IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Jan;69(1):42-52. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3087039. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Quantitative assessment of myocardial stiffness is crucial to understand and evaluate cardiac biomechanics and function. Despite the recent progresses of ultrasonic shear wave elastography, quantitative evaluation of myocardial stiffness still remains a challenge because of strong elastic anisotropy. In this paper we introduce a smart ultrasound approach for non-invasive real-time quantification of shear wave velocity (SWV) and elastic fractional anisotropy (FA) in locally transverse isotropic elastic medium such as the myocardium. The approach relies on a simultaneous multidirectional evaluation of the SWV without a prior knowledge of the fiber orientation. We demonstrated that it can quantify accurately SWV in the range of 1.5 to 6 m/s in transverse isotropic medium (FA < 0.7) using numerical simulations. Experimental validation was performed on calibrated phantoms and anisotropic ex vivo tissues. A mean absolute error of 0.22 m/s was found when compared to gold standard measurements. Finally, in vivo feasibility of myocardial anisotropic stiffness assessment was evaluated in four healthy volunteers on the antero-septo basal segment and on anterior free wall of the right ventricle (RV) in end-diastole. A mean longitudinal SWV of 1.08 ± 0.20 m/s was measured on the RV wall and 1.74 ± 0.51 m/s on the septal wall with a good intra-volunteer reproducibility (±0.18 m/s). This approach has the potential to become a clinical tool for the quantitative evaluation of myocardial stiffness and diastolic function.
定量评估心肌硬度对于理解和评估心脏生物力学和功能至关重要。尽管超声剪切波弹性成像技术最近取得了进展,但由于心肌等局部横向各向同性弹性介质的强弹性各向异性,定量评估心肌硬度仍然具有挑战性。本文提出了一种智能超声方法,用于非侵入性实时定量评估剪切波速度(SWV)和弹性各向异性分数(FA)在局部横向各向同性弹性介质中,如心肌。该方法依赖于在没有纤维方向先验知识的情况下同时进行多方向 SWV 评估。我们通过数值模拟证明,它可以在横向各向同性介质(FA<0.7)中准确地定量测量 1.5 到 6 m/s 范围内的 SWV。在经过校准的体模和各向异性离体组织上进行了实验验证。与金标准测量值相比,发现平均绝对误差为 0.22 m/s。最后,在四名健康志愿者的前间隔基底部和右心室(RV)前游离壁的舒张末期评估了心肌各向异性硬度评估的体内可行性。在 RV 壁上测量到的平均纵向 SWV 为 1.08±0.20 m/s,在间隔壁上测量到的平均纵向 SWV 为 1.74±0.51 m/s,志愿者内的重复性良好(±0.18 m/s)。该方法有可能成为定量评估心肌硬度和舒张功能的临床工具。