Ho Clement K M, Chen Claire, Setoh Johnson W S, Yap Willie W T, Hawkins Robert C W
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Apr 27;25:e00232. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00232. eCollection 2021 May.
Interference of chemistry assays by hemolysis, icterus and lipemia (HIL) was investigated on the Abbott Alinity c system. We sought to empirically establish optimized HIL index thresholds for the purposes of reporting HIL interference in a hospital laboratory and advising clinicians on the interpretation of laboratory results in the presence of hemolysis, icterus or lipemia.
HIL index values measured by spectrophotometry were compared with concentrations of hemoglobin, bilirubin and Intralipid. HIL interference of 35 Abbott Alinity chemistry assays was subsequently investigated by pairwise comparison of test results in pooled serum or plasma with those in test preparations spiked with hemolysate, bilirubin or Intralipid. Data generated from the interference experiments were critically assessed according to assay-specific acceptance criteria adapted from multiple sources, and optimized thresholds for HIL indices were established.
Correlations between HIL index values and their corresponding concentrations of hemoglobin, bilirubin and Intralipid were, in general, very good within the ranges of interferent concentrations tested. Hemolysis significantly affected 12 of 35 assays, whereas bilirubin and Intralipid interfered with four and three assays, respectively. Both the direction and magnitude of Intralipid interference with the direct bilirubin assay were dependent on the concentrations of the analyte.
HIL interference of the Abbott Alinity clinical chemistry assays investigated in this study was not uncommon At present, there are no universally accepted criteria for defining significant assay interference for clinical practice. In establishing acceptance criteria for defining assay interference, each assay should be assessed according to both analytical criteria and clinical relevance.
在雅培Alinity c系统上研究溶血、黄疸和脂血(HIL)对化学检测的干扰。我们试图通过经验确定优化的HIL指数阈值,以便在医院实验室报告HIL干扰情况,并就存在溶血、黄疸或脂血时实验室结果的解读向临床医生提供建议。
将通过分光光度法测量的HIL指数值与血红蛋白、胆红素和脂肪乳剂的浓度进行比较。随后,通过将混合血清或血浆中的检测结果与添加了溶血产物、胆红素或脂肪乳剂的检测制剂中的结果进行成对比较,研究了35种雅培Alinity化学检测的HIL干扰。根据从多个来源改编的特定检测接受标准,对干扰实验产生的数据进行严格评估,并确定HIL指数的优化阈值。
在所测试的干扰物浓度范围内,HIL指数值与其相应的血红蛋白、胆红素和脂肪乳剂浓度之间的相关性总体上非常好。溶血显著影响了35种检测中的12种,而胆红素和脂肪乳剂分别干扰了4种和三种检测。脂肪乳剂对直接胆红素检测的干扰方向和程度均取决于分析物的浓度。
本研究中所调查的雅培Alinity临床化学检测的HIL干扰并不罕见。目前,对于临床实践中定义显著检测干扰尚无普遍接受的标准。在建立定义检测干扰的接受标准时,应根据分析标准和临床相关性对每种检测进行评估。