• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药房监测信息系统的启发式评估。

A heuristic evaluation of a pharmacy surveillance information system.

作者信息

Abbasi Reza, Farzandipour Mehrdad, Rahimi Habiballah, Gong Yang, Nabovati Ehsan

机构信息

Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.

Health Information Management Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02786-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02786-8
PMID:39639309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11619703/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacy surveillance information system (PSIS) is intended to manage the dispensing practice of under-controlled drugs and substances. We designed and developed a PSIS for the first time in a developing country. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of this system using a heuristic evaluation method before the pilot implementation in outpatient pharmacies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in 2022 during the development of a pharmacy surveillance information system. Five evaluators examined the system using Nielson's heuristic evaluation method. The detected usability problems were categorized into 10 Nielson's usability principles, and their severity was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 91 unique usability problems were identified. The most detected usability problems were minor (60%). The "consistency and standard" (31%), "aesthetic and minimalist design" (28%), and "match between system and the real world" (12%) were the most frequent problems. Also, the "flexibility and efficiency of use" (mean = 2.9), "error prevention" (2.85), and "user control and freedom" (2.8) were the most severe problems.

CONCLUSION

The study has identified the most common and severe usability issues of an information system. It is important for the system developers to address these issues as it can significantly improve users' trust and satisfaction. Therefore, all the identified usability problems were resolved before the system was implemented.

摘要

引言

药房监测信息系统(PSIS)旨在管理管制药物和物质的配药操作。我们首次在一个发展中国家设计并开发了一个PSIS。本研究旨在在门诊药房试点实施之前,使用启发式评估方法评估该系统的可用性。

材料与方法

该研究于2022年在药房监测信息系统开发期间进行。五名评估人员使用尼尔森启发式评估方法对系统进行了检查。检测到的可用性问题被归类为尼尔森的10条可用性原则,并计算了其严重程度。

结果

总共识别出91个独特的可用性问题。检测到的大多数可用性问题为轻微问题(60%)。最常见的问题是“一致性和标准”(31%)、“美观和简约设计”(28%)以及“系统与现实世界的匹配”(12%)。此外,“使用的灵活性和效率”(平均=2.9)、“错误预防”(2.85)和“用户控制和自由度”(2.8)是最严重的问题。

结论

该研究确定了一个信息系统最常见和最严重的可用性问题。系统开发人员解决这些问题很重要,因为这可以显著提高用户的信任度和满意度。因此,在系统实施之前,所有识别出的可用性问题都得到了解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/745a71566597/12911_2024_2786_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/ef26d5c26b8a/12911_2024_2786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/40b6fde7ca40/12911_2024_2786_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/229ad4545d9e/12911_2024_2786_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/745a71566597/12911_2024_2786_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/ef26d5c26b8a/12911_2024_2786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/40b6fde7ca40/12911_2024_2786_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/229ad4545d9e/12911_2024_2786_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b806/11619703/745a71566597/12911_2024_2786_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A heuristic evaluation of a pharmacy surveillance information system.药房监测信息系统的启发式评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02786-8.
2
User Interface Problems of a Nationwide Inpatient Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.全国住院患者信息系统的用户界面问题:启发式评估
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Feb 17;7(1):89-100. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-07-RA-0086. eCollection 2016.
3
Evaluating the usability of an interactive, bi-lingual, touchscreen-enabled breastfeeding educational programme: application of Nielson's heuristics.评估一个交互式、双语、支持触摸屏的母乳喂养教育项目的可用性:尼尔森启发式原则的应用
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Mar 5;22(2):265-74. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.71.
4
Identification and Classification of Usability Problems in a Nursing Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.在护理信息系统中识别和分类可用性问题:启发式评估。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Aug 26;40(2):121-130. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000803.
5
Usability of a patient education and motivation tool using heuristic evaluation.使用启发式评估的患者教育与激励工具的可用性
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Nov 6;11(4):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1244.
6
Heuristic evaluation of a telehealth system from the Danish TeleCare North Trial.来自丹麦远程护理北方试验的远程医疗系统的启发式评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 May;84(5):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Evaluating the usability of a national health information system with heuristic method.用启发式方法评估国家卫生信息系统的可用性。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 30;11:182. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_349_21. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing the Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System: Heuristic Evaluation.评估临床决策支持系统的可用性:启发式评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 10;9(2):e31758. doi: 10.2196/31758.
9
Evaluating the agreement of users with usability problems identified by heuristic evaluation.评估用户对启发式评估中发现的可用性问题的认同程度。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Sep;117:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 28.
10
Systematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians' and Human Factors Engineers' Perspectives.计算机化咨询医嘱模板的系统启发式评估:临床医生和人因工程师的视角。
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug;41(8):129. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0775-7. Epub 2017 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of usability evaluation methods for a health information system: heuristic evaluation versus cognitive walkthrough method.健康信息系统可用性评估方法比较:启发式评估与认知走查法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01905-7.
2
Identification and Classification of Usability Problems in a Nursing Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.在护理信息系统中识别和分类可用性问题:启发式评估。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Aug 26;40(2):121-130. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000803.
3
Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying cognitive walkthrough method.
运用认知走查法评估护理信息系统的可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104459. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
Workload of pharmacists and the performance of pharmacy services.药师的工作量和药学服务的绩效。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231482. eCollection 2020.
5
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
6
Evaluating the agreement of users with usability problems identified by heuristic evaluation.评估用户对启发式评估中发现的可用性问题的认同程度。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Sep;117:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Comparison of two heuristic evaluation methods for evaluating the usability of health information systems.两种启发式评估方法评估健康信息系统可用性的比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Apr;80:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Systematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians' and Human Factors Engineers' Perspectives.计算机化咨询医嘱模板的系统启发式评估:临床医生和人因工程师的视角。
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug;41(8):129. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0775-7. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
9
Evaluating Nurses' Satisfaction With Two Nursing Information Systems.评估护士对两种护理信息系统的满意度。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jun;35(6):307-314. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000319.
10
Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems.用于评估健康信息系统的启发式评估与认知走查可用性评估方法的比较
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e55-e60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw100.