Ucar Fikret, Ozcimen Muammer
Ophthalmology Department, Konyagoz Eye Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Ophthalmology Department, Saglik Bilimleri University Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 17;37(2):158-163. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1933545. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the toric intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular tension ring (CTR) suturing technique in patients with cataract and astigmatism.
Group 1 comprised 37 eyes of 36 patients to whom the CTR-toric IOL complex was co-implanted after the CTR was sutured to the toric IOL haptic. Group 2 comprised 35 eyes of 33 patients in whom the toric IOL and CTR were implanted without suturing. Both groups were compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative astigmatism, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and IOL rotation.
The mean rotation degree was 0.54° ± 2.29° in group 1 and 4.28° ± 8.84° in group 2 ( = .01). While there was no significant difference between the postoperative residual astigmatism and the estimated residual astigmatism in group 1, the postoperative residual astigmatism was statistically higher than the estimated residual astigmatism in group 2 ( = .47 and 0.000, respectively). The mean postoperative UCVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 (logMAR) in group 1 and 0.08 ± 0.13 (logMAR) in group 2 ( = .01).
The toric IOL and CTR suturing technique provides excellent rotational stability and astigmatism correction.
在本研究中,我们旨在评估白内障合并散光患者采用散光型人工晶状体(IOL)与囊袋张力环(CTR)缝合技术的效果。
第1组由36例患者的37只眼组成,在将CTR缝合至散光型IOL袢后,将CTR-散光型IOL复合体联合植入。第2组由33例患者的35只眼组成,其中散光型IOL和CTR未缝合植入。比较两组术前和术后的散光、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、未矫正视力(UCVA)和IOL旋转情况。
第1组平均旋转度数为0.54°±2.29°,第2组为4.28°±8.84°(P = 0.01)。第1组术后残余散光与预估残余散光之间无显著差异,而第2组术后残余散光在统计学上高于预估残余散光(分别为P = 0.47和0.000)。第1组术后平均UCVA为0.02±0.04(logMAR),第2组为0.08±0.13(logMAR)(P = 0.01)。
散光型IOL与CTR缝合技术可提供出色的旋转稳定性和散光矫正效果。