NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence PREMISE, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 7;16(6):e0252815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252815. eCollection 2021.
Childhood adversity is a strong, and concerningly prevalent, risk factor for the later development of substance misuse. Yet despite substantial accumulating evidence for causal mechanisms, there has been little attempt to synthesize the strength of the evidence. Importantly, these mechanisms may be amenable to intervention, providing targets for substance use prevention among those exposed to childhood adversity. The present review aimed to systematically identify mediating and moderating mechanisms operating between childhood adversity and substance use.
A systematic review was conducted. Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL) were searched from 1998 to 2020 for modifiable mediators and moderators of the relationship between childhood adversity and substance use in people aged 10-24. Data was qualitatively synthesised, using a socio-ecological perspective to group mediators/moderators into individual, interpersonal, community, and public policy/cultural levels of behaviour.
After screening against eligibility criteria, 50 studies were included in the current review. The mediators at the individual level of behaviour showing the largest and most consistent effect sizes included externalising behaviour, anger, coping motives for substance use, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Among individual-level moderators, religiosity, future orientation and depressive symptoms all attenuated the relationship between childhood adversity and substance use. At the interpersonal level, peer relationships and mother-child relationships mediated the effect of adversity on substance use. Moderators included family cohesion and relationship quality. Community factors were less commonly studied, though school mobility and educational achievement mediated 14% and 28% of the total effect of childhood adversity on substance use respectively. No mediators or moderators were identified for public policy/culture.
A substantial proportion of the relationship between childhood adversity and substance use in youth is mediated through individual, interpersonal and community factors. Coupled with the knowledge that existing, evidence-based programs effectively address many of the identified mediators and moderators, this review advances knowledge on optimal targets to prevent substance misuse among those exposed to childhood adversity.
童年逆境是导致后来物质滥用的一个强烈且令人担忧的普遍风险因素。然而,尽管有大量关于因果机制的累积证据,但很少有人试图综合证据的强度。重要的是,这些机制可能可以通过干预来解决,为那些经历过童年逆境的人提供预防物质滥用的目标。本综述旨在系统地确定童年逆境与物质使用之间的中介和调节机制。
进行了系统的文献检索。从 1998 年到 2020 年,电子数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 CINAHL)被用来搜索 10-24 岁人群中童年逆境与物质使用之间关系的可调节中介和调节因素。使用社会生态学视角将中介/调节因素分为个体、人际、社区和公共政策/文化行为层面,对数据进行定性综合。
根据纳入标准筛选后,本综述共纳入 50 项研究。个体行为层面中介因素中,具有最大和最一致效应量的因素包括外化行为、愤怒、物质使用的应对动机和创伤后应激症状。个体水平的调节因素中,宗教信仰、未来取向和抑郁症状都减弱了童年逆境与物质使用之间的关系。在人际层面,同伴关系和母子关系中介了逆境对物质使用的影响。调节因素包括家庭凝聚力和关系质量。社区因素研究较少,但学校流动性和教育成就分别介导了童年逆境对物质使用总效应的 14%和 28%。公共政策/文化方面没有发现中介或调节因素。
童年逆境与青少年物质使用之间的关系在很大程度上是通过个体、人际和社区因素来介导的。再加上现有的、基于证据的方案有效地解决了许多已确定的中介和调节因素,这一综述提高了关于预防那些经历过童年逆境的人滥用物质的最佳目标的知识。