905-7.