• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神健康顾问对住院的物质使用障碍或滥用患者实施 SBIRT:评估医院利用度和费用。

SBIRT administered by mental health counselors for hospitalized adults with substance misuse or disordered use: Evaluating hospital utilization and costs.

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States of America.

School of Education, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1300 Spring Garden Street, Greensboro, NC 27412, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108510. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108510. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108510
PMID:34098211
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the association of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) with hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and related costs, when administered to inpatients with substance misuse or disordered use by professional mental health counselors.

METHODS

Our study used retrospective program and health records data and a difference-in-differences design with propensity score covariates. The study population consisted of hospital inpatients admitted to integrated care services staffed by physicians, nurses, and mental health counselors. The intervention group consisted of patients selected for intervention based on substance use history and receiving SBIRT (n = 1577). Patients selected for intervention but discharged before SBIRT administration (n = 618) formed the comparison group. The outcome variables were hospitalization and ED visits costs and counts. Costs of hospitalizations and ED visits were combined to allow sufficient data for analysis, with counts treated similarly. Patient-level variables were substance use type and substance use severity. A cluster variable was inpatient clinical service. Zero-censored and two-part logistic and generalized linear models with robust standard errors tested the association of SBIRT interventions with the outcomes.

RESULTS

For the full study population of patients using alcohol, illicit drugs, or both, SBIRT administered by mental health counselors was not associated with changes in hospitalizations and ED visits. For patients with alcohol misuse or disordered use, SBIRT by mental health counselors was associated an odds ratio of 0.32 (p < .001) of having subsequent hospitalizations or ED visits. For patients with alcohol use who did return as hospital inpatients or to the ED, SBIRT by counselors was associated with a reduction in costs of $2547 per patient (p < .001) and with an incidence rate ratio of 0.57 for counts (p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that professional mental health counselors on inpatient integrated care teams may provide SBIRT effectively for patients with misuse and disordered use of alcohol, reducing the likelihood of future healthcare utilization and costs.

摘要

目的

我们分析了由专业心理健康辅导员对有物质使用障碍或滥用问题的住院患者实施筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)与住院、急诊就诊(ED)及其相关费用之间的关联。

方法

本研究使用回顾性项目和健康记录数据,并采用倾向评分协变量的差分法设计。研究人群包括由医生、护士和心理健康辅导员组成的综合护理服务收治的住院患者。干预组由根据物质使用史选择并接受 SBIRT 的患者组成(n=1577)。选择接受 SBIRT 但在干预前出院的患者(n=618)作为对照组。因变量为住院和 ED 就诊费用和就诊次数。将住院和 ED 就诊费用合并,以便进行充分分析,就诊次数也采用类似方法处理。患者层面的变量为物质使用类型和物质使用严重程度。聚类变量为住院患者临床服务。采用零截断和两部分逻辑回归及广义线性模型,使用稳健标准误差检验 SBIRT 干预与结果之间的关联。

结果

对于使用酒精、非法药物或两者的所有患者,心理健康辅导员实施的 SBIRT 与住院和 ED 就诊次数的变化无关。对于有酒精滥用或障碍性使用的患者,心理健康辅导员实施的 SBIRT 与随后住院或 ED 就诊的比值比为 0.32(p<.001)。对于返回住院或 ED 的有酒精使用障碍的患者,辅导员提供的 SBIRT 与每位患者减少 2547 美元的费用相关(p<.001),并且就诊次数的发生率比为 0.57(p=.003)。

结论

我们的结果表明,住院综合护理团队中的专业心理健康辅导员可能会有效地为有酒精滥用和障碍性使用问题的患者提供 SBIRT,降低未来医疗保健利用和费用的可能性。

相似文献

1
SBIRT administered by mental health counselors for hospitalized adults with substance misuse or disordered use: Evaluating hospital utilization and costs.精神健康顾问对住院的物质使用障碍或滥用患者实施 SBIRT:评估医院利用度和费用。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108510. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108510. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in the Emergency Department: An Examination of Health Care Utilization and Costs.急诊科的筛查、简短干预和转介治疗:对医疗保健利用和成本的考察。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):146-152. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000859.
3
Health Care Utilization After Paraprofessional-administered Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment: A Multi-level Cost-offset Analysis.卫生保健服务利用后准专业人员实施药物使用筛查、简短干预和转介治疗:多层次成本抵消分析。
Med Care. 2019 Sep;57(9):673-679. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001162.
4
Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.在实际环境中维持筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)项目:模拟其收入与成本
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112 Suppl 2:101-109. doi: 10.1111/add.13650.
5
Evaluation of the Washington state screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment project: cost outcomes for Medicaid patients screened in hospital emergency departments.华盛顿州筛查、简短干预和转介治疗项目评估:在医院急诊部门筛查的医疗补助患者的成本结果。
Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd498f.
6
Use of non-face-to-face modalities for emergency department screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (ED-SBIRT) for high-risk alcohol use: A scoping review.非面对面模式在急诊筛查、简短干预和高危酒精使用治疗转介(ED-SBIRT)中的应用:范围综述。
Subst Abus. 2019;40(1):20-32. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1550465. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
7
Alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral in the emergency department: an implementation study.急诊科的酒精筛查、简短干预及转诊:一项实施研究。
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Feb;34(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.03.019. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
8
Young Adult Substance Use and Healthcare Use Associated With Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in Pediatric Primary Care.青少年物质使用与医疗保健利用与儿科初级保健中的筛查、简短干预和转介治疗相关。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Oct;71(4S):S15-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.11.033.
9
Using process indicators to optimize service completion of an ED drug and alcohol brief intervention program.运用过程指标优化急诊科药物与酒精简短干预项目的服务完成情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;33(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
10
A preliminary report of knowledge translation: lessons from taking screening and brief intervention techniques from the research setting into regional systems of care.知识转化的初步报告:从研究环境到区域护理系统采用筛查和简短干预技术的经验教训。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00516.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis Examining the Impact of Coexisting Diabetes and Substance Use Disorder on Hospital Resource Utilization.一项回顾性分析:探究并存糖尿病与物质使用障碍对医院资源利用的影响
Cureus. 2025 May 11;17(5):e83895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83895. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Inpatient Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients Admitted with Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Is Not Universally Implemented in Practice, But Can Reduce Readmissions for Alcohol-associated Hepatitis.对于因酒精性肝病入院的患者,酒精使用障碍的住院筛查、简短干预及转诊治疗在实际中并未普遍实施,但可减少酒精性肝炎的再入院率。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 30;7(2):169-176. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad048. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Factors related to substance use treatment attendance after peer recovery coach intervention in the emergency department.急诊科同伴康复教练干预后与物质使用治疗出勤率相关的因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Dec;5. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100093. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
4
Barriers to implementation of pediatric emergency department interventions for parental tobacco use and dependence: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.针对父母吸烟行为及戒烟的儿科急诊科干预措施实施的障碍:一项运用理论领域框架的定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jan 12;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00251-5.