• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化病理方法对大麻滥用的研究:在社区成年人样本中评估大麻需求和延迟折扣的独立和交互作用。

A reinforcer pathology approach to cannabis misuse: Evaluation of independent and interactive roles of cannabis demand and delay discounting in a sample of community adults.

机构信息

Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.

Department of Psychology, University of Memphis.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Oct;30(5):584-592. doi: 10.1037/pha0000485. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000485
PMID:34096758
Abstract

Cannabis use is prevalent and concerns about cannabis misuse are increasing. A reinforcer pathology approach emphasizes the roles of drug reinforcing value (demand) and overvaluation of immediate rewards (delay discounting [DD]) in drug use but has been applied to a lesser extent to cannabis. The present study investigated the independent and interactive roles of these processes in relation to cannabis misuse in a community sample of adult cannabis users (N = 324; 44.8% female; M = 33.25). Participants completed a Marijuana Purchase Task (MPT), the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ), and the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) to assess demand, DD, and cannabis misuse, respectively. Zero-order correlations revealed significant associations between CUDIT-R scores and both the demand indices (|r | = .21-.56, p < .01-.001) and DD (r = .21, p < .01). In multivariate analyses, lower elasticity (i.e., price insensitivity) was robustly associated with higher CUDIT-R scores, while other demand indicators did not explain additional unique variance. However, as elasticity, intensity, and O exhibited robust zero-order intercorrelations, shared variance appeared to drive the association. An interactive relationship between elasticity and DD was not significant. These findings indicate that cannabis misuse is associated with both cannabis demand, particularly as measured by insensitivity to escalating costs, and immediate reward orientation, but the relationship was not synergistic. These results support a reinforcer pathology approach to cannabis misuse and, although causality cannot be inferred cross-sectionally, suggest that evaluating the longitudinal significance of these indicators is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

大麻的使用非常普遍,人们对大麻滥用的担忧也在与日俱增。强化病理方法强调了药物强化价值(需求)和即时奖励高估(延迟折扣[DD])在药物使用中的作用,但在大麻方面的应用相对较少。本研究在一个成年大麻使用者的社区样本中(N=324;44.8%为女性;M=33.25),调查了这些过程在与大麻滥用有关的独立和相互作用的作用。参与者完成了大麻购买任务(MPT)、货币选择问卷(MCQ)和大麻使用障碍识别测试修订版(CUDIT-R),分别评估需求、DD 和大麻滥用。零阶相关显示,CUDIT-R 评分与需求指数(|r|=.21-.56,p<.01-.001)和 DD(r=.21,p<.01)之间存在显著关联。在多元分析中,较低的弹性(即对价格不敏感)与较高的 CUDIT-R 评分显著相关,而其他需求指标则无法解释额外的独特差异。然而,由于弹性、强度和 O 之间存在稳健的零阶相互关联,因此共享方差似乎驱动了这种关联。弹性和 DD 之间的交互关系不显著。这些发现表明,大麻滥用与大麻需求有关,特别是与对成本不断上升的不敏感有关,以及即时奖励取向有关,但这种关系并不是协同的。这些结果支持大麻滥用的强化病理方法,尽管不能从横截面上推断因果关系,但表明有必要评估这些指标的纵向意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A reinforcer pathology approach to cannabis misuse: Evaluation of independent and interactive roles of cannabis demand and delay discounting in a sample of community adults.强化病理方法对大麻滥用的研究:在社区成年人样本中评估大麻需求和延迟折扣的独立和交互作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Oct;30(5):584-592. doi: 10.1037/pha0000485. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: Convergence in behavioral economic methods.大麻需求与延迟奖励折扣之间的相互关系:行为经济学方法的趋同
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 1;169:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Age differences in the behavioural economics of cannabis use: Do adolescents and adults differ on demand for cannabis and discounting of future reward?使用行为经济学研究年龄对大麻的影响:青少年和成年人对大麻的需求和未来奖励的折扣是否存在差异?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Sep 1;238:109531. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109531. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Discounting of delayed monetary and cannabis rewards in a crowdsourced sample of adults.成人众包样本中延迟货币和大麻奖励的折扣情况。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Aug;28(4):462-470. doi: 10.1037/pha0000327. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
5
Using an Optimized Marijuana Purchase Task to Examine Cannabis Demand in Relation to Cannabis Misuse in Heavy Drinking Emerging Adults.利用优化后的大麻购买任务来研究与重度饮酒的青年中与大麻滥用有关的大麻需求。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 May;82(3):351-361. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.351.
6
Can I see some ID? Examining validity of the marijuana purchase task among late adolescent cannabis users.我可以看一下身份证吗?在青少年晚期大麻使用者中检验大麻购买任务的有效性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;31(1):238-247. doi: 10.1037/pha0000570. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Evaluating non-medical prescription opioid demand using commodity purchase tasks: test-retest reliability and incremental validity.使用商品购买任务评估非医疗处方类阿片需求:重测信度和增量效度。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Sep;236(9):2641-2652. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05234-y. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Concurrent validity of the marijuana purchase task: a meta-analysis of trait-level cannabis demand and cannabis involvement.大麻购买任务的同时效度:特质水平大麻需求和大麻卷入的元分析。
Addiction. 2023 Apr;118(4):620-633. doi: 10.1111/add.16075. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Dual use of alcohol and cannabis among college students: A reinforcer pathologies approach.大学生中酒精和大麻的双重使用:强化病理方法。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;29(4):407-417. doi: 10.1037/pha0000369. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs.用于重复测量设计的固定选择、延迟折扣评估的替代版本。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct;26(5):503-508. doi: 10.1037/pha0000211. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Stress Effect on Delay Discounting and Cannabis Demand Among Individuals Endorsing High-Frequency Cannabis Use.急性应激对高频使用大麻者延迟折扣和大麻需求的影响。
Cannabis. 2025 Feb 1;8(1):21-39. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000275. eCollection 2025.
2
Food Cue Reactivity Meets the Reinforcer Pathology Model: Behavioral Economic Measures of Cue-Induced Changes in Food Reinforcer Efficacy.食物线索反应性与强化物病理学模型相遇:线索诱导的食物强化物效能变化的行为经济学测量
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 2;47(2):393-416. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00409-1. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Reliability and validity of behavioral-economic measures: A review and synthesis of discounting and demand.
行为经济学测量的可靠性和有效性:折扣和需求的综述与综合。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2023 Sep;120(2):263-280. doi: 10.1002/jeab.860. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Cannabis Involvement and Demand in Frequent Concentrate Users Versus Predominantly Flower Users.大麻吸食者中频繁吸食浓缩大麻制品者与主要吸食大麻花者的大麻使用情况和需求。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Mar;84(2):214-221. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00066. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
A hypothetical lottery task to assess relative resource allocation toward alcohol and cannabis.一个假设的彩票任务,用于评估对酒精和大麻的相对资源分配。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;37(1):144-155. doi: 10.1037/adb0000888. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Concurrent validity of the marijuana purchase task: a meta-analysis of trait-level cannabis demand and cannabis involvement.大麻购买任务的同时效度:特质水平大麻需求和大麻卷入的元分析。
Addiction. 2023 Apr;118(4):620-633. doi: 10.1111/add.16075. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Cannabis Use Disorder: A Behavioral Economic Perspective.大麻使用障碍:行为经济学视角
Curr Addict Rep. 2022 Mar;9(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s40429-021-00405-4. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Can I see some ID? Examining validity of the marijuana purchase task among late adolescent cannabis users.我可以看一下身份证吗?在青少年晚期大麻使用者中检验大麻购买任务的有效性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Feb;31(1):238-247. doi: 10.1037/pha0000570. Epub 2022 May 19.