Rodrigues Clarissa Teles, EzEldeen Mostafa, Jacobs Reinhilde, Lambrechts Paul, Alcalde Murilo Priori, Hungaro Duarte Marco Antonio
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):631-638. doi: 10.1111/aej.12534. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of UAI with ESI, sonic activation with Eddy and syringe irrigation in removing debris, and dentin removal during canal irrigation. Twenty-four mandibular molars containing isthmus type V and with a mean curvature of 32.5° were instrumented and divided into three groups for final irrigation: UAI with ESI, sonic activation with Eddy and syringe irrigation. The samples were scanned in a SkyScan 1172 micro-CT device for pre-, post-instrumentation and post-irrigation images and analysis of dentin removal. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. UAI and sonic activation significantly improved debris removal (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed regarding dentin removal between the groups (P > 0.05), although higher values were found for UAI. Sonic activation with Eddy showed to be an effective and safe device since it was able to remove debris without causing damage to the canal walls.
本研究的目的是比较超声辅助冲洗(UAI)与电声联合冲洗(ESI)、使用Eddy进行声波激活以及注射器冲洗在清除根管内碎屑和根管冲洗过程中去除牙本质方面的效果。选取24颗含有V型峡部且平均弯曲度为32.5°的下颌磨牙进行预备,然后分为三组进行最终冲洗:超声辅助冲洗联合电声联合冲洗、使用Eddy进行声波激活以及注射器冲洗。在SkyScan 1172微型CT设备上对样本进行扫描,以获取预备前、预备后和冲洗后的图像,并分析牙本质的去除情况。使用Wilcoxon、Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn检验进行统计分析。超声辅助冲洗和声波激活在清除碎屑方面有显著改善(P < 0.05)。尽管超声辅助冲洗组的牙本质去除值更高,但各组之间在牙本质去除方面未观察到显著差异(P > 0.05)。使用Eddy进行声波激活是一种有效且安全的设备,因为它能够在不损伤根管壁的情况下清除碎屑。